Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Information Retrieval Series ((INRE,volume 19))

7. Conclusions

Developing and supporting human search capabilities is at least equally important as developing the capabilities of search engines. Existing academic research suggests that particularly inexperienced users searching the Web utilize only a modest subset of the capabilities that the tools offer and are weak at understanding their real information needs, articulating them in a way that allows for effective searches, and interpreting search results in the context of those needs. This clearly suggests that training users to become better searchers is a worthwhile effort, and that understanding what makes certain search interventions successful and others not is vitally important for enabling users to make effective use of their time.

Our review of existing search training literature revealed relatively broadly scattered efforts that, to a large extent, were not programmatic or focused on developing well-defined theoretical models. This makes it difficult to integrate findings from different studies into cohesive bodies of work that would support the development and evaluation of new training interventions. In this chapter, we propose three approaches to using existing areas of research as a theoretical foundation for future work. Namely: a) understanding the nature of search processes is very important if we want to understand search training, because different stages of the search process require different training approaches; b) a thorough analysis of search errors forms a solid foundation for training approaches that helps users avoid the common errors; and c) training research from related disciplines, such as information systems, can be used to introduce new theoretical perspectives and suggest models that are also potentially helpful in search training.

Search is pervasive in modern life and performing effective online searches is a fundamentally important literacy skill, not only for 21st century knowledge professionals but for every individual who relies on material available from online sources. Understanding how we, as a research community, can help people become effective searchers is, therefore, of critical importance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdulla, G., Liu, B., and Fox, E. A. (1998). Searching the World-Wide Web: Implications From Studying Different User Behavior. Paper presented at the WebNet98 Conference, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. L. (2001). Boolean Browsing in an Information System: An Experimental Test. Information Technology and Libraries, 20(1), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, M. (1985). An Exploratory Paradigm for Online Information Retrieval. Paper Presented at the Sixth P International Research Forum in Information Science (IRFIS 6), Frascati, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (1996). Why Are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(7), 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, H. C., Tan, B. C. Y, and Wei, K. K. (1999). Three Important Determinants of User Performance for Database Retrieval. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 51(5), 895–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, G. Y. T. (2003). Educational Workshop Improved Information-Seeking Skills, Knowledge, Attitudes and the Search Outcome of Hospital Clinicians: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20, 22–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloyd, B. and Spilker, B. (2000). Confirmation Bias in Tax Information Search: A Comparison of Law Students and Accounting Students. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 22, 60–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colaric, S. M. (2003). Instruction for Web Searching: An Empirical Study. College and Research Libraries, 64(2), 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. (1995). Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. (1988). Getting Beyond Boole. Information Processing and Management, 24(3), 243–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1993). Blow Up the Corporate Library. International Journal of Information Management, 13, 405–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. D. and Yi, M. I. (2004). Improving Computer Skill Training: Behavior Modeling, Symbolic Mental Rehearsal, and the Role of Knowledge Structures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debowski, S. (2002). Developing Effective Electronic Information Seekers. Australian Journal of Management, 27, 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detlor, B. (1999). Leveraging the Corporate Library Through Web User Training. Library Management, 20(7), 393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, D. (2005). Search Engine Users. Washington, DC: Pew Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallows, D., Rainie, L., and Mudd, G. (2004). Data Memo: The Popularity and Importance of Search Engines. Washington, DC: Pew Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, N., Miller, D., and Moss, N. (2001). The Role of Individual Differences in Internet Searching: An Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(12), 1049–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen, K. (2003a). Students’ Conceptions of Information Retrieval: Implications for the Design of Learning Environments. Library and Information Science Research, 25(3), 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen, K. (2003b). Scaffolding Performance in IR Instruction: Exploring Learning Experiences and Performance in Two Learning Environments. Journal of Information Science, 29(5), 375–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen, K. (2004). Two Information Retrieval Learning Environments: Their Design and Evaluation. Tampere University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen, K. and Jarvelin, K. (2004). Assessing Learning Outcomes in Two Information Retrieval Learning Environments. Information Processing and Management, 41(4), 949–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halttunen, K. and Sormunen, E. (2000). Learning Information Retrieval Through an Educational Game. Education for Information, 18(4), 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, C. and Strube, G. (2000). Web Search Behavior of Internet Experts and Newbies. The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking, 33(1–6), 337–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information Retrieval Interaction. London: Taylor Graham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. (1996). Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory. Journal of Documentation, 52(1), 3–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. and Willet, P. (1995). An Introduction to Algorithmic and Cognitive Approaches for Information Retrieval. Libri, 45, 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J. (2000). The Effect of Query Complexity on Web Searching Results. Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 6(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J. and Pooch, U. W. (2001). A Review of Web Searching Studies and a Framework for Future Research. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 52(3), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B., J. Spink, A., and Saracevic, T. (2000). Real Life, Real Users, and Real Needs: A Study and Analysis of User Queries on the Web. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.D. and Marakas, G. M. (2000). The Role of Behavioral Modeling in Computer Skills Acquisition: Toward Refinement of the Model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-S. and Allen, B. (2002). Cognitive and Task Influences on Web Searching Behavior. Journal of the J American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraiger, K. J. Ford, K. and Salas, E. (1993). Application of Cognitive, Skill-Based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazonder, A. W. (2000). Exploring Novice Users’ Training Needs in Searching Information on the WWW. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16(4), 326–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, W. and Topi, H. (2002). Form and Function: The Impact of Query Term and Operator Usage on Web Search Results. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 95–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, W. and Topi, H. (2004). Training for Web Search: Will It Get You in Shape? Journal of the American J Society for Information Science and Technology, 41(2), 383–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchionini, G. (1992). Interfaces for End-User Information Seeking. Journal of the American Society for J Information Science, 43(2), 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pharo, N. (2002). The Search Situation and Transition Method Schema: A Tool for Analyzing Web Information Search Processes. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shneiderman, B., Byrd, D., and Croft, W. B. (1997, January 1997). Clarifying Search: A User-Interface Framework for Text Searches. Retrieved January, 2000, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january97/retrieval/01shneiderman.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, J., and Moricz, M. (1999). Analysis of a Very Large Web Search Engine Query Log. SIGIR Forum, 33(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sormunen, E. and Pennanen, S. (2004). The Challenge of Automated Tutoring in Web-Based Learning Environments for Information Retrieval Instruction. Information Research—An International Electronic Journal, 9(2), paper 169 [Available at: http://InformationR.net/ir/9-2/paper169.html].

    Google Scholar 

  • Spink, A. and Saracevic, T. (1997). Interactive Information Retrieval: Sources and Effectiveness of Search Terms During Mediated Online Searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(8), 741–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, B. J., and Saracevic, T. (2001). Searching the Web: The Public and Their Queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53(2), 226–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, A., G. Ennis, M., and Watkinson, S. J. (2000). Empirical Studies of End-user Information Searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(13), 1211–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Te’eni, D. and Feldman, R. (2001). Performance and Satisfaction in Adaptive Websites: An Experiment on T Searches Within a Task-Adapted Website. Journal of AIS J, 2(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Topi, H. and Lucas, W. (2005). Searching the Web: Operator Assistance Required. Information Processing and Management, 41(2), 383–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turtle, H. (1994). Natural Language vs. Boolean Query Evaluation: A Comparison of Retrieval Performance. In Proceedings of SIGIR 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, M. I. and Davis, F. D. (2001). Improving Computer Training Effectiveness for Decision Technologies: Behavior Modeling and Retention Enhancement. Decision Sciences, 32(3), 521–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, M. I. and Davis, F. D. (2003). Developing and Validating an Observational Learning Model of Computer Software Training and Skill Acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lucas, W., Topi, H. (2005). Learning and Training to Search. In: Spink, A., Cole, C. (eds) New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval. The Information Retrieval Series, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4014-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4014-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-4013-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-4014-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics