Advertisement

The Quality of Life in Large American Cities: Objective and Subjective Social Indicators

  • Mark Schneider
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 26)

Abstract

The concept of ‘quality of life’ as a tool of comparative social indicators research is analyzed. Inter-city comparisons of objective and subjective measures of well being are presented and the distinctiveness of these two dimensions of the quality of life is documented. The paper concludes with some observations on the implications that this distinctiveness has for the use of the concept ‘quality of life’ in future social indicators research.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Objective Condition Social Indicator Social Indicator Research Subjective Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Andrews, F. and Withey, S.: 1973, ‘Developing Measures of Perceived Life Quality: Results from Several National Surveys’, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, A.: 1972, ‘Aspiration, Satisfaction and Fulfillment’, in A. Campbell and P. Converse (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change, Russell Sage, New York, pp. 441–466.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, A., Converse, P., and Rodgers, L.: 1972, paper presented at the Conference on Subjective Measures of the Quality of Life, November 14, 15, 1972, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, A. and Converse, P. (eds.): 1972, The Human Meaning of Social Change, Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cazes, B.: 1972, ‘The Development of Social Indicators: A Survey’, in A. Shonfield and S. Shaw (eds.), Social Indicators and Social Policy, Heinemann Educational Books, London, pp. 9–22.Google Scholar
  6. Flax, M.: 1972, A Study in Comparative Urban Indicators: Conditions in 18 Large Metropolitan Areas, Urban Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Gastil, R.: 1970, ‘Social Indicators and Quality of Life’, Public Administration Review, 30, no. 6, pp. 596–601.Google Scholar
  8. Henriot, P.: 1972, Political Aspects of Social Indicators: Implications for Research, Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Rossi, P.: 1972, ‘Community Social Indicators’, in A. Campbell and P. Converse, op. cit., pp. 87–126.Google Scholar
  10. Schuman, H. and Gruenberg, B.: 1970, ‘The Impact of City on Racial Attitudes’, American Journal of Sociology 76, 213–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sheldon, E. and Moore, W. (eds.): 1968, Indicators of Social Change, Russell Sage, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Smith, D.: 1973, The Geography of Social Well Being in the United States: An Introduction to Territorial and Social Indicators, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Springer, M.: 1970, ‘Social Indicators, Reports and Accounts’, The Annals 388, 1–13.Google Scholar
  14. Stagner, R.: 1970, ‘Perceptions, Aspirations, Frustrations and Satisfactions: An Approach to Urban Indicators’, The Annals 388, 59–68.Google Scholar
  15. United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare: 1969, Toward a Social Report, Government Printing Office Washington, D.C.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.SUNYStony Brook

Personalised recommendations