Advertisement

History as the Unveiling of the Telos. the Husserlian Critique of the Wel Tanschauungen

  • Nicoletta Ghigi
Chapter
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 90)

Keywords

Regulative Ideal Rigorous Science Objective Validity Positive Science Historical Sense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    W. Dilthey, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften. Versuch einer Grundlegung für das Studium der Gesellschaft und der Geschichte, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. I (Stuttgart: B. G. Teuber, 1962), p. 116.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Dilthey, Ideen über eine bescreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. V, cit., p. 143.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Dilthey, Entwürfe zur Kritik der historischen Vernunft, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. VII, cit., p. 194.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    W. Dilthey, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. I, cit., p. 116.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Dilthey, Der Auf bau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Gesteswissenschaften, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. VII, cit., p. 119.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Dilthey, Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. I, cit., p. 24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ib., p. 27.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ib., p. 29.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ib., p. 30.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ib., p. 28.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ib., p. 33.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. G. Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, 1986), p. 254.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E. Husserl, Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft, in Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921), Analecta Husserliana Vol. XXV, Nemon-Sepp (ed.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1986), p. 36.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    “From the height of philosophy as a rigorous science,” explains Semerari, “the Diltheyan emancipation of the Geisteswissenschaften from the physicalist models was viewed as something not decisive, since the essential problem, for Husserl, was asserting the difference of ontological and epistemological status between the sciences of fact — natural or historical may they be — and the sciences of essence, between positive sciences and a priori sciences”. (G. Semerari, Husserl su Dilthey, in AA. VV., Wilhelm Dilthey. Critica della metafisicae ragione storica, G. Cacciatore and G. Cantillo (eds.), Bologna: Il Mulino, 1985, p. 357).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    E. Husserl, Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft, cit., p. 43.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Ib., pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ib., p. 52.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution, Analecta Husserliana Vol. IV, M. Biemel (ed.) (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1952), p. 173.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    W. Dilthey, Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissencschaften, in Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. VII, cit., p. 173.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. Dilthey, Brief an Husserl 29.VI.1911, in Briefwechsel Vol. VI. Philosophenbriefe, Husserliana Dokumente, K. Schumann (ed.) (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994), p. 43. In other words, according to him, if by metaphysic one intends the metaphysical philosophy of history formulated in an exemplary way by Hegel, then this metaphysic must be abandoned, because it can say nothing reasonable, or effectively true, about existence and the problems of the sciences of the spirit.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Husserl, Philosophie als strenge Wissenschaft, cit., p. 12.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    W. Dilthey, Brief an Husserl 29.VI.1911, cit., p. 45.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    E. Husserl, Brief an Dilthey 5/6.VII.1911, cit., pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ib., p. 49.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ib., p 50.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    A. Ales Bello, Fenomenologia e filosofia ermeneutica (a proposito delle «visioni del mondo»), in “Filosofia e insegnamento” 1991 (22), p. 7.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    E. Husserl, Die Krisis der europäische Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, Analecta Husserliana Vol. VI, W. Biemel (ed.) (The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1954), p. 346.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The Soltheyan accusation of an extreme Platonism implicit in Husserlian eidetic phenomenology is well known. Husser defended himself many times, in the name of a genetic meaning of phenomenology (cf. E. Husserl, Brief an Natorp 29.VI.1918, cit.).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    E. Husserl, Die Krisis der europäische Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie. Ergänzunsband. Texte aus dem Nachlaβ (1934–1937), Analecta Husserliana Vol. XXIX, R. N. Smid (ed.) (Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992), p 418.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicoletta Ghigi
    • 1
  1. 1.University of PerugiaPerugia

Personalised recommendations