Keeping the Conversational Score: Constraints for an Optimal Contextualist Answer?
Conversational contextualism states that the truth-conditions expressed by knowledge-attributing sentences vary relative to the context of utterance. This context is determined partly by different standards the person involved must meet in order to make the sentence true. I am concerned with the question of how these standards can be raised or lowered, and especially what happens to the standards and the conversational score when parties in a discussion push the conversational scores in different directions. None of the available options for an answer seems satisfying. I argue that this results from a misunderstanding of the characteristics of the situation at hand.
KeywordsKnowledge Ascription Veto Power Personal Standard Epistemic Standard Conversational Contextualism
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bach, K.: forthcoming, ‘The Emperor’s New ‘Knows’’, in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: On Epistemology, Language and Truth, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Cited from: userwww.sfsu.edu/rkbach/contextualism.pdf.Google Scholar
- Brendel, E.: 2003, ‘Was Kontextualisten nicht wissen’, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 51, 1015–1032.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S.: 1999, ‘Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons’, Philosophical Perspectives 13, 57–89.Google Scholar
- Cohen, S.: 2000, ‘Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Skepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery’, in E. Sosa and J. Kim (eds.), Epistemology. An Anthology, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 517–530.Google Scholar
- Feldman, R.: 2004, ‘Comments on DeRose’s “Single Scoreboard Semantics”’, Philosophical Studies, 119, 23–33.Google Scholar
- DeRose, K.: 2004, ‘Single Scoreboard Semantics’, Philosophical Studies, 119, 1–21.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Scorekeeping in a Language Game’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–359.Google Scholar
- Lewis, D.: 1996, ‘Elusive Knowledge’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74, 549–567. Reprint 2000 in E. Sosa and J. Kim (eds.), Epistemology. An Anthology, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA, 503–516.Google Scholar
- Nichols, S., S. Stich, and J. Weinberg: 2003, ‘Metaskepticism: Meditations in Ethno-Epistemology’, in S. Luper (ed.), The Skeptics. Contemporary Essays, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, UK, Ashgate Epistemology and Mind Series.Google Scholar
- Stanley, J.: 2004, “On the Linguistic Basis for Contextualism”, Philosophical Studies 119, 119–146.Google Scholar
- Williams, M.: 2000, ‘Is Contextualism Statable?’, Philosophical Issues 10, Skepticism, ed. E. Sosa and E. Villanueva, 80–85.Google Scholar
- Williamson, T.: forthcoming, ‘Knowledge and Scepticism’, in F. Jackson and M. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar