Skip to main content

Changes in College Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Equilibrium

  • Chapter
Research and the Quality of Science Education

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe the evolution of conceptions about chemical equilibrium based on observations/interactions with selected chemistry students using an instructional design which included constructivist strategies such as POEs, analogies, small group discussions, and journal writing. Two intact classes with a total of 75 students enrolled in a general chemistry course participated in the study. The conceptual evolution of six students was followed through the use of pre-tests, transcripts of audiotaped and videotaped group discussions, written answers to activity sheets, learning journals, interviews, and post-tests. The students started with concepts of complete reactions and progressed to developing concepts of reversibility but had difficulty with the dynamic nature of reversible reactions. The use of an analogy using double-sided disks helped in the students’ visualization of the microscopic processes taking place and in the properties of systems as they approach and when they reach equilibrium. However, students’ conceptions of complete reactions still competed with their conceptions of reversible reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berg, E. van den, Alfafara, R., & Dalman, T. (1998). Case studies of science and mathematics teaching in the Philippines and lessons for teacher and school development. National Association of Research in Science Teaching. San Diego, U.S.A., April 19–22, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, E. van den (2003). Teaching, Learning, and Quick Feedback Methods. The Australian Science Teaching Journal, June 2003, 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, W. & Heikkinen, H. (1990). Students’ Ideas Regarding Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 67(12), 1000–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucat, R. & Fensham, P (1995). Teaching and Learning about Chemical Equilibrium. In R. Bucat and P. Fensham (Eds.) Selected Papers in Chemical Education Research. The Committee on Teaching of Chemistry of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho, M. & Good, R. (1989). Problem Solving and Chemical Equilibrium: Successful and Unsuccessful Performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(2), 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A.B., Gunstone, R.F., & Klopfer, L.E. (1985). Effecting changes in cognitive structure among physics students. In: West, L., Pines, L. Cognitive structure and conceptual change. Orlando: Academic Press, 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C.A. & Brewer, W.F. (1993). The role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel, J. van (1990). Betrokken bij Evenwicht (Involved with Equilibrium). Utrecht, CD-β Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel, J. van, Vos, W. de, & Verloop, N. (1998a). Introducing Dynamic Equilibrium as an Explanatory Model. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 559–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel, J. van, Vos, W. de, & Verloop, N. (1998b). Developing Secondary Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Reactions: The Introduction of Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 379–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driel, J. van, Gräber, W. (2003). The teaching and learning of chemical equilibrium. In: J. Gilbert et al Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, P.J., Garnett, P.J. & Hackling, M.(1995). Students’ Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry: A Review of Research and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Studies in Science Education, 25, 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, S.M., Yeany, R.H. & Britton, B. (1991). A Constructive View of Learning Science. In S.M. Glynn, R.H. Yeany and B. Britton (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussarsky, E. Gorodetsky, M. (1988). On the chemical equilibrium concept: Constrained word associations and conceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(5), 319–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M.W., & Garnett, P.J. (1985). Misconceptions of chemical equilibrium. European Journal of Science Education, 7, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, J.A. & Buckley, P. D. (2000). Simulating Dynamic Equilibria: A Class Experiment. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(8), 1013–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, P.W., & Hewson, M.G. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of science instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddle, P. A. & Pillay, A. E. (1996). An In-depth Study of Misconceptions in Stoichiometry and Chemical Equilibrium at a South African University, Journal Of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huddle, P.A., White, M. & Rogers, F. (2000). Simulations for Teaching Chemical Equilibrium. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 920–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E. (1978). The Development and Validation of a Classroom Test of Formal Reasoning, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A.E., Baker, W., DiDonato, L., Verdi, M. & Johnson, M. (1993). The Role of Hypothetico-deductive Reasoning and Physical Analogues of Molecular Interaction in Conceptual Change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(9), 1073–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, E. (1997). Peer Teaching. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakhleh, M.B. (1992). Why Some Students Don’t Learn Chemistry ? Chemical Misconceptions. Journal Of Chemical Education, 69(3), 191–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W. & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a Scientific Conception: Towards a Theory of Conceptual Change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerset, A., Alfafara, R. & Dalman, T. (1999). Effective and ineffective pedagogy compared: Science and mathematics teacher needs assessment study, Part II. Cebu City (Philippines): University of San Carlos Science and Mathematics Education Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thijs, G.D., & Berg, E. van den (1995). Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions in physics. Science and Education, 4, 317–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R.T., & R. Gunstone. (1992). Probing Understanding. London: Falmer Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Locaylocay, J., van den Berg, E., Magno, M. (2005). Changes in College Students’ Conceptions of Chemical Equilibrium. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics