Developing Measures of Perceived Life Quality: Results from Several National Surveys

  • Frank M. Andrews
  • Stephen B. Withey
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 26)


This report presents the current status of a series of studies oriented toward the assessment of perceived life quality. The conceptual model proposes that a person’s overall sense of life quality is understandable as a combination of affective responses to life ‘domains’, which are of two types — role situations and values. Over 100 items used to measure a wide variety of domains and 28 items assessing perceived overall life quality are presented. Various subsets of these items were used in interviews with several representative samples of American adults. Based on these data the domain items were grouped into a smaller number of semi-independent clusters which were internally stable across 10 different subgroups of the respondents and whose interrelationships were highly replicable in independent national samples. A series of analyses, some replicated in more than one survey showed: (1) an additive combination of 12 selected domains explained 50–60 % of the variance in an index of overall life quality, (2) neither other domains nor several social characteristic variables contributed additional explanatory power, (3) this level of explanation was achieved in each of 22 subgroups of the population, and (4) additive combinations of domains worked as well as more complicated combinations.


Life Satisfaction Life Quality Social Indicator Affective Response Additive Combination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aberbach, J. and Walker, J., Race in the City: Political Trust and Public Policy in the New Urban System, Little, Brown, Boston, 1973.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, F. H. and Vernon, P. E., A Study of Values, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, 1931.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, F. M., Morgan, J. N., and Sonquist, J. A., Multiple Classification Analysis, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1967.Google Scholar
  4. Bachman, J. G., Kahn, R. L., Mednick, M. T., Davidson, T. N., and Johnston, L. D., Youth in Transition, Vol. I, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1967.Google Scholar
  5. Blumenthal, M. D., Kahn, R. L., Andrews, F. M., and Head, K. B., Justifying Violence: Attitudes of American Men, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1972.Google Scholar
  6. Bradburn, H. M., The Structure of Psychological Weil-Being, Aldine, Chicago, 1969.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, A., ‘Aspiration, Satisfaction, and Fulfillment’, in A. Campbell and P. Converse (eds.), The Human Meaning of Social Change, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Cantril, H., The Pattern of Human Concerns, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, N. J., 1965.Google Scholar
  9. Dodd, S. C, ‘On Classifying Human Values: A Step in the Prediction of Human Valuing’, American Sociological Review 16 (1951) 645–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurin, G., Veroff, J., and Feld, S., Americans View their Mental Health, Basic Books, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
  11. Guttman, L., ‘A General Non-Metric Technique for Finding the Smallest Euclidean Space for a Configuration of Points’, Psychometrika 33 (1968) 469–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kluckhohn, F. R.,’ American Women and American Values’, in L. Bryson (ed.). Facing the Future’s Risks, Harper, New York, 1953.Google Scholar
  13. Lansing, J. B., Withey, S. B., Wolfe, A. C., Working Papers on Survey Research in Poverty Areas, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Lepley, R. (ed.), The Language of Value, Columbia University Press, New York, 1957.Google Scholar
  15. Morgan, J. H., Baker, E., and Sonquist, J. A., Searching for Structure, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Morris, C. and Jones, L. V., ‘Value Scales and Dimensions’, Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 51 (1955) 523–535.Google Scholar
  17. Rokeach, M., The Nature of Human Values, Free Press, New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  18. Survey Research Center, University of Michigan, Survey of Working Conditions, 1969, U.S. Government Printing Office (No. 2916-0001), Washington, D.C., 1971.Google Scholar
  19. White, R. K., ‘Value Analysis: A Quantitative Method for Describing Qualitative Data’, Journal of Social Psychology 19 (1944) 351–358.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank M. Andrews
    • 1
  • Stephen B. Withey
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations