Skip to main content

Connectivity and nestedness of the meta-community structure of moss dwelling bdelloid rotifers along a stream

  • Chapter
Aquatic Biodiversity II

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 180))

Abstract

We analyzed meta-community structure of bdelloid rotifers colonizing mosses along an 80 meter section of Rio Valnava in NW Italy. Bdelloid rotifers are small animals living associated with a substratum; colonization in bdelloids can be produced by active animals moving along the riverbed, or by passive dormant propagules, moved by wind. To detect which kind of colonization might be stronger at different spatial scales, we designed a spatially nested sampling experiment at three hierarchical levels: (1) single sample, (2) 10 communities inside each pool, (3) complete section of 10 pools. Assessing species richness and species similarity of communities, and coherence and nestedness of bdelloid meta-communities, we found that different forces may drive species composition at different spatial scales: at the largest scale, colonization of propagules may over-ride direct dispersal between pools, while at the scale of the single pool, differential movements of species give a nested structure to the meta-communities. The number of species increased as the level of analysis increased, even though this study was carried out along only a small stream section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amarasekare, P., 2000. The geometry of coexistence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 71: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arita, H. T. & P. Rodríguez, 2002. Geographic range, turnover rate and the scaling of species diversity. Ecography 25: 541–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilton, D. T., J. R. Freeland & B. Okamura, 2001. Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohonak, A. J. & D. G. Jenkins, 2003. Ecological and evolutionary significance of dispersal by freshwater invertebrates. Ecology Letters 6: 783–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cáceres, C. E. & D. A. Soluk, 2002. Blowing in the wind: a field test of overland dispersal and colonization by aquatic invertebrates. Oecologia 131: 402–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, J. M., 2003. Community assembly: when should history matter? Oecologia 136: 489–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, H. V., 1999. Unsaturation and regional influences on species richness in ecological communities: a review of the evidence. Ecoscience 6: 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie, K. & L. De Meester, 2003. Connectivity and cladoceran species richness in a metacommunity of shallow lakes. Freshwater Biology 48: 823–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottenie, K., E. Michels, N. Nuytten & L. De Meester, 2003. Zooplankton metacommunity structure: regional vs. local process in highly interconnected ponds. Ecology 84: 991–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. H., 1994. Nested biotas and biological conservationmetrics, mechanisms and meaning of nestedness. Landscape and Urban Planning 28: 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidar, P., K. Yogananad, T. Ganesh, & S. Devy, 2002. Distribution of forest birds and butterflies in Andaman islands, Bay of Bengal: nested patterns and process. Ecography 25: 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meester, L., A. Gómez, B. Okamura & K. Schwenk, 2002. The monopolization hypothesis and the dispersal-gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms. Acta Oecologica 23: 121–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. M., 2003. A comparative study of the dispersal of 10 species of stream invertebrates. Freshwater Biology 48: 1652–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. & D. B. Lindenmayer, 2002. Treating the nestedness temperature calculator as a ‘black box’ can lead to false conclusions. Oikos 99: 193–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, A. E. & J.N. Chase, 2002. The role of habitat connectivity and landscape geometry in experimental zooplankton metacommunities. Oikos 96: 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, K. J., 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405: 220–227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, D. G. & M.O. Underwood, 1998. Zooplankton may not disperse readily in wind, rain, or waterfowl. Hydrobiologia 387/388: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel, J. M. & T. E. Miller, 2003. Dispersal rates affect species composition in metacommunities of Sarracenia purpurea inquilines. American Naturalist 162: 165–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. H., 1999. Are there general rules in ecology? Oikos 84: 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold, M. A. & G. M. Mikkelson, 2002. Coherence, species turnover, and boundary clumping: elements of meta-community structure. Oikos 97: 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart, J., M. Fiuraskova & V. Uvira, 2002a. Moss-and mineral substrata-dwelling meiobenthos in two different low-order streams. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 154: 543–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart, J., S. Vlckova & V. Uvira, 2002b. Bryophytes as a special mesohabitat for meiofauna in a rip-rapped channel. River Research and Applications 18: 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino, M. V., 1996. Investigating causality of nestedness of insular communities: Selective immigrations or extinctions? Journal of Biogeography 23: 699–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loo, S. E., R. Mac Nally & G. P. Quinn, 2002. An experimental examination of colonization as a generator of biotic nestedness. Oecologia 132: 118–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally, R., G. Horrocks, & A. F. Bennett, 2002. Nestedness in fragmented landscapes: birds of the box-ironbark forests of south-eastern Australia. Ecography 25: 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouquet, N. & M. Loreau, 2002. Coexistence in a competitive metacommunity: the regional similarity hypothesis. American Naturalist 159: 420–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, B. D. & W. Atmar, 1986. Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28: 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rundle, S. D., A. Foggo, V. Choiseul & D. T. Bilton, 2002. Are distribution patterns linked to dispersal mechanism? An investigation using pond invertebrate assemblages. Freshwater Biology 47: 1571–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1998a. Small-sized invertebrates in a gravel stream: community structure and variability of benthic rotifers. Freshwater Biology 39: 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid-Araya, J. M., 1998b. Rotifers in interstitial sediments. Hydrobiologia 387/388: 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, B. & J. G. Sevenster, 1995. Explaining local species diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B — Biological Sciences 260: 305–309.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shurin, J. B., 2000. Dispersal limitation, invasion resistance and the structure of pond zooplankton communities. Ecology 81: 3074–3086.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneyhill, D. E., 2000. Metapopulation dynamics of multiple species: the geometry of competition in a fragmented habitat. Ecological Monographs 70: 495–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, W. B., M. T. Jones & R. M. Jetton, 1998. Community structure and environmental stress: desiccation promotes nestedness in mycophagous fly communities. Oikos 81: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. H., B. D. Patterson, G. M. Mikkelson, A. Cutler & W. Atmar, 1998. A comparative analysis of nested subset patterns of species composition. Oecologia 113: 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fontaneto, D., Melone, G., Ricci, C. (2005). Connectivity and nestedness of the meta-community structure of moss dwelling bdelloid rotifers along a stream. In: Segers, H., Martens, K. (eds) Aquatic Biodiversity II. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 180. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4111-X_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics