Ferguson’s “Invisible Hand”

The Theory of Spontaneous Order
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas / Archives internationales d’histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 191)


Private Property Invisible Hand Formal Government Human Design Spontaneous Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 623.
    By which is meant Cartesian rationalism. F.A. Hayek makes the following distinction between a post-and pre-Cartesian conception of reason: ‘To the medieval thinkers reason had meant mainly a capacity to recognise truth, especially moral truth, when they met it, rather than a capacity of deductive reasoning from explicit premises’. F.A. Hayek, ‘Kinds of Rationalism’, Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1967, p 84.Google Scholar
  2. 624.
    According to Duncan Forbes, John Bernstein and Ian Ross, Ferguson was unlikely to have been influenced by the work of Vico. Duncan Forbes, ‘Scientific Whiggism: Adam Smith and John Millar’ Cambridge Journal, Vol.VI, 1954, pp.643–70, p. 658; Bernstein, ‘Adam Ferguson and the Idea of Progress’, p. 104; I. Ross, Foreword to R. Hamowy, The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order, Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1987, p.ix.Google Scholar
  3. 625.
    Barry, ‘The Tradition of Spontaneous Order’, pp. 12–14 and Lee Cronk,’ spontaneous Order Analysis and Anthropology’, Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 1 (3), 1988, pp. 282–308, p. 283.Google Scholar
  4. 626.
    Ian Ross, ‘Forward’ to Hamowy, Spontaneous Order, p. ix and passim. For more sources on the topic of spontaneous order see Bibliography, Section 5.Google Scholar
  5. 627.
    See, Cronk, ‘Spontaneous Order Analysis’, p. 284 and Hayek, ‘The Results of Human Actions’, P. 97.Google Scholar
  6. 628.
    Lehmann, Adam Ferguson, p. 93.Google Scholar
  7. 629.
    Hamowy, Spontaneous Order, pp. 3–4; Cronk’s and Hayek’s definitions of spontaneous order hinge on the detection of ‘regularities and predictabilities’ in social processes. Cronk,’ spontaneous Order’, p. 282; Hayek, ‘Rules and Order’, p. 11. Richard Vernon canvasses the different senses in which ‘unintended consequences’ has been used by a variety of thinkers in his article: ‘Unintended Consequences’, Political Theory, Vol. 7 (1), February, 1979, pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
  8. 630.
    Michael Polanyi, The Logic of Liberty: Reflections and Rejoinders, London: Kegan Paul, 1951, p. 112. See also A. Bognor, ‘The Structure of Social Processes: A Commentary on the Sociology of Elias Norbert’, Sociology, Vol. 20 (3), August, 1986, pp. 387–411, p. 391 and F.A. Hayek, ‘Kinds of Rationalism’, Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, London: Routledge Kegan Paul, 1967.Google Scholar
  9. 631.
    Cited in Hamowy, Spontaneous Order, p. ix.Google Scholar
  10. 632.
    Bognor, “Structure of Social Processes”, p. 391.Google Scholar
  11. 633.
    Forbes ‘Scientific Whiggism’, p. 655.Google Scholar
  12. 634.
    Robert K. Merton, ‘The Unintended Consequences 4 of Purposive Social Action’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 1, 1938, pp. 894–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 635.
    Schneider, The Scottish Moralists, p. xxxi.Google Scholar
  14. 636 R.
    Nozick, ‘The State of Nature’, in Anarchy, State and Utopia, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1974, pp. 18–19. The term ‘indirection’ is also associated with spontaneous order type explanations. Hamowy, Spontaneous Order, p. 12.Google Scholar
  15. 637.
    Smith, WN, IV. ii. 9, p. 456. The same phrase is repeated in N The Theory of Moral Sentiments. IV. i. 10. p. 184.Google Scholar
  16. 638.
    Ullmann-Margalit, ‘Invisible-Hand Explanations’, pp. 265–8.Google Scholar
  17. 639.
    Lehmann, ‘Review’, p. 176.Google Scholar
  18. 640.
    As Hayek himself explicitly acknowledged. For a detailed treatment of the influence of the Scottish School in general on Hayek’s theories of spontaneous order, see Christina Petsoulas, Hayek’s Liberalism and its Origins, His Idea of Spontaneous Order and the Scottish Enlightenment. New York: Routledge, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 641.
    Ferguson, Essay, p. 119. My emphasis.Google Scholar
  20. 642.
    Institutes, p. 4.Google Scholar
  21. 643.
    Barry, “The Tradition of Spontaneous Order”, p. 9.Google Scholar
  22. 644.
    Lehmann, Adam Ferguson, p. 250; W. G. Sumner, Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores and Morals, Boston: Ginn, 1906. Though, unlike Sumner, Ferguson was not a moral relativist.Google Scholar
  23. 645.
    Essay, p. 21.Google Scholar
  24. 646.
    Lehmann, ‘Review’, p. 174.Google Scholar
  25. 647.
    John Gray, Liberalisms: Essays in Political Philosophy, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1989, p. 92.’ system-utilitarianism’ is contrasted with the more rationalistic nature of Benthamite actutilitarianism. See also by the same author, Hayek on Liberty, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1985, p. 59.Google Scholar
  26. 648.
    ‘Of Cause and Effect, Ends and Means, Order, Combination and Design’, Collection of Essays, No. 13, p. 120.Google Scholar
  27. 649.
    A phrase coined by Duncan Forbes to describe the manner in which individuals, pursuing private short-term goals, inadvertently secure social order. Forbes, ‘Scientific Whiggism’, p. 655.Google Scholar
  28. 650.
    Institutes, p. 126.Google Scholar
  29. 652.
    Smith, WN, h I. X. c. 59. p. 157; II. ii. 94. p. 324 and II. iv. Ix. 50, p. 687.Google Scholar
  30. 653.
    For a fuller discussion see Mason, ‘Ferguson and Montesquieu’, p. 196; Montesquieu, Laws, 4. 23. 21, pp. 441–51.Google Scholar
  31. 654.
    History, p. 419.Google Scholar
  32. 655.
    P.I., pp. 28. See also, P.I., p. 201.Google Scholar
  33. 656.
    Essay, p. 48.Google Scholar
  34. 657.
    D. N. Robinson, Aristotle’s Psychology, New York: Columbia University Press, 1989, p. 120.Google Scholar
  35. 658.
    Essay, pp. 48–9.Google Scholar
  36. 659.
    Essay, pp. 133–41. See also Institutes, pp. 24–5. Hume arrived at a similar conclusion. Robertson, ‘The Scottish Enlightenment at the Limits of the Civic Tradition’, Hont and Ignatieff,. (eds), pp. 164–5.Google Scholar
  37. 660.
    P.I., pp. 27–9. This notion of society being rooted in the human desire for procreation is found in Stoic thought, specifically in that of Panaetius via Cicero. Cicero, De Officius, with an English translation by Walter Miller, London: Harvard University Press, 1990, I. 12, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar
  38. 661.
    According to Hutcheson, ‘tender parental affection’ is evoked by the ‘lasting imbecility of our younger years’. Francis Hutcheson, A System of Moral Philosophy, in Three Books, 2 Vols., Glasgow and London: R. Foulis et al., 1755, 1. I.i.2, p. 3.Google Scholar
  39. 662.
    Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, 3. 2. 2. p. 486.Google Scholar
  40. 663.
    P.I., p. 28.Google Scholar
  41. 664.
    Cicero, De Finibus, 3. 62, p. 283.Google Scholar
  42. 665.
    P.I., pp. 27–30. Polybius (a key historical source for Ferguson) also located human sociability in human weakness. Polybius, The Rise of the Roman Empire, Translated by Ian Scott-Kilvert, Selected with an Introduction by F.W. Walbank, London: Penguin, 1979, 6.5, pp. 305–6. Cicero argued (similarly. speaking again through Marcus Cato) that the natural affection experienced within the nuclear family develops into a more generalised affection for our fellow human beings, thereby reinforcing our social bonds. Cicero, De Finibus, 3.62–8, pp. 281–9. Notwithstanding the teleological dimension, Ferguson’s observations here anticipate the Attachment Theory of Suttie and Bowlby. Attachment Theory asserts that’ sociality is not merely suggested by child-parent relations but is innate in them, and in that sense the human capacity for social relations is derived from biologically based needs’. Barbalet, Emotion, Social Theory and Social Structure, p. 141.Google Scholar
  43. 666.
    Essay, p. 135. Condorcet came to the same conclusion before Malthus. But other Scottish thinkers, such as Millar and Kames, argued the opposite; that prosperity and luxury worked to reduce population. Forbes,’ scientific Whiggism’, p. 650.Google Scholar
  44. 667.
    Essay, p. 135.Google Scholar
  45. 668.
    Essay, p. 136. See also Institutes, p. 246. Smith made a similar argument in the Wealth of Nations (I. viii. 38–43, pp. 97–9) and Aristotle had arrived at the same conclusion much earlier. L. Robin, Greek Thought and the Origins of the Scientific Spirit, New York: Russell and Russell, 1967, p. 272. Malthus agreed that state interference in population control was unnecessary and would only exacerbate any existing problems. Thomas Malthus, ‘A Summary View of the Principle of Population’, in Three Essays on Population, New York: Mentor Books, 1960, p. 37. Montesquieu, by way of contrast, thought that, in certain cases, state interference in ‘the Propagation of the Species’ was warranted. Laws, 4. 23. 16–28, pp. 437–54.Google Scholar
  46. 669.
    Essay, pp. 131, 139.Google Scholar
  47. 670.
    Essay, pp. 136.Google Scholar
  48. 671.
    For a discussion of Mandeville’s work here see F.B. Kaye, ‘Mandeville on the Origin of Language’, Modern Language Notes, Vol. 39.(1), pp. 136–142.Google Scholar
  49. 672.
    P.I., pp. 43.Google Scholar
  50. 673.
    Essay, p. 76. Grobman, ‘Adam Ferguson’s Influence on Folklore Research: the Analysis of Methodology and the Oral Epic’, Southern Folklore Quarterly, Vol. 38, 1974, pp. 11–22.Google Scholar
  51. 674.
    P.I., p. 47. This argument seems to contradict Ferguson’s other comments about the limited role of cultural diffusion in the progress of nations. See below.Google Scholar
  52. 675.
    P.I., p. 36.Google Scholar
  53. 676.
    Aristotle, Politics: The Athenian Constitution, Edited and with an Introduction by John Warrington, London: Heron Books, 1959, 1. 1. 1253a, p. 7.Google Scholar
  54. 677.
    P.I., pp. 47, 269.Google Scholar
  55. 678.
    P.II., p. 244.Google Scholar
  56. 679.
    Institutes, p. 44; P.I., pp. 40–1.Google Scholar
  57. 680.
    P.I., p. 287. MyGoogle Scholar
  58. 681.
    Essay, pp. 161–3.Google Scholar
  59. 682.
    Institutes, p. 155.Google Scholar
  60. 683.
    Essay, pp. 44–9. See also Institutes, p. 268, P.I., pp. 250, 267–8Google Scholar
  61. 684.
    Smith, WN, I. p. 25.Google Scholar
  62. 685.
    P.I., p. 246.Google Scholar
  63. 686.
    Essay, p. 174.Google Scholar
  64. 687.
    Essay, p. 225.Google Scholar
  65. 688.
    Vernon, ‘Unintended Consequences’, p. 58. Eriksson, ‘The First Formulation of Sociology’, pp. 254–5.Google Scholar
  66. 689.
    Rousseau, ‘Discourse on Inequality’, in Social Contract and Discourses, pp. 58, 54.Google Scholar
  67. 690.
    Essay, p. 21.Google Scholar
  68. 691.
    P.II., p. 244.Google Scholar
  69. 692.
    Rousseau, ‘A Discourse on the Origin of Inequality’, in Social Contract and Discourses, pp. 43–5; Ferguson, Essay, p. 11.Google Scholar
  70. 693.
    ‘Of the terms that we employ in treating of human affairs, those of natural and unnatural are the least determinate in their meaning’ Essay, p.15Google Scholar
  71. 694.
    Essay. p. 84.Google Scholar
  72. 695.
    Essay, pp. 173–4.Google Scholar
  73. 696.
    P.I., p. 256; P.II., pp. 244–5; Essay, p. 120.Google Scholar
  74. 697.
    P.I., p. 256.Google Scholar
  75. 698.
    Essay, pp. 81, 95–8. See also Ferrarotti, ‘Civil Society and State Structures’, p. 14.Google Scholar
  76. 699.
    P.I., p. 262; Institutes, p. 40. See also Zaret, ‘From Political Philosophy to Social Theory’, p. 159.Google Scholar
  77. 700.
    Hume, Treatise, 3. 2. 2. p. 489.Google Scholar
  78. 701.
    Institutes, pp. 22–4.Google Scholar
  79. 702.
    P.II., pp. 496, 244; P.I., p. 256 and Remarks, p. 3.Google Scholar
  80. 703.
    Robinson, Aristotle’s Psychology, p. 120.Google Scholar
  81. 704.
    Indeed, Ferguson frequently links the idea of defects with the design principle. See, for example, P.I., p. 177 and Chapter 11 of this volume.Google Scholar
  82. 705.
    Institutes, p. 274; P.II., pp. 291, 496–7; Remarks, pp. 23–4; Smith, TMS, pp. 231–4.Google Scholar
  83. 706.
    Essay, p. 120.Google Scholar
  84. 707.
    Essay, p. 130.Google Scholar
  85. 708.
    Essay, pp. 118–20, 21–3.Google Scholar
  86. 709.
    P.I., p. 42. Nevertheless Ferguson acknowledges the occasional contribution of the’ singular genius’. P.I., p. 36Google Scholar
  87. 710.
    Even so, Hegel only mentions Ferguson ‘in passing’. Waszek, The Scottish Enlightenment, pp, 21, 103–4 Hegel is also thought to have been influenced by Smith’s ‘invisible hand’ formulation. John B. Davis,’ smith’s Cunning of Reason’, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 16. (6) 1989, pp. 50–68.Google Scholar
  88. 711.
    Essay, p. 119.Google Scholar
  89. 712.
    Institutes, pp. 5, 17.Google Scholar
  90. 713.
    Essay, p. 137; Smith, TMS, II. i. 5. 10. pp. 77–8.Google Scholar
  91. 714.
    Essay, p. 139.Google Scholar
  92. 715.
    P.I., p. 4.Google Scholar
  93. 716.
    P.I., p. 244.Google Scholar
  94. 717.
    See also Essay, p. 139.Google Scholar
  95. 718.
    ‘Men are charged only with the care of...doing what is right...Events are reserved to God’. Ferguson, Analysis, p. 27Google Scholar
  96. 719.
    For a fuller discussion on the influence of Calvinist anti-rationalism and unintentionality see David Allan, Virtue, Learning and the Scottish Enlightenment, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993, pp. 212–15.Google Scholar
  97. 720.
    See Hume, Treatise, 3. 2. 2. p. 493; Millar, The Distinction of Ranks, pp. 238, 255, 278; Adam Smith, Lectures on Jurisprudence, R.L. Meek, D.D. Raphael and L.G. Stein (eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1978 (hereafter cited as LJ), B, p. 406.Google Scholar
  98. 721.
    Hamowy, ‘Progress and Commerce’, p. 77.Google Scholar
  99. 722.
    P.I., pp. 174–8, 165. See also Whitney, Primitivism and the Idea of Progress, p. 145.Google Scholar
  100. 723.
    Whitney, Primitivism and the Idea of Progress, pp. 151–2. There were inklings of evolutionism already emerging in scientific treatises of the time. For example, Maupertuis’s Essai de Cosmologie (1741) alludes to the idea of’ survival of the fittest’.Google Scholar
  101. 724.
    P.I., p. 174.Google Scholar
  102. 725.
    P.I., pp. 167–8.Google Scholar
  103. 726.
    P.I., pp. 48, 61; P.II., p. 410; Essay, pp. 11–2, 16.Google Scholar
  104. 727.
    Essay, ‘Variants’, p. 265.Google Scholar
  105. 728.
    Hayek, Rules and Order, p. 23.Google Scholar
  106. 729.
    P.I., p. 190.Google Scholar
  107. 730.
    Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, 4. 36. p. 72.Google Scholar
  108. 731.
    P.I., pp. 313, 174; P.I., pp. 190–1Google Scholar
  109. 732.
    P.I., p. 190.Google Scholar
  110. 733.
    Whitney, Primitivism and the Idea of Progress, p. 151; P.I., p. 175.Google Scholar
  111. 734.
    ‘Of the Separation of Departments’, Collection of Essays, No. 15, p. 150.Google Scholar
  112. 735.
    P.I., p. 53.Google Scholar
  113. 736.
    Essay, pp. 119, 163.Google Scholar
  114. 737.
    P.I., p. 43.Google Scholar
  115. 738.
    Whitney, Primitivism and the Idea of Progress, p. 153; Essay, pp. 12–13.Google Scholar
  116. 739.
    P.II., p. 498.Google Scholar
  117. 740.
    John Bernstein describes Ferguson’s as a ‘Providential teleology’ though he limits this observation to the Principles. ‘Adam Ferguson and the Idea of Progress’, p. 113Google Scholar
  118. 741.
    See, for example, Essay, pp. 74, 96–7, 183.Google Scholar
  119. 742.
    Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, 4.40, p. 73.Google Scholar
  120. 743.
    Essay, p. 264.Google Scholar
  121. 744.
    P.I., pp. 28, 329–30; P.II., p. 403.Google Scholar
  122. 745.
    P.I., pp. 312–3.Google Scholar
  123. 746.
    G. E. M. Joad, ‘The Problem of Change: Teleology and Mechanism’, Guide to Philosophy, London: Victor Gollancz, 1937, pp. 202–3.Google Scholar
  124. 747.
    P.I., pp. 184–5; Joad, ‘The Problem of Change’, p. 203.Google Scholar
  125. 748.
    ‘Of Cause and Effect’, Collection of Essays, No. 13, p. 121.Google Scholar
  126. 749.
    P.I., pp. 184–5.Google Scholar
  127. 750.
    Essay, pp. 10–14.Google Scholar
  128. 751.
    ‘The author is invisible but his operation is manifest’. ‘Of Things that are or May Be’, Collection of Essays, No. 27(1) p. 224Google Scholar
  129. 752.
    It has been suggested that Ferguson’s history contains ‘no tincture of the perfectibility thesis found in Comte or Godwin’. A. S. Skinner, ‘Adam Ferguson: The History of Civil Society’, Political Studies, Vol. 15, 1967, pp. 219–21, p. 220 For opponents of this reading (other than myself) see: John Veitch, ‘Philosophy in the Scottish Universities’, Mind, Vol. 2 (6) April, 1877, p. 217; Kettler, Social and Political Thought of Adam Ferguson, p. 122; Bernstein, ‘Ferguson and the Idea of Progress’, passim, and Pierce, ‘The Scottish Common Sense School’, pp. 142–3.Google Scholar
  130. 753.
    P.I. p. 47; Essay, pp. 204–5.Google Scholar
  131. 754.
    Essay, p. 13.Google Scholar
  132. 755.
    P.I., p. 184; See also P.I., p. 190.Google Scholar
  133. 756.
    Marcus Aurelius, Meditations, 4. 36. p. 72.Google Scholar
  134. 757.
    Robert Nisbet, History of the Idea of Progress, London: Heinemann, 1980, p. 45. Seneca’s analogy was to be used by various thinkers, from St Augustine to Comte, for the next nineteen hundred years.Google Scholar
  135. 758.
    Essay, pp. 10–11; P.I., pp. 36, 194; ‘Of Cause and Effect, Ends and Means, Order, Combination and Design’, Collection of Essays, No. 13, p. 123.Google Scholar
  136. 759.
    In particular, we exercise considerable latitude in terms of the content and rate of progress. P.I., p. 314; P.II., pp. 54–5Google Scholar
  137. 760.
    P.I., p. 202.Google Scholar
  138. 761.
    Michael Lane, Structuralism, London: Jonathan Cape, 1970, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  139. 762.
    Namely our moral self-realisation, expressed in the service of the community and in mutual beneficence. P.II., pp. 28–9Google Scholar
  140. 763.
    Jean Willke also offers an interpretation of Ferguson’s history similar to that presented here. Willke, Historical Thought of Adam Ferguson, passimGoogle Scholar
  141. 764.
    I have borrowed the term ‘progressive teleology ‘from David Kettler. Kettler, Social and Political Thought of Adam Ferguson, p. 130Google Scholar
  142. 765.
    Institutes, p. 90.Google Scholar
  143. 766.
    P.II., p. 403.Google Scholar
  144. 767.
    Joad, Philosophy, pp. 202–3.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Personalised recommendations