Skip to main content

Ten Major Premises for a Holistic Conception of Multifunctional Landscapes Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 269–284

  • Chapter
Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 6))

  • 1820 Accesses

Abstract

The object of this paper is to present 10 major premises serving as a holistic conception for research on multifunctional landscapes (MFLs). Such a theory should become an integral part of the conceptual foundation of transdisciplinary goal-oriented and mission-driven landscape research. Based on a dynamic systems view, emerging from the recent paradigm shifts and insights from findings on complexity and wholeness, MFLs should be conceived as tangible, mixed natural and cultural interacting systems. They are the concrete, self-transcendent and self-organizing Gestalt systems of our total human ecosystem. Ranging from the smallest mappable ecotope to the global ecosphere landscape, they should be studied, upscaled, managed and evaluated with a biperspectivable systems view. For this purpose MFLs have to be treated simultaneously as products of material, natural biogeophysical systems and as mental, cognitive noospheric systems. This can be achieved with the help of innovative transdisciplinary approaches and research methods, in close cooperation among landscape researchers from natural sciences, social sciences, the humanities and the arts, as well as the professionals involved in all phases of land use decision. By adopting such a transdisciplinary and integrative approach towards the landscape as a whole, landscape ecologists could take part in such joint studies and projects, not only as narrow specialists in their own field of expertise as ecologists or geographers. They could help bridge the gaps between all biological and human ecological aspects, related to land use. Thereby they could play a useful role in ensuring the future of healthy, attractive and stable MFLs as part of the creation of post-industrial symbiotic relations between human society and nature. © 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen TF, Hoekstra TW (1992) Toward a Unified Ecology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allesch CG (1990) The space of landscape and the space of geography. In: Svoboda H (ed.), Cultural Aspects of Landscape. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 17–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antrop M, Van Eetvelde V (2000) Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape Urban Plann. 50, 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohm D (1980) Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge and Kegan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm D, Peat DF (1987) Science, Order, and Creativity. A Dramatic Look at the Roots of Science and Life. Bantam Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright C (2000) Anticipating environmental surprises. In: Brown LR, Flavin C, French H (eds), State of the World 2000. A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society. Norton & Company, New York, pp 22–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR, 1996. The acceleration of history. In: Brown LR et al. (eds), State of the World 1996. A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society. Norton & Company, New York, pp 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown LR, Flavin C, French H (eds), 1999. State of the World 1999. A Worldwatch Institute Report on Progress Toward a Sustainable Society. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (1996) The Web of Life. A New Understanding of Living Systems. Anchor Books Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Castri F (1997) Editorial: landscape ecology in a changing globalized environment. Landscape Ecol. 12, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl VE (1969) Reductionism and nihilism. In: Koestler A, Smithies JR (eds), Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences. Hutchinson of London, London, pp 396–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann WD (2000) Realizing sustainable development with the information society—the holistic double-gain-link approach. Landscape Urban Plann. 50, 179–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossmann WD, Naveh Z (2000) Transdisciplinary challenges for regional sustainable development toward the post-industrial information society. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Vienna, 3–6 May, pp 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling J (1996) Surprise for science, resilience for ecosystems and incentives for people. Ecol. Appl. 6, 733–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling J, Berkes CS, Folke FC (1999) Science, sustainability and resources management. In: Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (eds), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IALE Mission (1998) IALE Mission statement. IALE Bull. 16, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E (1970) Inter- and transdisciplinarity university: a systems approach to education and innovation. Policy Sci. 1, 403–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E (1976) Self-transcendence: new light on the evolutionary paradigm. In: Jantsch E Waddington CW (eds), Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 9–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch E (1980) The Self-Organizing Universe. Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of Evolution. Pergamon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler A (1969) Beyond atomism and holism—the concept of the holon. In: Koestler A, Smithies JR (eds), Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences. Hutchinson of London, London, pp 192–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1996) The Structure of the Scientific Revolution, 3rd Edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1972) Introduction to Systems Philosophy: Toward a New Paradigm of Contemporary Thought. Harper Torchbooks, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1987) Evolution: The Grand Synthesis. New Science Library, Shambhala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (1994) The Choice: Evolution or Extinction. A Thinking Person’s Guide to Global Issues. Putnam, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo E (2000) Macroshift 2001–2010. Creating the Future in the Early 21st Century. San Jose, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leser H (1991) Landschaftsoekologie. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1999). Towards a science of ecological management. Conserv. Ecol. 3, 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B-L (2000a) Why is the holistic approach becoming so important in landscape ecology? Landscape Urban Plann. 50, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li BL (2000b) Fractal geometry applications in description and analysis of patch patterns and patch dynamics. Ecol. Model. 132, 353–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle JT (1994) Regenerative Design for Sustainable Development. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOSES (2000) Modeling Sustainable Development in the European Information Society (MOSES). EU Programme Environment and Climate 1994–1998, Area 4. Human Dimensions and Environmental Change, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassauer JI (1990) In: Svoboda H (ed.), Cultural Aspects of Landscape. Proceedings of the Statements at the Closing Session of the First International Conference on Cultural Aspects of Landscape. Pudoc, Wageningen, p 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1982) Landscape Ecology as an Emerging Branch of Human Ecosystem Science. Academic Press, London. Adv. Ecol. Res. 12, 189–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1990) Landscape ecology as a bridge between bio-ecology and human ecology. In: Svobodova H (ed.), Cultural Aspects of Landscape. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1991b) Biodiversity and ecological heterogeneity of Mediterranean uplands. Economica Montana: Linea Ecologica 24, 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1995a) Transdisciplinary landscape-ecological education and the future of post-industrial landscapes. Bolletino del Museo dir Store Naturale della Linigiana, 9. Supplemento, Allau, pp 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1995b) Interactions of landscapes and cultures. Landscape Urban Plann. 32, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (1998) Culture and landscape conservation—a landscape ecological perspective. In: Gopal B, Pathak PS, Saxena KG (eds), Ecology Today: An Anthology of Contemporary Ecological Research. International Scientific Publications, New Delhi, pp 19–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2000a) Transdisciplinary challenges for education towards regional development. In: Braunegg S, Narodoslawsky M (eds), Proceedings of Conference on Higher Education for Sustainable Regional Development. SUSTAIN, Graz, pp. 42–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2000b) What is holistic landscape ecology? A conceptual introduction. Landscape Urban Plann. 50, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z (2001) Multifunctional, self-organizing biosphere landscapes and the future of our total human ecosystem—a new paradigm for transdisciplinary landscape ecology, World Futures 60: 469–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z, Lieberman AS (1994) Landscape Ecology Theory and Applications, 2nd Edition. Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill RV, Kahn JR (2000) Homo economus as a keystone species. BioScience 50, 333–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orr DW (1992) Ecological Literacy. Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. State University of New York Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankow W (1976) Openness as self-transcendence. In: Jantsch E, Waddington CW (eds), Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 16–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat DF (1997) Infinite Potential. The Life and Times of David Bohm. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D (1992) Conserving biological diversity in agricultural systems. BioScience 42, 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I (1976) Order through fluctuations: self-organization and social systems. In: Jantsch E, Waddington CW (eds), Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 93–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine I, Stengers I (1984) Order out of Chaos. Man’s Dialogue with Nature. New Science Library, Shamabala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieferle RP (1997) Rückblick auf die Natur. Eine Geschichte des Menschen und seiner Umwelt. Luchterhand Literaturverlag, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1962) The architecture of complexity. In: Hierarchy Theory. George Braziller, New York, pp 3–27. Proc. Philos. Soc. 106, 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith MJ (1998) Ecologism Towards Ecological Citizenship. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s systems. Science 277, 494–499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg GM (1975) Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss PA (1969) The living system: determinism stratified. In: Koestler A, Smithies JR (eds), Beyond Reductionism: New Perspectives in the Life Sciences. Hutchinson of London, London, pp 3–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • WLO (1998) A new identity for landscape ecology in Europe. A research strategy for the next decade: outlines formulated at the European congress. Landscape ecology: things to do, Amsterdam, 6–10 October. The Dutch Association of Landscape Ecology, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld I (1995) Land Ecology. An Introduction to Landscape Ecology as a Base for Land Evaluation, Land Management and Conservation. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zev Naveh (1919), PhD, is Professor Emeritus in landscape ecology at the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa. Until 1965 he worked as range and pasture specialist in Israel and in Tanzania. His research at the Technion was devoted to human impacts on Mediterranean landscapes, fire ecology and dynamic conservation management, introduction of drought resistant plants for multibeneficial landscape restoration and beautification. Presently he is involved chiefly in studying theoretical aspects of holistic landscape ecology and sustainable development for the information society. He was the founder and director of the Ecological Garden of the Technion and the cofounder and scientific director of the first Environmental Teaching Project in Israel, and the head of a IUCN working group for landscape conservation. He has been visiting professor and guest lecturer in many universities and keynote speaker in international conferences and is member of the editorial board of Landscape Ecology, Restoration Ecology and Mediterranean Ecology. Professor Naveh has published over 200 scientific publications and is author and co-author of several Hebrew and English books, including the first English monography on landscape ecology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naveh, Z. (2007). Ten Major Premises for a Holistic Conception of Multifunctional Landscapes Landscape and Urban Planning 57: 269–284. In: Transdisciplinary Challenges in Landscape Ecology and Restoration Ecology. Landscape Series, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4422-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics