Skip to main content

DISABLED EMBODIMENT AND AN ETHIC OF CARE

  • Chapter
Bioethics in Cultural Contexts

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 28))

Abstract

Differently situated people understand things differently. One part of ‘situatedness’ is contributed by embodiment. Life as a particular embodiment means not only having experiences that are not shared by people with a different body, but also understanding these experiences in a way that is shaped by this bodily reality. The point of standpoint epistemology (Harding 1991, Hartsock 1998) for example, is that by virtue of their common situation, certain groups of individuals – women, blacks, the poor – will share a privileged perspective on the experience of oppression, one that differs from the perspective of a differently situated group – men, whites, the rich. A situated perspective will give rise to characteristic perceptions and interpretations, including perceptions and interpretations of moral issues. Ultimately this will modify a person’s moral evaluations and judgements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baier, A. “The need for more than justice.” In Justice and care: essential readings in feminist ethics. V. Held (ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C.; Mercer, G. and Shakespeare T. Exploring disability: a sociological introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, E.A. “Beyond either/or: Justice and care in the ethics of Albert Camus.” In Explorations in feminist ethics: theory and practice. E. Browning Cole and S. Coultrap-McQuin (eds.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. Situating the self: gender, community and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. Routledge: New York, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, T. On the edge of deaf culture: hearing children/deaf parents. [Annotated bibliography.] Alexandria, Virginia: Deaf Family Research press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corker, M. Deaf and disabled, or deafness disabled? Buckingham: Open University Press,1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crigger, N.J. “The trouble with caring: a review of 8 arguments against an ethic of care.” J Prof Nursing 1997, 13, 217–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, R.A. “Letting the deaf be Deaf: reconsidering the use of cochlear implants in prelingually deaf children.” Hastings Center Report 1997, 4, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, D.S. “Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future.” Hastings Center Report 1997, 2, 7–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R.S. “Care and respect.” In Explorations in feminist ethics: theory and practice. E. Browning Cole and S. Coultrap-McQuin (eds.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley, M.A. “Feminist theology and bioethics.” In On moral medicine: theological perspectives in medical ethics. S.E. Lammers and A. Verley (eds.). Grand Rapids/Oxford: WM Eerdmans Pub Co, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. “Moral orientation and moral development.” In Justice and care: essential readings in feminist ethics. V. Held (ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1995 36–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women's lives. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. Feminist standpoint revisited and other essays. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittay, E. Feder. Love's labor: essays on women, equality and dependency. New York, London: Routledge, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, P. and John, M. Deaf people as a minority group: the political process. Course D251, Issues in Deafness. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, H. The mask of benevolence: disabling the Deaf community. San Diego: DawnSignPress, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, J. Rosser. Quantification and the quest for medical certainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, A.; Hewison, J. and Mueller, R. “Prenatal diagnosis for inherited deafness-what is the potential demand?” J Genet Couns 2001, 10, 121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy, L. “A world of their own.” The Washington Post Magazine, Sunday 31 March 2002, W22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Hj. and Rehmann Sutter, C. Ethik und Gentherapie. Tübingen: Francke, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. Caring: a feminist approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, P. Mother father deaf: living between sound and silence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehmann-Sutter, C. “Contextual bioethics.” Perspektiven der Philosophie 1999, 25,315–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R. “Pair seeks IVF deaf gene test.” Herald Sun, June 30, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S.“Injustice in families: Assault and domination.” In Justice and care: essential readings in feminist ethics. V. Held (ed.). Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, J. Leach. “A postmodern disorder: moral encounters with molecular models of disability.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying disability theory. M. Corker and T. Shakespeare (eds.). London: Continuum, 2002, 48–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, J.L. and Tittle, M.D. “Deaf parents and their hearing children.” J Deaf Studies Deaf Educ 2000, 5, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, A. “Defiantly deaf.” New York Times, August 28, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S.J. et al. “The attitudes of deaf and hearing individuals towards genetic testing of hearing loss.” J Med Genet 2002, 39, 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. and Corker, M. “A journey around the social model.” In Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying disability theory. M. Corker and T. Shakespeare (eds.). London: Continuum, 2002, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.M. “The place of care in ethical theory.” J Med Philos 1998, 23, 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M. Urban. Moral understandings: a feminist study in ethics. New York, London: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, L. and Palmer, J.G. The ethics of human gene therapy. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wivel, N. and Walters, L. “Germline gene modifications and disease prevention: some medical and ethical perspectives.” Science 1993, 262, 533–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

SCULLY, J.L. (2006). DISABLED EMBODIMENT AND AN ETHIC OF CARE. In: Rehmann-Sutter, C., Düwell, M., Mieth, D. (eds) Bioethics in Cultural Contexts. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 28. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4241-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics