Advertisement

Ramsey’s Ramsey-sentences

  • Stathis Psillos
Chapter
Part of the Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook [2004] book series (VCIY, volume 12)

Keywords

Primary System Definite Description Explicit Definition Secondary System Empirical Adequacy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. B. Braithwaite, “Professor Eddington’s Gifford Lectures”, in: Mind, 38, 1929, pp.409–35.Google Scholar
  2. R. B. Braithwaite, “Critical Notice: The Philosophy of Physical Science”, in: Mind, 49, 1940, pp.455–66.Google Scholar
  3. Rudolf Carnap, “Replies and Systematic Expositions”, in: P. Schilpp (Ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, La Salle IL: Open Court, 1963, pp.859–1013Google Scholar
  4. William Demopoulos & Michael Friedman, “Critical Notice: Bertrand Russell’s The Analysis of Matter: its Historical Context and Contemporary Interest”, in: Philosophy of Science, 52, 1985 pp.621–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. William Demopoulos, “On the Rational Reconstruction of Our Theoretical Knowledge”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 54, 2003a, pp.371–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. William Demopoulos, “Russell’s Structuralism and the Absolute Description of the World”, in: N Grifin (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003b.Google Scholar
  7. Arthur S. Eddington, “Group Structure in Physical Science”, in: Mind, 50, 1941, pp.268–79.Google Scholar
  8. Jane English, “Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey”, in: Journal of Philosophy, 70, 1973, pp.453–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jeff Ketland, “Empirical Adequacy and Ramsification”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 2004, pp.287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rae Langton, Kantian Humility. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1998.Google Scholar
  11. David Lewis, “Putnam’s Paradox”, in: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 62, 1984, pp.221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grover Maxwell, “Theories, Perception and Structural Realism”, in: R. Colodny (Ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1970a, pp.3–34.Google Scholar
  13. Grover, Maxwell, “Structural Realism and the Meaning of Theoretical Terms”, in: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, IV, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1970b, pp.181–192.Google Scholar
  14. M. H. A. Newman, “Mr. Russell’s ‘Causal Theory of Perception’”, in: Mind, 37, 1928, pp.137–148Google Scholar
  15. Alex Orenstein, W V Quine. Chesham: Acumen 2002.Google Scholar
  16. David Papineau, “Theory-Dependent Terms”, in: Philosophy of Science, 63, 1996, pp.1–20.Google Scholar
  17. Stathis Psillos, Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London & New York: Routledge 1999.Google Scholar
  18. Stathis Psillos, “Carnap, the Ramsey-Sentence and Realistic Empiricism”’, in: Erkenntnis, 52, 2000 pp.253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stathis Psillos, “An Introduction to Carnap’s ‘Theoretical Concepts in Science’” (together with Carna “Theoretical Concepts in Science”), in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 31 2000b, pp.151–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Stathis Psillos, “Is Structural Realism Possible?”, in: Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 68, 2001 pp.S13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stathis Psillos, “Scientific Realism & Metaphysics”, in Ratio, 18, 2005Google Scholar
  22. Frank Ramsey, The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Essays. (Edited by R. B. Braithwaite). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1931.Google Scholar
  23. Frank Ramsey, Notes on Philosophy, Probability and Mathematics. (Edited by M. C. Galavotti). Bibliopolis 1991.Google Scholar
  24. William W. Rozeboom, “Studies in the Empiricist Theory of Scientific Meaning”, in: Philosophy Science, 27, 1960, pp.359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Matter. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1927.Google Scholar
  26. Mark Sainsbury, Russell. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul 1979.Google Scholar
  27. Nils-Eric Sahlin, The Philosophy of F P Ramsey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1990.Google Scholar
  28. Moritz Schlick, General Theory of Knowledge. (2nd German Edition, A. E. Blumberg trans.). Wien & New York: Springer-Verlag 1918/1925.Google Scholar
  29. Moritz Schlick, “Form and Content: An Introduction to Philosophical Thinking”, 1932, in: Mori Schlick’s Philosophical Papers, Vol. II, Dordrecht: D. Reidel P. C., 1979, pp.285–369.Google Scholar
  30. Graham Solomon, “An Addendum to Demopoulos and Friedman (1985)”, in: Philosophy of Science 56, 1989, pp.497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. J. F. A. K. van Benthem, “Ramsey Eliminability”, in: Studia Logica, 37, 1978, pp.321–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. James van Cleve, Themes From Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  33. John Winnie, “The Implicit Definition of Theoretical Terms”, in: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 18, 1967, pp.223–9.Google Scholar
  34. John Winnie, “Theoretical Analyticity”, in: R. Cohen and M. Wartofsky (Eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol.8, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1970, pp.289–305.Google Scholar
  35. Elie Zahar, Poincaré’s Philosophy: From Conventionalism to Phenomenology. La Salle IL: Open Court 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stathis Psillos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and History of ScienceUniversity of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations