Skip to main content

The Relationship Between Monitoring and Management

  • Chapter
Monitoring Nature Conservation in Cultural Habitats
  • 498 Accesses

10. In Summary

This simple model of change provides us with a logical set of categories for informing basic conservation management decisions. We can base then our monitoring on tests of whether our management aims are met or not. This is much simpler, and potentially more efficient, than other forms of monitoring that try to distinguish trends or use experimental designs.

Elsewhere in this book are many examples of this approach being used across Europe for monitoring both habitats and species. While the details of implementation may differ considerably, the underlying model is always the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

11. References

  • Brown, A. (2000). Habitat Monitoring for Conservation Management and Reporting. 3: Technical Guide. Life-Nature Project no LIFE95 NAT/UK/000821. Integrating monitoring with management planning: a demonstration of good practice in Wales. Countryside Council for Wales, Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, H.Q.P., Baillie, S.R., Balmer, D.E., Bashford, R.I., Beaven, L.P., Dudley, C., Glue, D.E., Gregory, R.D., Marchant, J.H., Peach, W.J. & Wilson, A.M. (1998). Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: their conservation status (1972–1996). BTO Research Report No. 198. BTO, Thetford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellawell, J.M. (1978). Biological Surveillance of Rivers. A Biological Monitoring Handbook. Water Research Centre, Medmenham & Stevenage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Nature Conservation Committee (1998). A Statement on Common Standards Monitoring. Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meffe, G.K., Carroll, C.R. & Contributors (1997). Principles of Conservation Biology, Second Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullin, A.S. & Knight, T.M. (2003). Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. Journal for Nature Conservation 11, 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J.S. (1996). iThe National Vegetation Classification and Monitoring. Report to the Countryside Council for Wales. Unit of Vegetation Science, Lancaster University, Lancaster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell, J.S. (Ed.) (1991). British Plant Communities. Volume I. Woodlands and Scrub. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, T.A. (1993). Common Standards for Monitoring SSSIs. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sit, V. & Taylor B. (Eds) (1998). Statistical Methods for Adaptive Management Studies. Land Management Handbook No 42. Ministry of Forests, British Columbia, Victoria, BC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rowell, T. (2006). The Relationship Between Monitoring and Management. In: Hurford, C., Schneider, M. (eds) Monitoring Nature Conservation in Cultural Habitats. Springer, Dordrecht . https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3757-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics