Abstract
Ecologists study the rules that govern processes influencing the distribution and abundance of organisms, particularly with respect to the interactions of organisms with their biotic and abiotic environments. Over the past decades, using a combination of sophisticated mathematical models and rigorous experiments, ecologists have made considerable progress in understanding the complex web of interactions that constitute an ecosystem. The field of genomics runs on a path parallel to ecology. Like ecology, genomicists seek to understand how each gene in the genome interacts with every other gene and how each gene interacts with multiple, environmental factors. Gene networks connect genes as complex as the ‘webs’ that connect the species in an ecosystem. In fact, genes exist in an ecosystem we call the genome. The genome as ecosystem is more than a metaphor — it serves as the conceptual foundation for an interdisciplinary approach to the study of complex systems characteristic of both genomics and ecology. Through the infusion of genomics into ecology and ecology into genomics both fields will gain fresh insight into the outstanding major questions of their disciplines.
Key words
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barkai, N. & S. Leibler, 1997. Robustness in simple biochemical networks. Nature 387: 913–917.
Bergman, A. & M.L. Siegal, 2003. Evolutionary capacitance as a general feature of complex gene networks. Nature 424: 549–552.
Cochran, W.G. & G.M. Cox, 1992. Experimental Designs. Wiley & Sons, New York, 611 pp.
Cushing, J.M.R. Costantino, B. Dennis, R. Desharnais, & S. Henson (eds.), 2002. Chaos in Ecology: Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics. Academic Press, New York. 225 pp.
Dieckmann, U., R. Law & J.A.J. Metz (eds.), 2000. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions: Simplifying Spatial Complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 580 pp.
Gilliland, L.U., E.C. McKinney, M.A. Asmussen & R.B. Meagher, 1998. Detection of deleterious genotypes in multigenerational studies. I. disruptions in individual Arabidopsis actin genes. Genetics 149: 717–725.
Hairston, N.G., Sr., 1989. Ecological Experiments: Purpose, Design and Execution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 384 pp.
Hood, L. & D. Galas, 2003. The digital code of DNA. Nature 421: 444–448.
Ideker, T., T. Galitski & L. Hood, 2001. A new approach to decoding life: Systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2: 343–372.
Jackson, R.B., C.R. Linder, M. Lynch, M. Purugganan, S. Somerville & S.S. Thayer, 2002. Linking molecular insight and ecological research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 409–414.
Jankielsohn, A., C.H. Scholtz & S.V. Louw. 2000. Effect of habitat transformation on dung beetle assemblages: a comparison between a South African nature reserve and neighboring farms. Environ. Entomol. 30: 474–483.
Kitano, H., 2002. Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295: 1662–1664.
May, R.M., 1976. Theoretical Ecology: Principles and Applications. W. B. Saunders, New York. 317 pp.
May, R.M., 2001. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey. 292 pp.
Meagher, S., D.J. Penn & W.K. Potts, 2000. Male-male competition magnifies inbreeding depression in wild house mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 3324–3329.
Morin, P.J., 1999. Community Ecology. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA. 424 pp.
O’Connor, R.J., 2000. Why ecology lags behind biology. The Scientist 14(20): 35.
Odum, H.T., 1983. Systems Ecology: An Introduction. Wiley and Sons, New York, 644 pp.
Okubo, A. & S.A. Levin (eds.), 2001. Diffusion and Ecological Problems. Springer Verlag. New York. 488 pp.
Patten, B.C. & S.E. Jørgensen (eds.), 1995. Complex Ecology. The Part-Whole Relation in Ecosystems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. 705 pp.
Resetarits, W.J. & J. Bernardo (eds.), 1998. Experimental Ecology: Issues and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York. 488 pp.
Scheiner, S.M. & J. Gurevitch (eds.), 2001. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments. Oxford University Press, New York. 415 pp.
Tautz, D., 2000. A genetic uncertainty problem. Trends Genet. 16: 475–477.
Tilstone, C., 2003. Vital statistics. Nature 424: 610–612.
Tong, A. H. Y. et al., 2004. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303: 808–813.
Waddington, C.H., 1942. The epigenotype. Endeavour 1: 18–20.
Wilbur, H.M., 1987. Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology 68: 1437–1452.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mauricio, R. (2005). Can ecology help genomics: the genome as ecosystem?. In: Mauricio, R. (eds) Genetics of Adaptation. Georgia Genetics Review III, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3836-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3836-4_19
Received:
Accepted:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3476-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3836-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)