Ego-Making Principle in Samkhya Metaphysics and Cosmology

  • Marzenna Jakubczak
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 89)


Phenomenal Consciousness Pure Awareness American Oriental Society Transitional Subject Individua Lity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aśvaghosa, Buddhacarita, or Acts of the Buddha, E. H. Johnston (trans.). Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press, 1933.Google Scholar
  2. Bhattacharyya, N.N., “Cosmogony of the Sā\( \dot n \) khya and the Range of its Influence”, in: History of Indian Cosmogonical Ideas (New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal, 1971).Google Scholar
  3. Biardeau, M., “Ahā\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) kara. The Ego Principle in the Upani\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \) ad,” Contribution to Indian Sociology 8 (1965): 62–84.Google Scholar
  4. van Buitenen, J. A. B., “Studies in Sā\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) khya (II). Ahā\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) kāra”, Journal of the American Oriental Society 77 (1957): 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gupta, B., Cit. Consciousness (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  6. Hulin, M., “Reinterpreting ‘aha\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) kāra’ as a Possible Way of Solving the Riddle of Sā\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) khya Metaphysics” in: Asiatische Studien. Études Asiatiques, LIII:3 (1999), J. Bronkhorst (ed.). Bern: Peter Lang, 1999.Google Scholar
  7. Ingarden, Roman. “Człowiek i czas” in: Książeczka o człowieku (Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 1987).Google Scholar
  8. Johnston, E. H., Early Sā\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) khya. An Essay on its Historical Development According to the Texts. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1937.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, Immanuel. The Critique of Pure Reason, N. Smith (trans.). New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. Larson, G. J., Classical Sā\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{m} \) khya. An Interpretation of its History and Meaning. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1979.Google Scholar
  11. The Principal Upani\( \underset{\raise0.3em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\cdot}$}}{s} \)ads. Servapali Radhakrishnan (ed. and trans.). London: George Allen & Unwin, 1953.Google Scholar
  12. Schweizer, P., “Mind/Consciousness Dualism in Sā\( \dot n \) khya-Yoga Philosophy”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1993): 845–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wittgenstein, L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, C. K. Ogden (trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marzenna Jakubczak
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Philosophy and SociologyPedagogical University of KrakowPoland

Personalised recommendations