Skip to main content

Reflections on a Problem Posing Approach

  • Chapter

Abstract

This paper describes some general aspects of the problem posing approach, as developed at the CSMEU. It describes why this approach has been developed; what didactical problem it tries to focus on; from what perspective this is done; to what didactical structures such an approach may lead, and what its application may involve for a teacher. The arguments are endorsed by examples taken from recent PhD work, but placed within a wider perspective.

Keywords

  • Teaching Process
  • Teaching Sequence
  • Science Education Research
  • Cognitive Learning
  • Local Motive

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   239.00
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, M.R. (1998). The learning cycle approach as a strategy for instruction in science. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.) International Handbook of Science Education (pp.513–524). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (2002). Bringing about change in the classroom: strengths and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach. Learning and Instruction, 12, 589–604.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R. & Schauble, L. (2003). Design Experiments in Educational Research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. & Treagust, D.F. (1998). Learning in science — From behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B.J. Fraser & G. Tobin (Eds.) International Handbook on Science Education (pp.3–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunstone, R. (1992). Constructivism and metacognition: theoretical issues and classroom studies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (pp.129–140). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joling, E., van Lierop, A., van Soest, W., Kaper, W., ten Voorde, H.H., de Vos, W., Mellink, E., Snel, B. & Timmer, J. (1988). Chemie mavo: onderzoek naar het functioneren van een leergang scheikunde. Amsterdam: SCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaassen, C.W.J.M. (1995). A problem posing approach to teaching the topic of radioactivity. Utrecht: CD-β Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortland, J. (2001). A Problem Posing Approach to Teaching Decision Making about the Waste Issue. Utrecht: CD-ß Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J. & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist Perspective on Learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L., Kortland, J., Eijkelhof, H.M.C., van Genderen, D. & Hooymayers, H.P. (1990). A thematic physics curriculum: a balance between contradictory curriculum forces. Science Education, 74, 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L. (1995). ‘Developmental research’ as a way to an empirically based ‘didactical structure’ of science. Science Education, 79, 189–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L. (2000). Didactics of Science: the forgotten dimension in science education research? In R. Millar, J. Leach & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education — The contribution of research (pp.308–326). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L. (2003). Developmental Research: its aims, methods and outcomes. In D. Krnel (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th ESERA Phd-Summerschool. University of Ljubljana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijnse, P.L. & Klaassen, C.W.J.M. (2004). Didactical structures as an outcome of research on teaching-learning sequences? International Journal of Science Education (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Méheut, M. & Psillos, D. (2004). Teaching-Learning Sequences. International Journal of Science Education (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P.H., Asoko, H.M. & Driver, R.H. (1992). Teaching for conceptual change: a review of strategies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H. Niedderer (Eds.) Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies (pp.310–329). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taconis, R., Ferguson-Hessler, M.G.M. & Broekkamp, H. (2001) Teaching science problem solving: an overview of experimental work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 442–468.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vollebregt, M.J. (1998). A Problem Posing Approach to Teaching an Initial Particle Model. Utrecht: CD-β Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lijnse, P. (2005). Reflections on a Problem Posing Approach. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics