Skip to main content

The School Effectiveness Knowledge Base as a Guide for School Improvement

  • Chapter
The Practice and Theory of School Improvement

Abstract

In this chapter Jaap Scheerens outlines a conceptual map of the conditions for effective schooling. He does this by examining the ‘modes’, ‘mechanisms’ and ‘levers’ of schooling. Modes are the various malleable dimensions of schooling. Mechanisms are theory embedded principles that could explain why certain factors work in education. Levers are the operational action implications of mechanisms. In the second part of the chapter he assesses the knowledge base of school effectiveness research by establishing to what extent empirical research covers the conceptual map, by examining the formal structure of integrated models and by evaluating the results of empirical research. In the last section of the chapter Scheerens draws out the implications for school improvement. He further discusses the concepts of educational leadership and evaluation-oriented school policy as being the most promising levers for school improvement, particularly within the school management mode.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning and action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosker, R.J., & Scheerens, J. (1994). Alternative models of school effectiveness put to the test. In R. X Bosker, B. P. M. Creemers, & J. Scheerens (Eds.), Conceptual and methodological advances in educational effectiveness research (pp. 159–180). Special issue of the International Journal of Educational Research, 21(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosker, R. J., & Witziers, B. (1995). A meta-analytical approach regarding school effectiveness: The true size of school effects and the effect size and educational leadership. Paper presented at the ECER Congress, Bath, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. (1969). Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y. C. (1993). Conceptualization and measurement of school effectiveness: An organizational perspective. Paper presented at AERA annual meeting, Atlanta, Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1990). Politics, markets and American schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Quarterly, 17, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1993). The design of schools as output-driven organizations. Internal paper, University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton, K. (1995). Effective schooling practices: A research synthesis. School Improvement Research Series. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror, Y. (1968). Public policy-making reexamined. Chandler, Scranton, Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faerman, S. R., & Quinn, R. E. (1985). Effectiveness: The perspective from organization theory. Review of Higher Education, 9, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, H. W., & Fowler, F. G. (1964). Concise oxford dictionary of current English (5th Edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B. X, Walberg, H. J., Welch, W. W., & Hattie, J. A. (1987). Syntheses of educational productivity research. Special issue of the International Journal of Educational Research, 11(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresov, C. (1989). Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 431–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D. E., Hart, A. W., & Blair, B. G. (1991). Still another approach to administrate: Chaos theory. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17, 430–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, D. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, M. (1996). Analysis of school self-evaluation and effective schools’ instruments. Enschede: OCTO, University of Twente (in Dutch).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. W., Rowe, K. J., & Holmes-Smith, P. (1995). Factors affecting students’ educational progress: multilevel modelling of educational effectiveness. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands, January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, D. (1994). School: A matter of choice. Paris: OECD/CERI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, W. H. A. (1995). Cross-level relationships within effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6, 146–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, R., Hoeben, W., & Guldemond, H. (1995). Denominatie en effectiviteit van schoolbesturen [Denomination and the effectiveness of school boards]. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 20(1), 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtveen, A. A. M., & Osinga, N. (1995). A case of school effectiveness: The Dutch national improvement project. Paper presented at the ICSEI Conference, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, C.C. (1986). What research tells the principal about educational leadership. Scientica Paedagogica Experimentalis, 23, 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A., & Kubicek, H. (1977). Organisation. Berlin: De Gruyter Lehrbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuw, A. C. J. de (1982). Organisaties: management, analyse, ontwerp en verandering. Een systeemvisie. Assen: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1982). The role of the elementary school principal in program improvement. Review of Educational Research, 52, 309–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leune, J. M. G. (1994). Onderwijskwaliteit en de autonomie van scholen. In B. P. M. Creemers (Ed.), Deregulering en de Kwaliteit van het Onderwijs. Groningen: RION.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. H. (1988). Cost-effectiveness and educational policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, D. K., & Lezotte, L. W. (1990). Unusually effective schools: A review and analysis of research and practice. Madison, Wis.: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslowski, R. (1995). Organisatiecultuur systematisch benaderd. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuret, D., & Scheerens, J. (1995). An international comparison of functional and territorial decentralization of public educational systems. Paper presented at AERA 1995, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. E., & Tucker, Sh. (1992). Leadership as a way of thinking. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, D. H. (1992). Microeconomics of school productions. Paper for the Economics of Education Section of the International Encyclopaedia of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, D., Hopkins, D., & Stoll, L. (1993). Linking school effectiveness knowledge and school improvement practices: Towards a synergy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4, 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. D. (1990). Should market forces control educational decision making? American Political Science Review, 84, 554–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, R. C, & Joyce, M. K. (1995). Qualitative research and implementation evaluation: a path to organizational learning. In T. E. Barone (Ed.), The uses of educational research (pp. 127–136). Special issue of the International Journal of Educational Research, 23(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P., Hillman, X, & Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research. London: OFSTED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1993). Basic school effectiveness research: items for a research agenda. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1994). The school-level context of instructional effectiveness: a comparison between school effectiveness and restructuring models. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 19(1), 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1995). School effectiveness as a research discipline. Paper presented at the ICSEI Congress, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands, January 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (1996). Theoretically embedded principles of effective schooling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. J. (1997). The foundations of Educational Effectiveness. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1995). School effectiveness in the Netherlands; research, policy and practice. In B. P. M. Creemers & N. Osinga (Eds.), Country reports ICSEI 1995 [pp. 81–106]. Leeuwarden: Gemeenschappelijk Centrum voor Onderwijsbegeleiding.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., Vermeulen, C. J. A. J., & Pelgrum, W. J. (1989). Generalizability of school and instructional effectiveness indicators across nations. In B. P. M. Creemers & J. Scheerens (Eds.), Developments in school effectiveness research. Special issue of the International Journal of Educational Research, 13(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1964). Administrative behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S. (1995). Attempting to enhance students’ learning through innovative programs: the case for schools evolving into high reliability organizations. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 67–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S. C, & Slavin, R. E. (1992). A hierarchical longitudinal model for elementary school effects. In B. P. M. Creemers & G. J. Reezigt (Eds.), Evaluation of effectiveness. ICO-Publication 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lidt de Jeude, X, & Brouwer, T. (1992). Kleine oorzaken, grote gevolgen: een inleiding op de chaostheorie. In C. van Dijkum & D. de Tombe (Eds.), Gamma chaos: Onzekerheden en Orde in de Menswetenschappen. Bloemendaal: Aramith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. C, Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1993). Toward a knowledge base for school learning. Naam tijdschrift 63(3), 249–294.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheerens, J. (2005). The School Effectiveness Knowledge Base as a Guide for School Improvement. In: Hopkins, D. (eds) The Practice and Theory of School Improvement. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4452-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics