Skip to main content

Investigating Teachers’ Ideas about Models and Modelling — Some Issues of Authenticity

  • Chapter
Research and the Quality of Science Education

Abstract

‘Models and modelling’ has made an increased contribution to research in science education in recent years. Almost all the papers published discuss either the ideas expressed by teachers/students or the implications of such ideas for the practice of science teaching/learning. Here we focus on the research instruments that we have developed in the last six years to investigate teachers’ ideas about the theme. The paper discusses the strengths and limitations of the instruments and their influence on the ‘authenticity’ of the knowledge so gained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 239.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning and C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 341–381). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education, 5th ed. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K. & Boulter, C.J. (1995). Stretching models too far. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, 18–22 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, Part 1: Horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K. & Osborne, R.J. (1980). The Use of Models in Science and Science Teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 2(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J.K. & Watts, D.M. (1983). Concepts, misconceptions, and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education, 10, 61–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 799–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A.G. & Treagust, D.F. (2000). A Typology of School Science Models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R. & Gilbert, J. (2002a). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R. & Gilbert, J. (2002b). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R. & Gilbert, J. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justi, R. & Gilbert, J. (in preparation). On the Notion of ‘Level’ in the Understanding of Models.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R.E. (1989). Models for Understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S.B. (1988). Case Study Research in Education — A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco and London: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirham, G. (1972). The modelling process. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-2, 621–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N.J. (1999). Model-Based Reasoning in Conceptual Change. In L. Magnani, N.J. Nersessian and P. Thagard (Eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. (pp. 5–22) New York: Kluwer and Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D.A. (1983). Some Observations on Mental Models. In D. Gentner and A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental Models (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twyman, M. (1985). Using pictorial language: a discussion of the dimensions of the problem. In: T. M. Duffy (Ed.), Designing Usable Texts (pp. 245–312). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viana, A.P.P. and Justi, R. (2001). Investigação sobre Concep ç ões de Professores de Química Relacionadas a Modelos [Investigation on Chemistry Teachers’ Ideas about Models]. Research report. Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Department of Chemistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Justi, R., Gilbert, J.K. (2005). Investigating Teachers’ Ideas about Models and Modelling — Some Issues of Authenticity. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics