Skip to main content

Eccentric Agreement and Multiple Case Checking

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 65))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2002. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark. 1996. The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, Josef. 1984. ‘COMP in Bavarian syntax.’ The Linguistic Review 3, 209-274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béjar, Susana, and Rezac, Milan. (to appear). ‘Cyclic Agree and the derivation of PCC effects.’ Selected papers from LSRL XXXII. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria. 1987. ‘On the semantics of the Greenlandic antipassive and related constructions.’ IJAL 53, 194-231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria. 1994. Case, Scope and Binding. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittner, Maria, and Hale, Ken. 1996. ‘Ergativity: Toward a theory of a heterogeneous class.’ Linguistic Inquiry 27, 531-604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1995. Morphosyntax: the syntax of verbal inflection, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1998. ‘Pseudo-ergativity in Chukotko-Kamchatkan agreement systems.’ In Lea Nash, ed., Ergativity: Recherche linguistiques de Vincennes, vol. 27, pp. 21-44. Saint Denis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. ‘A-chains at the PF-interface: Copies and ‘Covert’ Movement.’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20, 197-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. ‘Seven prefix-suffix asymmetries in Itel’men.’ In Mary Andronis, Christopher Ball, Heidi Elston and Sylvain Neuvel, eds. CLS 37: The Panels. Papers from the 37th Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, vol. 32, pp. 205-219. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Wurmbrand, Susi. 2002. ‘Notes on Agreement in Itelmen. Linguistic Discovery 1.1, http://linguistic-discovery.dartmouth.edu/WebObjects/Linguistics.

  • Bok-Bennema, Reineke. 1991. Case and Agreement in Inuit. Berlin: Foris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonet, Eulàlia. 1994. ‘The Person-Case Constraint: a morphological approach.’ In Heidi Harley and Colin Phillips, eds. The Morphology-Syntax Connection, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 33-52. Cambridge: MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bošković, Željko. 2002. ‘On multiple wh-fronting.’ Linguistic Inquiry 33, 351-383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1993. ‘A minimalist program for linguistic theory.’ In Ken Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 1-52. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam. 2000. ‘Minimalist inquiries: The framework.’ In Roger Martin, David Michaels and Juan Uriagereka, eds. Step by step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, pp. 89-155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikken, Marcel den. 1995. Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, Robert M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, Michael. 1999. A Grammar of Chukchi, Ph.D. Dissertation, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embick, David. 2000. ‘Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect.’ Linguistic Inquiry 31, 185-230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortescue, Michael. 1984. West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Steven. 1998. ‘Clitics in Slavic.’ Paper presented at Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax: “The State of the Art”, Spencer, Indiana (June 1998), available at: http://www.indiana.edu/∼slavconf/linguistics/index.html

  • Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1993. Causatives and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Approach. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Ken. 2002. ‘Eccentric agreement.’ In Beatriz Fernández and Pablo Albizu, eds. Kasu eta Komunztaduraren gainean [On Case and Agreement], pp. 15-48. Vitoria-Gasteiz: Euskal Herriko Unibetsitatea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Marantz, Alec. 1993. ‘Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection.’ In Ken Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, eds. The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, pp. 111-176. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halle, Morris, and Hale, Ken. 1997. Chukchi transitive and antipassive constructions. Ms., Cambridge, Mass: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, Alana. 1996. ‘Ergativity.’ Glot International 2:3-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard. 1975. French Syntax. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinsky, Issac S., Nedjalkov, Vladimir, and Polinskaja, Maria S. 1988. ‘Antipassive in Chuckchee: oblique object, object incorporation, zero object.’ In Masayoshi Shibatani, ed. Passive and Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Vivian. 2001. ‘A way to undo A-movement.’ In Karine Megerdoomian and Leora A. Bar-El, eds. Proceedings of WCCFL 20, pp. 358-371. Somerville, MA:Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Anoop. 1993. ‘The Ergativity Parameter: have-be alternation, word order and split ergativity.’ Proceedings of NELS 24, pp. 317-331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marantz, Alec. 1991. ‘Case and licensing.’ Proceedings of ESCOL ’ 91, pp. 234-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, Léa. 1995. Portée argumentale et marquage casuel dans les langues SOV et dans les langues ergatives: l’exemple du géorgien. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. 1976. ‘Diathesen und Satzstruktur im Tschuktschischen.’ Studia Grammatica 13:181-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David. 1998. ‘Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation.’ In Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis and David Pesetsky, eds. Is the best good enough? pp. 337-383. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and MITWPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polinsky, Maria S. 1990. ‘Subject incorporation: evidence from Chukchee.’ In Katarzyna Dziwirek, Patrick Farrell and Errapel Mejías-Bikandi, eds. Grammatical relations: a cross-theoretical perspective, pp. 349-364. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Lisa A. 1996. Toward Logical Form: An Exploration of the Role of Syntax in Semantics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Norvin. 1998. ‘The Principle of Minimal Compliance.’ Linguistic Inquiry 29:599-629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in Language: Interactions and Architectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochette, Anne. 1988. Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Romance Sentential Complementation. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouveret, Alain, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1980. ‘Specifying reference to the Subject: French causatives and conditions on representations.’ Linguistic Inquiry 11:97-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skorik, Piotr Ja. 1977. Грaмм чукоґского язьιкa, чaсґь II: глaгoл, нaречuе, служебньιе словa ґuк [Grammar of Chukchi, vol II: verb, adverb and auxiliary words]. Leningrad: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Andrew. 2000. ‘Agreement morphology in Chukotkan.’ In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Oskar E. Pfeiffer and Markus A. Pochtrager, eds. Morphological analysis in comparison, pp. 191-222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Gregory T. 1993. ‘On rules of referral.’ Language 69, 449-479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharram, Douglas. 2003. On the Interpretation of (Un)certain Indefinites in Inuktitut and Related Languages. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. ‘How to describe inflection.’ Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 13, 372-386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

BOBALJIK, J.D., BRANIGAN, P. (2006). Eccentric Agreement and Multiple Case Checking. In: JOHNS, A., MASSAM, D., NDAYIRAGIJE, J. (eds) ERGATIVITY. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 65. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4188-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics