Abstract
We analyzed meta-community structure of bdelloid rotifers colonizing mosses along an 80 meter section of Rio Valnava in NW Italy. Bdelloid rotifers are small animals living associated with a substratum; colonization in bdelloids can be produced by active animals moving along the riverbed, or by passive dormant propagules, moved by wind. To detect which kind of colonization might be stronger at different spatial scales, we designed a spatially nested sampling experiment at three hierarchical levels: (1) single sample, (2) 10 communities inside each pool, (3) complete section of 10 pools. Assessing species richness and species similarity of communities, and coherence and nestedness of bdelloid meta-communities, we found that different forces may drive species composition at different spatial scales: at the largest scale, colonization of propagules may over-ride direct dispersal between pools, while at the scale of the single pool, differential movements of species give a nested structure to the meta-communities. The number of species increased as the level of analysis increased, even though this study was carried out along only a small stream section.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amarasekare, P., 2000. The geometry of coexistence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71: 1–31.
Arita, H. T. & P. Rodríguez, 2002. Geographic range, turnover rate and the scaling of species diversity. Ecography 25: 541–550.
Bilton, D. T., J. R. Freeland & B. Okamura, 2001. Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 159–181.
Bohonak, A. J. & D. G. Jenkins, 2003. Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecology Letters 6: 783–796.
Cáceres, C. E. & D. A. Soluk, 2002. Blowing in the wind: a field test of overland dispersal and colonization by aquatic invertebrates. Oecologia 131: 402–408.
Chase, J. M., 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136: 489–498.
Cornell, H. V., 1999. Unsaturation and regional influences on species richness in ecological communities: a review of the evidence. Ecoscience 6: 303–315.
Cottenie, K. & L. De Meester, 2003. Connectivity and cladoceran species richness in a metacommunity of shallow lakes. Freshwater Biology 48: 823–832.
Cottenie, K., E. Michels, N. Nuytten & L. De Meester, 2003. Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local process in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84: 991–1000.
Cutler, A. H., 1994. Nested biotas and biological conservationmetrics, mechanisms and meaning of nestedness. Landscape and Urban Planning 28: 73–82.
Davidar, P., K. Yogananad, T. Ganesh, & S. Devy, 2002. Distribution of forest birds and butterflies in Andaman islands, Bay of Bengal: nested patterns and process. Ecography 25: 5–16.
De Meester, L., A. Gómez, B. Okamura & K. Schwenk, 2002. The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23: 121–135.
Elliott, J. M., 2003. A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 48: 1652–1668.
Fischer, J. & D. B. Lindenmayer, 2002. Treating the nestedness temperature calculator as a ‘black box’ can lead to false conclusions. Oikos 99: 193–199.
Forbes, A. E. & J.N. Chase, 2002. The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. Oikos 96: 433–440.
Gaston, K. J., 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405: 220–227.
Jenkins, D. G. & M.O. Underwood, 1998. Zooplankton may not disperse readily in wind, rain, or waterfowl. Hydrobiologia 387/388: 15–21.
Kneitel, J. M. & T. E. Miller, 2003. Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. American Naturalist 162: 165–171.
Lawton, J. H., 1999. Are there general rules in ecology? Oikos 84: 177–192.
Leibold, M. A. & G. M. Mikkelson, 2002. Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure. Oikos 97: 237–250.
Linhart, J., M. Fiuraskova & V. Uvira, 2002a. Moss-and mineral substrata-dwelling meiobenthos in two different low-order streams. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 154: 543–560.
Linhart, J., S. Vlckova & V. Uvira, 2002b. Bryophytes as a special mesohabitat for meiofauna in a rip-rapped channel. River Research and Applications 18: 321–330.
Lomolino, M. V., 1996. Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: Selective immigrations or extinctions? Journal of Biogeography 23: 699–703.
Loo, S. E., R. Mac Nally & G. P. Quinn, 2002. An experimental examination of colonization as a generator of biotic nestedness. Oecologia 132: 118–124.
Mac Nally, R., G. Horrocks, & A. F. Bennett, 2002. Nestedness in fragmented landscapes: birds of the box-ironbark forests of south-eastern Australia. Ecography 25: 651–660.
Mouquet, N. & M. Loreau, 2002. Coexistence in a competitive metacommunity: the regional similarity hypothesis. American Naturalist 159: 420–426.
Patterson, B. D. & W. Atmar, 1986. Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28: 65–82.
Rundle, S. D., A. Foggo, V. Choiseul & D. T. Bilton, 2002. Are distribution patterns linked to dispersal mechanism? An investigation using pond invertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 47: 1571–1581.
Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1998a. Small-sized invertebrates in a gravel stream: community structure and variability of benthic rotifers. Freshwater Biology 39: 25–39.
Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1998b. Rotifers in interstitial sediments. Hydrobiologia 387/388: 231–240.
Shorrocks, B. & J. G. Sevenster, 1995. Explaining local species diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences 260: 305–309.
Shurin, J. B., 2000. Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81: 3074–3086.
Taneyhill, D. E., 2000. Metapopulation dynamics of multiple species: the geometry of competition in a fragmented habitat. Ecological Monographs 70: 495–516.
Worthen, W. B., M. T. Jones & R. M. Jetton, 1998. Community structure and environmental stress: desiccation promotes nestedness in mycophagous fly communities. Oikos 81: 45–54.
Wright, D. H., B. D. Patterson, G. M. Mikkelson, A. Cutler & W. Atmar, 1998. A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113: 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fontaneto, D., Melone, G., Ricci, C. (2005). Connectivity and nestedness of the meta-community structure of moss dwelling bdelloid rotifers along a stream. In: Segers, H., Martens, K. (eds) Aquatic Biodiversity II. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 180. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4111-X_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4111-X_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3745-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4111-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)