Advertisement

Some Possible Directions for Research

  • JULIEN TEITLER
  • ASHER BEN-ARIEH
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 27)

Abstract

The previous chapters focus on a wide range of indicators of child well-being, their uses and potential uses, and numerous methods of data collection and dissemination. At the same time, the breadth of perspectives and range of examples for the measurement and use of indicators illustrates the lack of solid knowledge and consensus about what types of indicators are most salient to national and local policymakers, to program directors, and to academic constituencies. Furthermore, we still lack an understanding of the conditions (context and mode of dissemination) that lead to specific indicators having an impact. In this chapter, we attempt to identify important gaps in our knowledge of child indicators and suggest ways in which research can begin to fill those gaps. We also discuss how research can best make use of indicators.

Keywords

Public Opinion Positive Youth Development Russell Sage Foundation Shaping Policy Local Policymaker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aber, L.J. and Jones, S. (1997). Indicators of positive development in early childhood: improving concepts and measures. In Robert, M.H., Brown, B.V., and Prosser, W.R. (eds.), Indicators of Children's Well-being.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 395–408Google Scholar
  2. Appelbaum, L., Cuciti, P., Badar, C.V., Fairchild, M., and Kerns, P. (2004). State Legislative Perceptions of Kids Count. Baltimore: AECF. Available at http://www.aecf.org/ kidscount/pubs/state legislators 04.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Arieh, A. (2002). Evaluating the outcomes of programs versus monitoring well-being: a child-centered perspective. In Vecchiato, T., Maluccio, A.N., and Canali, C. (eds.), Evaluation in Child and Family Services: Comparative Client and Program perspective. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 150–160Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Arieh, A., Kaufman, H.N., Andrews, B.A., Goerge, R., Lee, B.J., and Aber, J.L. (2001). Measuring and Monitoring Children's Well Being. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics (2002). America's Children: Key-National Indicators of Well-being. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  6. Guzman, L., Lippman, L., and Moore, K.A. (2003). What Does the Public Know about Children's Economic and Demographic Characteristics? Washington, DC: Child Trends.Google Scholar
  7. Moore, K.A. (1997). Criteria for indicators of child well-being. In Hauser, R.M., Brown, B.B., and Prosser, W.R. (eds.). Indicators of Child Well-being.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 36–44Google Scholar
  8. Moore, K.A., Lippman, L., and Brown, B. (2004). Indicators of child well-being: the promise for positive youth development ANNALS, AAPSS, 591:125–145Google Scholar
  9. State Legislative Leaders Foundation (1995). State Legislative Leaders: Keys to Effective Legislation for Children and Families. Available at www.sllf.org.Google Scholar
  10. Wells, S.J. and Johnson, M.A. (2001). Selecting outcome measures for child welfare settings: lessons for use in performance management. Children and Youth Services Review, 23(2):169–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • JULIEN TEITLER
    • 1
  • ASHER BEN-ARIEH
    • 2
  1. 1.Columbia University School of Social WorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Paul Baerwald School of Social Work and Social WelfareHebrew University of JerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations