Advertisement

Lessons from Sartre for the Analytic Phiolosophy of Mind

  • Manuel Bremer
Part of the Analecta Husserliana book series (ANHU, volume 88)

§ 10. Conclusion

One major short coming of the analytic philosophy of mind seems to be keeping insufficiently apart the Self as constructed biographical object from the Ego as the subject of our conscious acts. Even if the Ego is an aspect/is tied to a Self its functions and its phenomenology require a theory of its own. Narrowing the attention to the Self downsizes self-awareness to an awareness of an object “Self”. A motivation to avoid a theory of the Ego may have been the fear of being committed to extravagant metaphysics. Keeping Self and Ego apart, however, allows to substantiate the thesis that all awareness of something is at the same time awareness of oneself. Sartre’s version of this thesis, using the pre-reflexive cogito, helps here. It can be synthesised with a de se account of self-awareness. Both parts may shed light on each other and come closer to saving the phenomena.

Keywords

Cognitive System Singular Term Analytic Philosophy Propositional Attitude Conscious State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Bremer, Manuel. “Animal Consciousness as a Test Case of Cognitive Science. Some Theses.” In Bewusstsein. Munchen: Interdisziplinaire Perspektiven, 2004.Google Scholar
  2. Carruthers, Peter.Language, Thought and Consciousness. Cambridge: 1996.Google Scholar
  3. Chalmers, David. The Conscious Mind. New York/Oxford: 1996.Google Scholar
  4. Chisholm, Roderick. The First Person. An Essay on Reference and Intentionality. Minneapolis: 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Dennett, Daniel. Consciousness Explained. London: 1991.Google Scholar
  6. Dummett, Michael. Urspruünge der analyischen Philosophie. Frankfurt a.M.: 1975.Google Scholar
  7. Fodor, Jerry. The Language of Thought. Cambridge/MA: 1975.Google Scholar
  8. —. “Jerry Fodor.” In Samuel Guttenplan (ed.), Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: 1994.Google Scholar
  9. Husserl, Edmund. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Tubingen: 1913.Google Scholar
  10. Kenevan, Phyllis. “Self-Consciousness and the Ego in the Philosophy of Sartre.” In P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre. La Salle: 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, David. “Attitudes De Dicto and De Se.” Philosophical Review, 88 (1979): 513–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCulloch, Gergory. Using Sartre. U An Analytical Introduction to Early Sartrean Themes. London: 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Merek, Prayoon. Sartre’s Existentialism and Early Buddhism. Bangkok: 1988.Google Scholar
  14. Metzinger, Thomas. “Faster Than Thought: Holism, Homogeneity and Temporal Coding.” In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Conscious Experience. Lawrence: 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Minsky, Marvin. The Society of Mind. New York: 1985.Google Scholar
  16. Natorp, Paul. Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode. Tübingen: 1912.Google Scholar
  17. Perry, Jon. “The Problem of the Essential Indexical.” Nous XIII (1979): 3–21.Google Scholar
  18. Pothast, Ulrich. Über einige Fragen der Selbstbeziehung. Frankfurt a.M.: 1971.Google Scholar
  19. Priest, Stephen. The Subject in Question. Sartre’s Critique of Husserl in The Transcendence of the Ego. London: 2000.Google Scholar
  20. Pylyshyn, Zenon. Computation and Cognition. 5th edition. Cambridge: 1989.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenthal, David. “Multiple Drafts and Facts of the Matter.” In Thomas Metzinger (ed.), Conscious Experience. Lawrence: 1995.Google Scholar
  22. Sartre, Jean Paul. “La Transcendence de L’Ego: Esquisse d’une descriprion phénoménologique.” Recherches Philosophiques, VI; quoted by the English edition The Transcendence of the Ego. New York: 1960 (1937).Google Scholar
  23. —. L’etre et le neant. Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: 1943.Google Scholar
  24. — (1948). “Conscience de soi et connaissance de soi”, Bulletin de la Société Francaise de Philosophie, XLII; quoted by the German edition Bewußtsein und Selbsterkenntnis. Hamburg: 1973.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Bremer
    • 1
  1. 1.Heinrich-Heine-Universität DüsseldorfDüsseldorf

Personalised recommendations