Abstract
Gentner has described analogy as a mapping of terms from a base (better known) domain to a target domain. She asserts that use of analogy can lead to new conclusions in the target domain. This ‘structure mapping’ theory, though useful, does not yet describe the process of analogical reasoning. We will argue that an analogy can be used productively in a process that has two phases: first, constructing the analogy using existing knowledge of base and target domains, and second, extrapolating the analogy within the target domain. In the first phase object mapping is motivated by the recognition of mappable relations. In the second phase, the productive use of the analogy can involve creation of both new terms and relations, as a result of mapping existing terms and relations from the base domain. If analogies are to be understood critically, then a third phase might be the testing of new relations against learners’ experience. This three-phase process description of analogy has been tried out in a teaching experiment that aimed at an understanding of entropy, by an analogy to falling water. We conclude that this three-phase description is useful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arnold, M. & Millar, R. (1996). Learning the scientific “story”: a case study in the teaching and learning of elementary thermodynamics. Science education 80(3), 249–281.
Baker, W.P. & Lawson, A.E. (2001). Complex instructional analogies and theoretical concept acquisition in college genetics. Science Education 85(6), 665–683.
Brown, D.E. (1993). Refocusing core intuitions: a concretizing role for analogy in conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(10), 1273–1290.
Carnot, S. (1824). Reflexions sur la puissance motrice du feu et sur les machines propres à déveloper cette puissance. Edition critique par R. Fox, 1978, Paris: J. Vrin.
Clement, J. (1993). Using bridging analogies and anchoring intuitions to deal with students’ preconceptions in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(10), 1241–1257.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 7, 155–170.
Gentner D. & Gentner, D.R. (1983). Flowing waters or teeming crowds: mental models of electricity. In D. Gentner & A.L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp.99–129). Hillsdale N.J.: Erlbaum.
Gentner, D. & Holyoak, K.J. (1997). Reasoning and learning by analogy: Introduction. American Psychologist 52(1), 32–34.
Gick, M.L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive psychology 15, 1–38.
Glynn, S.M. (1989). The Teaching-with-Analogies (TWA) model: Explaining concepts in expository text. In K.D. Muth (Ed.), Children’s comprehension of narrative and expository text: research into practice (pp.185–204), Newark DeI.: International Reading Association.
Glynn, S.M. & Takahashi, T. (1998). Learning from analogy-enhanced science text. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(10), 1129–1149.
Haeberlen, S. & Schwedes, H. (1999). Learning-processes in analogy-based instruction about electricity: learning to understand the water-model. In M. Komorek et al., Research in Science Education: Past, Present, and Future, proceedings of the second international conference of the ESERA, (vol. 1, pp.198–201). Kiel: IPN. Online at: http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/projekte/esera/book/eserbook.htm
Herrmann, F. (1989). Physik, Unterrichtshilfen. Teil 1, Auflage November 1989. Karlsruhe: Institut für Didaktik der Physik der Universität Karlsruhe.
Kurtz, K.J., Miao, C.-H. & Gentner, D. (2001). Learning by analogical bootstrapping. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 10(4), 417–446.
Zeitoun, H.H. (1984). Teaching scientific analogies: a proposed model. Research in Science & Technological Education 2(2), 107–125.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaper, W., Goedhart, M. (2005). A Three-Phase Design for Productive Use of Analogy in the Teaching of Entropy. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3673-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)