Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Evolutionary Approach to the Constitutionalism of an Enlarged EU: Why will Cognitive and Cultural Boundaries Matter?

  • Chapter
Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?

  • 1215 Accesses

5. Conclusion

I have tried to show how the constitutional discourses of new Member States will have an impact on EU constitutionalism. The chapter has discussed why an evolutionary approach is better equipped to understand the rationale of the constitutional discourse of the enlarged EU. Taking this approach, scholars and policy makers should pay attention to the value attributed, through the interpretation and the use of norms and principles, to the different normative sources they have within a European legal order. Therefore, I have introduced the idea that the meaning of constitutionalism in an enlarged Union can be understood only in accounting for the impact that the normative frameworks of new Member States will have in the EU on the whole. This is the reason why the normative value—namely the legitimacy and the normative meaning actually reached in social situations—of the European constitutional principles will be discovered step by step, as the constitutional discourse of the enlarged EU will be faced with new types of problems and situations. Along this path, constitutional principles and values will be assessed against their contextual pertinence in solving social conflicts and against the legitimacy they have for citizens as well.

In this view, the differentiation and the pluralism coming from the new Member States could present an opportunity rather than a challenge to the constitutionalization of the EU. This joins, in some sense, the position taken by Montesquieu when talking about norms. If every society has its own norms that make social coordination possible, then the legal order that might be introduced into a society will make sense only matching the conditions and the boundaries that people draw from norms and principles—even implicitly—shared.

I am very grateful to W. Sadurski for his remarks on a draft version of the chapter. The seminars in legal and political theory, organized in Paris in 2002, and directed by Jon Elster, have been very enlightening about the processes of institutional building.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Charles de Secondat Montesquieu, De l’esprit des lois (1748) (Paris: Flammarion, 1979), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For an overall analysis of the impact of the various normative sources on domestic systems see Rein Mullerson et al (eds.), Constitutional Reform and International Law in Central and Eastern Europe (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1998) and, for a more specific view on enlargement, Alfred Kellerman et al (eds.), EU Enlargement. The Constitutional Impact at the EU and at the National Level (The Hague: Asser Institute, TMC, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedrich von Hayek, Law, Legislation and Liberty (London: Routledge, 1982), Chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kenneth George Binmore, Game Theory and Social Contract (Cambridge: MIT, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. James Colomer, Political Institutions and Social Choice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geoffrey Brennan and James Buchanan, The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a critical assessment of the contractualist theories, see Christopher Morris, The Social Contract Theories: Critical Essays on Hobbes, Locke and Rousseau (Lanham: Rowman Littlefield, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See for a criticism of this view Russell Hardin, “Why a Constitution?”, in Bernard Grofman and Donald Wittman, eds., The Federalist Papers and the New Institutionalism (New York: Agathon Press, 1989), pp. 100–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Brennan and Buchanan, op. cit. n. 7, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruno De Witte, “The closest thing to a constitutional conversation in Europe. The semipermanent treaty revision process”, in Paul Beaumont, Carole Lyons and Neil Walker (eds.), Convergence and Divergence in European Public Law (Oxford: Hart, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lykke Friis, “Conceptualising Enlargement”, paper prepared for the workshop “Governance by Enlargement”, Darmstadt, 23–25 June 2000, and Anna Murphy, “The European Union and Central and Eastern Europe: Governance and Boundaries”, Journal of Common Market Studies (37) (1999), pp. 211–232.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Elena Iankova, “Governed by Accession. Hard and Soft Pillars of Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe”, East European Studies, Occasional papers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Friedrich von Hayek, Scientism and the Study of Society (1942–1944), in The Counter-Revolution of Science. Studies on the Abuse of Reason (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1952), pp. 13–102 and 207–221.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Friedrich von Hayek, “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, American Economic Review (35) (1945), pp. 519–530.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Viktor Vanberg, “Institutional Competition Among Jurisdictions: An Evolutionary Approach”, Constitutional Political Economy (5) (1994), pp. 193–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Robert Alexy, A Theory of Legal Argumentation: the Theory of Rational Discourse as a Theory of Legal Justification (Oxford: Clarendon, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Donald Davidson, Subjective, Intersubjective and Objective (Oxford: Clarendon, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedrich Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Geoffrey Pridham et al (eds.), Building Democracy? The International Dimension of Democratisation of the Eastern Europe (London: Leicester University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Andrew Janos, “Continuity and Change in Eastern Europe: Strategies for Post Communist Politics”, East European Politics and Society (8) (1994), pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Detleft Pollack, Political Culture in Post Communist Europe (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carlo Gialdino, “Some Reflections on the acquis communautaire”, Common Market Law Review, 32 (1990), 5, pp. 1089–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Adam Fagin, “Democratisation in Eastern Europe: The Limitations of the Existing Transition Literature”, Contemporary Politics (4) (1998), 143–159.

    Google Scholar 

  25. James Gregor, “Constitutional Factors in Politics in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe”, Communist and Post Communist Studies (29) (1998), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Milada Anna Vachudova, “Are Transitions Transitory? Two Types of Political Change in Eastern Europe since 1989”, East European Politics and Societies (11) (1997), pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lykke Friis, op. cit. n. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  28. European Commission, Explaining enlargement, http://European.Eu.int/comm/enlargement, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See Grzegorz Ekiert and Jan Zielonka, “Introduction: Academic boundaries and Path Dependencies Facing the EU’s Eastward Enlargement”, East European Politics and Society (17) (2003), pp. 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lykke Friis, “The End of the Beginning of Eastern Enlargement—Luxembourg Summit and Agenda Setting”, European Integration Online Paper (27) (1998), http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1998-007a.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Antje Wiener, “Finality vs. Enlargement. Constitutive Practices and Opposing Rationales in the Reconstruction of Europe”, Jean Monnet Working Papers (8) (2002), http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers /02/020801.html.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grzegorz Ekiert and Ian Zielonka, op. cit. n. 29, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. The choice of this unity of analysis implies a specific methodological perspective, namely relying upon discourse analysis. See Michel Stubbs, Discourse Analysis (Chicago: Chicago University Press 1983). See also Daniela Piana, “Constructing the European Constitutional Discourse? Arguments for Common Values in the European Convention”, South European Society and Politics, 9 (2004) 24.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Daniela Piana, Rappresentazione cognitiva delle norme sociali ed effetto framing, in Rosaria Egidi e Massimo dell’Utri (eds.), Normatività, fatti e valori (Macerata: Quodlibet, 2003), pp. 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Michael Bratman, “Cognitivism about Practical Reason”, Ethics (102) (1991), pp. 117–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. James March and James Olsen, Ambiguity and Choice in Organisations (Bergen: Universitätforlagt, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Here again the intuition of Friedrich von Hayek, op. cit. n. 3, p. 52, is perfectly pertinent.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Jon Elster, “Coming to Terms with the Past. A framework for the Study of Justice in the Transition to Democracy”, Archives Européennes de Sociologie (39) (1998), pp. 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Peter Häberle, “Constitutional developments in Eastern Europe”, Cahiers de Philosophie Politique et Juridique, 24 (1993), pp. 127–157 and Wolf Heydebrand, “The Dynamics of Legal Change in Eastern Europe”, Studies in Law, Politics and Society (15) (1995), pp. 263–313.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Actions (New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kathleen Dowley, “Social Capital, Ethnicity and Support for Democracy in the Post Communist States”, Europe Asia Studies (54) (2002), pp. 505–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Raymond Boudon, “The Cognitivistic Model. A Generalized ‘Rational-Choice’ Model”, Rationality and Society (8) (1996), pp. 123–150.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Jon Elster, The Cement of Society: a Study of Social Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Raymond Boudon, “Local versus General Ideologies: A Normal Ingredient of Political Life”, Journal of Political Ideology (4) (1999), pp. 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Karen Henderson, Back to Europe: Central and Eastern Europe and the European Union (London: UCL 1999). See also Anneli Albi, “Postmodern Versus Retrospective Sovereignty: Two Different Discourses in the EU and in the Candidate Countries”, in Neil Walker (ed.), Sovereignty in Transition (Oxford: Hart, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Christophe Bertossi, Les Frontières de la Citoyennété en Europe: Nationalité, Residence, Appartenance (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dejan Popovic, Les Ambiguités de la Conception Postcommuniste de l’Etat-nation. Fondements Constitutionnels de l’Etat-nation, in Slobodan Milacic (ed.), La Réinvention de l’Etat (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 2003), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lorent Licata et al, “Driving European Identification through Discourse: Do Nationals Feel more European when Told they are all Similar?”, Psychologica Belgica (43) (2003), pp. 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Albert Bandura, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Daniele Archibugi and David Held, Cosmopolitan Democracy: An Agenda for a New World Order (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995). See also Robert Cooper, The Post-Modern State and the World Order (London: Demos, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Clifford Geertz, “The Integrative Revolution: Primordial Sentiments and Civil Politics in the New States”, in Clifford Geertz (ed.), Old Societies and New States (London: Free Press, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  52. About the search of a constitutional justice in the CEECs see Herman Schwartz, The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Stephane Pierré-Caps, L’Etat Postcommuniste entre Identité Nationale et Intégration Supranationale, in Slobodan Milacic (ed.), ibid. op. cit. n. 47, pp. 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Carlo Gialdino, op. cit. n. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Jon Elster (ed.), The Roundtable Talks and the Breakdown of Communism (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  56. For a theoretical view Jon Elster, Ulysses Unbound (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jon Elster, “Rebuilding the Boat at the Open Sea: Constitution Making in Eastern Europe”, Public Administration (71) (1993), pp. 169–217.

    Google Scholar 

  58. John Dryzek and Leslie Holmes (eds.), Post Communist Democratisation: Political Discourse Across Thirteen Countries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Aaron Wildavsky, Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and the Craft of Policy Analysis (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Slobodan Milacic, Les Ambuiguïtés du Constitutionnalisme Postcommuniste, in Jean-Claude Colliard and Yves Jegouzo (eds.), Le Noveau Constitutionnalisme. Mèlanges en l’honneur de Géranrd Conac (Paris: Economica, 2001), pp. 339–356.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lorent Licata, “Representing the future of the European Union: consequences on national and European identification”, Papers on social representations (5) (2003), http://www.psr.jku.at/psrindex.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  62. William Mishler and Richard Rose, “Trajectories of Fear and Hope: Support for Democracy in Post Communist Europe”, Comparative political studies (28) (1996), pp. 553–581.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wojciech Sadurski, “Constitutionalization of the EU and the Sovereignty Concerns of the New Accession States: The Role of the Charter of Rights”, EUI Working Paper, LAW 2003/11 (Florence: European University Institute, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mary Kaldor and Ivan Vejvoda, Democratization in Central and Eastern Europe (London: Pinter, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Slobodan Milacic, La Démocratie Constitutionnelle en Europe Centrale et Orientale. Bilans et Perspectives (Bruxelles: Bruylant, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Stephen Whitefield and Geoffrey Evans, “Attitudes towards the East, Democracy and the Market”, in Jan Zielonka and Alex Pravda (eds.), Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe, Vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 231–253.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Andrew Michta, “Democratic Consolidation in Poland after 1989”, in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott, The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe, Vol. 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies (RSCAS), European University Institute, Florence

    Daniela Piana (Jean Monnet Fellow)

Authors
  1. Daniela Piana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. European University Institute, Florence, Italy

    Wojciech Sadurski

  2. University of NSW, Sydney, Australia

    Adam Czarnota  & Martin Krygier  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piana, D. (2006). An Evolutionary Approach to the Constitutionalism of an Enlarged EU: Why will Cognitive and Cultural Boundaries Matter?. In: Sadurski, W., Czarnota, A., Krygier, M. (eds) Spreading Democracy and the Rule of Law?. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3842-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation