The Good Inequality: Supporting Group-Work in Shared Virtual Environments

  • Maria Spante
  • Ann-Sofie Axelsson
  • Ralph Schroeder
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW, volume 34)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Axelsson, A.S. (2004). Framing Social Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments: The Influence of Technical and Social Factors. Doctoral Dissertation. Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attributional processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13: 279–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Axelsson, A.S. (2002). The digital divide—Status differences in virtual environments. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments, London: Springer, pp. 188–204.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hinds, P. & Kiesler, S. (Eds.) (2002). Distributed Work. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Churchill, E., Snowdon, D., & Munro, A. (Eds.) (2001). Collaborative Virtual Environments: Digital Spaces and Places for Interaction. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiMaggio, P., Hargiatti, E., Neuman, R., & Robinson, J.P. (2001). Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology, (27): 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. (Eds.) (2002). The Internet in Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sonnenwald, D.H., Solomon, P., Hara, N., Bollinger, R., & Cox, T. (2002). Collaboration in the large: Using video conferencing to facilitate large group interaction. In A. Gunasekaran & O. Khalil (Eds.), Knowledge and Information Technology in 21stCentury Organizations: Humans and Social Perspectives. Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing Co, pp. 155–136.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Axelsson, A.S., Abelin, Å., Heldal, I., Nilsson, A., Schroeder, R., & Wideström, J. (2001). Cubes in the cube: A comparison of a puzzle-solving task in a virtual and real environment. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 4(2): 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scheumie, M.J., van der Straaten, P., Krijn, M, & van der Mast, C. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 4(2): 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schroeder, R. (Ed.) (2002). The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. London: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., & Burgoon, J.K. (2003). Towards a more robust theory and measure of social presence: Review and suggested criteria. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(5): 456–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Small group behaviour in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9(1): 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schroeder, R., Steed, A., Axelsson, A.S., Heldal, I., Abelin, Å., Wideström, J., Nilsson, A., & Slater, M. (2001). Collaborating in networked immersive spaces: As good as being there together? Computers & Graphics, 25(5): 781–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hindmarsh, J., Fraser, M., Heath, C., & Benford, S. (1998). Fragmented interaction: Establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments. Proceedings of CSCW’98, pp. 217–226.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heldal, I., Steed, A., Spante, M., Schroeder, R., Bengtsson, S., & Partanen, M. (in press). Successes and failures in co-present situations. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Altheide, D. (1996). Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kraut, R., Fussell, S., Brennan, S., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects on proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaboration. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 137–162.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nardi, B. & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.) Distributed Work. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 83–110.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Axelsson, A.S., Abelin, Å., & Schroeder, R. (2003). Communication in virtual environments: Establishing common ground for a collaborative spatial task. The 6th International Workshop on Presence. Aalborg, Denmark, October 6–8.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spante, M. (2004). Shared Virtual Environments: Technology, Social Interaction, Adaptation and Time. Licentiate Thesis. Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Albrecht, M.H. (2001). Managing Diversity in theWorkplace. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mark, G. (2002). Conventions for coordinating electronic distributed work: A longitudinal study of groupware use. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 259–282.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nilsson, A., Heldal, I., Schroeder, R., & Axelsson, A.S. (2002). The long-termuses of shared virtual environments. An exploratory study. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. London: Springer, pp. 112–126.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Walther, J.B. (2002). Time effects in computer-mediated groups: Past, present, and future. In P. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work. Cambridge Massachusetts: The MIT Press, pp. 235–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Spante
    • 1
  • Ann-Sofie Axelsson
    • 1
  • Ralph Schroeder
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Technology Management and EconomicsChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden
  2. 2.Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations