Abstract
There is evidence that many science teachers have limited expertise in teaching the epistemology of science (the ways in which knowledge claims in science are developed and justified). We examine the classroom talk of seven teachers as they use published lesson resources to teach about the development of scientific models in two concept areas (cell membrane structure and electromagnetism). Our aim is to provide recommendations for the content and form of professional development activities likely to support teachers’ effective uptake of these, and similar, teaching resources. We first provide a characterisation of the content of science-related classroom talk. Two distinctive lines of talk related to conceptual development can be identified in each of the Cell Membranes lessons, and an additional line of talk in each of the lessons focuses on the epistemology of science. Handling these distinctive classroom conversations was a new pedagogical challenge for these teachers. We then identify features of classroom talk likely to constrain or promote student learning about the epistemology of science. Several teachers supported student learning by making explicit statements about what students were intended to learn about the epistemology of science. Teachers also made links to other lessons to exemplify epistemic issues in a variety of science concept areas. The paper ends with a discussion of the design of continuing professional development activities to support teachers in introducing epistemic ideas in the science curriculum.
Keywords
- Science Teaching
- Science Teacher
- Professional Development Activity
- Cell Membrane Structure
- Teacher Talk
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1995). Science for all Americans. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press.
Brickhouse, N. W., Dagher, Z. R., Letts, W. J., & Shipman, H. L. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an Astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37,4 340–362.
Brown, S., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over Machine. New York: Free Press.
Hind, A. (2002). Teaching and learning about the nature of scientific theoretical models as part of an AS level programme. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Hind, A., Leach, J., & Ryder, J. (2000). Nuffield Teaching About Science: Resources for AS/A level. Retrieved June, 2004, from http://www.nuffieldcurriculumcentre.org/go/minisite/Post16TeachingAboutScience/Introduction
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Leach, Hind, A., & Ryder, J. (2003). Designing and evaluating short teaching interventions about the epistemology of science in high school. Science Education, 87, 831–848.
Leach, Millar, R., Ryder, J., & Séré, M. G. (2000). Epistemological understanding in science learning: the consistency of representations across contexts. Learning and Instruction, 10(6), 497–527.
Lederman. (1994). Students’ and Teachers’ conceptions of the Nature of Science: A review of the research. Journal of research in science teaching, 29,4 331–359.
Lederman. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929.
Lederman, & Abd El Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 83126). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Lederman, Lederman, J. S., Khishfe, R., Druger, E., Gnoffo, G., & Tantoco, C. (2003, March 23–26). Project ICAN: A multi-layered model of professional development. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of History and Philosophy of Science. Routledge.
McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (2000). The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
Roth, W. M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From “Truth” to “Invented Reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34,2 145–179.
Scott, P. H. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45–80.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1 1–21 February.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ryder, J., Hind, A., Leach, J. (2005). Teaching about the Epistemology of Science in School Science Classrooms: Case Studies of Teachers’ Experiences. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3673-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)
