Advertisement

Education in the Knowledge Age — Engaging Learners Through Knowledge Building

Chapter

Abstract

In this Knowledge Age or innovation-driven age, knowledge is a key asset for a society to create value. The health and wealth of societies depend increasingly on the capacity of people to innovate (Scardamalia & Bereiter, in press 2002). Since schools are responsible for preparing the young for the future they have to be models of innovation, where teachers and students are “willing to take new routes, try different methods, and occasionally break the mould” (Shanmugaratnam, 2003). Too often, however, we find classroom pedagogies varying between two extremes: didactic knowledge transmission where teachers are the “sage on the stage”, or constructivist approaches where students are actively engaged on activities. The former approach is often criticized for treating students as a passive party, assuming that knowledge can be transmitted and assimilated into the student’s mind. The latter approach, on the other hand, has the tendency to motivate students to complete tasks and activities, but not necessarily engaged with the knowledge creation process. In this chapter, we argue that we should engage our students directly in knowledge production, not so much of asking students to produce new knowledge or discoveries, but putting them into a development trajectory to be knowledge producers. Examples of knowledge building classrooms in Cananda and Singapore schools will be used to illustrate how we can engage students as knowledge producers, who take on ownership of learning by collaboratively and continually improve upon their initial ideas to better ideas, thus advancing collective knowledge within the community.

Keywords

engaged learning knowledge building constructivist learning Knowledge Forum professional development Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In D.R. Olson, & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 485–513). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Casewell, B., Lamon, M. (1998). Development of scientific literacy: The evolution of ideas in a Grade Four knowledge-building classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA, April 13–17.Google Scholar
  3. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
  4. Duffy, T. & Jonassen, D. (Eds.) (1992). Constructivism: New implications for instructional technology. In T.M. Duffy & D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 1–16). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Emergence of progressive-inquiry culture in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Learning Environments Research, 6(2),199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hewitt, J. (2001). From a focus on tasks to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. In Koschmann, T., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.), CSCL 2 carrying forward the conversation: Computers, cognition, and work (pp.11–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, B., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1994). Designing Learning and Technology for Educational Reform. Oak Brook, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.Google Scholar
  8. Lamon, M., Reeve, R. & Scardamalia, M. (2001, April). Mapping the growth of deeply principled understandings in a knowledge building community. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Seattle, WA. Retrieved 22 March 2004 from http://ikit.org/lamon/mapping.htmlGoogle Scholar
  9. Meehan, S., & Nolan, M. (2001). Handbook of engaged learning projects. Retrieved on 21 March 2004 from http://www-ed.fnal.gov/help/cover.htmlGoogle Scholar
  10. Perkins, D.N. (1991). Technology meets constructivism: Do they make a marriage? Educational Technology, 31(5), 18–23.Google Scholar
  11. Scardamalia, M. (1999). Moving Ideas to the Center. In L. Harasim (Ed.), Wisdom & Wizardry: Celebrating the Pioneers of Online Education (pp. 14–15). Vancouver, BC: Telelearning, Inc.Google Scholar
  12. Scardamalia, M. (2004). CSILE/Knowledge Forum®. In Educational technology: An encyclopedia. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
  13. Scardamalia, M. (2003). Knowledge building environments: Extending the limits of the possible in education and knowledge work. In Encyclopedia of distributed learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2002). Knowledge building. In Encyclopedia of education (2nd Ed.). New York: Macmillan Reference, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Shanmugaratnam, T. (2003). Speech at the MOE Work Plan Seminar at Ngee Ann Polytechnic on Thursday, 2 October 2003. Retrieved 31 March, 2004, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/speeches/2003/sp20031002.htmGoogle Scholar
  16. Trilling, B., & Hood, P. (1999). Learning, technology, and education reform in the Knowledge Age or “We’re Wired, Webbed, and Windowed, Now What?” Educational Technology, 39(3), 5–18.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Labor, Secretary’s Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills (SCANS). (1992). Learning a Living: a Blueprint for High Performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of LaborGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanyang Technological UniversitySingapore
  2. 2.University of TorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations