Skip to main content

Abstract

In the present study, ballistic resistance of sandwich composite structures for vehicle armor panel applications was investigated. The core material of the sandwich structure was a layer of Alumina ceramic and a layer of composite backing, sandwiched between 2D plain weave composite skins. The ballistic performance of sandwich materials with 3D backing was compared to the baseline 2D plain weave backed composites. An IMACON 200 high-speed camera was used to obtain high-speed photographs of the ballistic events of penetration and damage. These images were analyzed to study real time damage mechanism of the strike face surface of several targets and subsequently to obtain average resistive force of target points during impact. Velocities of projectile (armor piercing bullets) were recorded in all the experiments and were found to be in the range of 915 – 975 m/s. Post mortem analyses, which included sectioning of panel, were performed. Results showed that armor panels with 3D woven backing had a higher ballistic efficiency than the 2D baseline panels, strike face damage mechanics were predominantly axi-symmetric about the impact point and panels with 3D backing had controlled delamination and fewer complete penetrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bless, S.J. and Hartman, D.R., “Ballistic Penetration of S-2 Glass Laminates,” Proc. 21st Int. SAMPE Technical Conference, September 1989, p. 825.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bogdanovich, A., Coffelt, R.A. et al., “Innovative Materials for Lightweight Armor,” Contract No. DAAD17-01-C-0086, U.S. Army Report, September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Viechnicki, D.J., Anctil, A.A., Papetti, D.J. and Prifti, J.J., “Lightweight Armor — A Status Report,” MTL-TR-89-8, January 1989; DTIC Doc AD-D150 327.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bogdanovich, A., Coffelt, R.A., et al., “3-D Orthogonal Woven Composites in Armor Systems,” C-DAAD 19-02-C-0044, U.S. Army STTR Phase II Report, June 2002-June 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czarnecki, G.J., “Estimation of the V50 Using Semi-Empirical (1-point) Procedures,” Composites Part B Engineering, Vol. 29B (1997), pp. 321–329.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shukla, A., Grogan, J., Tekalur, S.A., Bogdanovich, A., Coffelt, R.A. (2005). Ballistic Resistance of 2D & 3D Woven Sandwich Composites. In: Thomsen, O., Bozhevolnaya, E., Lyckegaard, A. (eds) Sandwich Structures 7: Advancing with Sandwich Structures and Materials. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3848-8_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3444-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3848-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics