Abstract
Ten high-school chemistry teachers and two staff members from the Science Teaching Department of the Weizmann Institute of Science who served as coordinators participated in a one-year professional development program aimed at enhancing the teaching and learning of chemistry using Action Research methodology. In Action Research, teachers research their own practice of teaching. The program involved monthly meetings throughout the year at the Science Teaching Department. Here we present two case studies which will serve as examples of the program. In the first study, teachers investigated their students’ misconceptions about the electrical conductivity of metals and ionic materials. The second study focused on the behavior of non-science-oriented students and their attitudes toward chemistry studies. The program included an evaluation of the process that teachers underwent while doing their classroom research; the evaluation was done by the workshop coordinators. Based on the findings of these two studies, we may conclude that involving teachers in an intensive workshop dealing with various aspects of teaching and with investigating their own work, provides teachers with tools for systematically diagnosing students’ learning difficulties and the ability to change their instruction accordingly. Moreover, the workshop experience supported an environment of collegiality and enabled teachers to collaborate with professional researchers and other teachers.
Keywords
- Professional Development
- Science Teaching
- Prospective Teacher
- Ionic Solution
- Achievement Test
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bodzin, A.M., & Mamlok, R. (2000). STS Simulations engaging students with issues-based scenarios. The Science Teacher, 8(1), 36–39.
Bybee, R.W. & Trowbridge, L.W. (1996). Teaching Secondary School Science: Strategies for Developing Scientific Literacy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Coll, R.K., & Taylor, T. (2001). Alternative conceptions of chemical bonding held by upper secondary and tertiary students. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 171–191.
Elkis, I., & Ralle, B. ( 2002). Participatory Action Research within chemical education. Proceeding of the 16th Symposium on Chemical Education held at the University of Dortmund, 22–24, May 2002, Shaker Verlag, Aachen.
Feldman, A. (1996). Enhancing the practice of physics teachers: Mechanisms for generation and sharing knowledge and understanding in collaborative Action Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 513–540.
Feldman, A., & Minstrel, J. (2000). Action Research as a research methodology for study of teaching and learning science. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 429–455).
Garnett, P.J., & Treagust, D.F. (1992). Conceptual difficulties experienced by senior high school students of electrochemistry: Electrochemical (galvanic) and electrolytic cells. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(2), 1079–1099.
Gipe, J.P., & Richards, J.C. (1992). Reflective thinking and growth in novices’ teaching abilities. Journal of Educational Research, 86(2), 52–57.
Gore, J.M., & Zeichner, K.M. (1991). Action Research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching & Teacher Education, 7(2), 119–136.
Harrison, A.G., & Treagust, D.F. (2000). Learning about atoms, molecules, and chemical bonds: A case study of multiple model use in grade 11 chemistry. Science Education, 84, 352–381.
Harrison, A.G., & Treagust, D.F. (1996). Secondary students’ mental models of atoms and molecules: Implications for teaching science. Science Education, 80, 509–534.
Hoffman, J.L., & Krajcik, J.S. (1999). Assessing the nature of learning science content understandings as a result of utilizing on-line resources. Paper Presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA, U.S.A.
Hofstein, A. (2001, April). Action Research: Involving Classroom-Related Studies and Professional Development. Paper presented at IOSTE conference, Paralimni, Cyprus.
Hofstein, A. & Walberg, H.J. (1995). Instructional Strategies. In: B.J. Fraser & H.J. Walberg (Eds.). Improving Science Education (pp. 70–89). The National Society for the Study of Education.
Hofstein, A., Mamlok, R., & Carmeli, M. (1997). Science teachers as curriculum developers of science and technology for all. Science Education International, 8(2), 26–36.
Holly, P. (1991). Action research: The missing linking the creation of schools as centers of inquiry. In A. Liberman & L. Millaer (Eds.). Staff Development for Education in the 90’s: New demands, New Realities, New perspectives. (pp.133–157). New York: Teachers College Press.
Kemmis, S., & Mctaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. (Eds.) Geelong, Victoria, BC, Canada: Deakin University Press.
Korthagen, F.A.J. (1985). Reflective teaching and preservice teacher education in the Netherlands. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 11–15.
Lewis, I., & Munn, P. (1987). So you want to do research! A guide for teachers on how to formulate research questions. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing Professional Development for Teachers of Science and Mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Mamlok-Naaman, R., Navon, O., Carmeli, M., & Hofstein, A. (2003). Teachers research their students’ understanding of electrical conductivity, The Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, The Royal Australian Chemical Institute, Chemical Education Division, in press
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Niaz, M. (2002). Facilitating conceptual change in students’ understanding of electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 425–439.
Obaya, O. (2003) Action Research: Creating a context for science teaching and learning. Science Education International, 14(1), 37–47.
O’Hanlon, C. (1996). Professional Development through Action Research in Educational Settings’. (Ed.). Washington, DC: Falmer.
Ozkaya, A.R. (2002). Conceptual difficulties experienced by prospective teachers in electrochemistry: Half-cell potential, cell potential, and chemical and electrochemical equilibrium in galvantic cells. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(6), 735–738.
Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Tobin, K., Tippins, D.J. & Gallard, A.J. (1994). Research on instructional strategies for teaching science. In: D.L. (Ed.). Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 62–63). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Van Zee, E. H. (1998) Preparing teachers as researchers in courses on methods of teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(7), 791–809.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1996). New Directions in Action Research. London: Falmer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Spriner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mamlok-Naaman, R., Navon, O., Carmeli, M., Hofstein, A. (2005). Chemistry Teachers Research Their Own Work: Two Case Studies. In: Boersma, K., Goedhart, M., de Jong, O., Eijkelhof, H. (eds) Research and the Quality of Science Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3673-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3672-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3673-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)