Advertisement

Exploring the Concept of Dialogue in the Self-Study of Teaching Practices

  • Peggy Placier
  • Stefinee Pinnegar
  • Mary Lynn Hamilton
  • Karen Guilfoyle
Chapter
Part of the Self Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices book series (STEP, volume 2)

Abstract

This papaer examines professional dialogue as a crucial element in r self-study practice and research. Over time our group has consistently employed professional dialogue to critically explore our work. Using electronic communiqués, institutional documents, informal interviews, and more we have recorded and analyzed our experiences in academia and beyond. In this work we begin to question Dialogue as either method or methodology. We consider the interweaving: how we talk about practice and how we practice teaching and teacher education individually, collectively, and individually again. We consider the themes of community, cycles, and knowledge building for knowing and using dialogue. Finally we assert that through dialogue, we come to more clearly walk our talk.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arizona Group: Guilfoyle, K,, Hamilton, M.L., Pinnegar, S. and Placier, P., 1995, Becoming teachers of teachers: The paths of four beginners, in: Russell T. and Korthagen, F., ed., Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education, Falmer Press, London, pp.35–55.Google Scholar
  2. Arizona Group, 2004, The epistemological dimensions and dynamics of professional practice, in: Loughran, J., Hamilton, M.L., LaBoskey, V. K., and Russell, T., Ed., International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, Part Two., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 1109–1168.Google Scholar
  3. Bakhtin, M.M., 1981, The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M.M. Bakhtin, in: Michael Holquist, ed., University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  4. Boal, A., 1992, Games for actors and non-actors (A. Jackson trans.), Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  5. Burbules, N.C. and Rice, S., 1991, Dialogue across differences: Continuing the conversation, Harvard Educational Review, 61: 393–416.Google Scholar
  6. Bohm, D., 1990, Meaning, purpose and exploration in dialogue, http://www.muc.de/-heuvel/dialogue/dialogue_exp10ration. html (accessed February 2002).Google Scholar
  7. Brogan, B.R. and Brogan, W.A., 1995, The Socratic questioner: Teaching and learning in the dialogical classroom, The Educational Forum, 59: 288–296.Google Scholar
  8. Brundage, S.E., 1996, What kind of supervision do veteran teachers need? An invitation to expand collegial dialogue and research, Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 12: 90–94.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, C. M., 2001, Talking shop: Authentic conversation and teacher learning, Teachers College Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Cochran-Smith, M. and Fries, M., 2001, Sticks, stones, and ideology: The discourse of reform in teacher education, Educational Researcher 30: 3–15Google Scholar
  11. Fenstermacher, G. D., 1986, Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects, in: Wittrock, M. C., ed., Handbook of research on teaching, 3rd: A project of the American Educational Research Association, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
  12. Flecha, R., 1999, Modern and postmodern racism in Europe: Dialogic approaches and antiracist pedagogies, Harvard Educational Review, 69: 150–171.Google Scholar
  13. Flores, L.A., 2000, Reclaiming the “other”: Toward a Chicana feminist critical perspective, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24: 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freire, P., 2000, Pedagogy of freedom: Ethics, democracy and civic courage, Rowan and Littlefield, Lanham MD.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. and Macedo, D.P., 1995, A dialogue: Culture, language and race, Harvard Educational Review, 65: 377–402.Google Scholar
  16. Gitlin, A. and Russell, R., 1994, Robyn’s story: Out of the silence, Teacher Education Quarterly, 21: 121–144.Google Scholar
  17. Greene, O.M., 1996, In pursuit of professional dialogue, Teacher Education Quarterly, 13: 41–43.Google Scholar
  18. Gurevitch, Z.O., 1990, The dialogic connection and the ethics of dialogue, British Journal of Sociology, 41: 181–196.Google Scholar
  19. Gurevitch, Z.O., 2001, Dialectical dialogue: The struggle for speech, repressive silence, and the shift to multiplicity, British Journal of Sociology, 52: 87–104.Google Scholar
  20. Habermas, J., 1984, The theory of communicative action (T. McCarthy, Trans.), Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Hollingsworth, S., 1992, Learning to teach through collaborative conversations: A feminist approach, American Educational Research Journal, 29: 373–404.Google Scholar
  22. John-Steiner, V., Weber, R.J., Minnis, M., 1998, The challenge of studying collaboration, American Educational Research Journal, 35: 773–783.Google Scholar
  23. Lather, P., 1991, Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Loughran, J., Hamilton, M.L., LaBoskey, V. K., and Russell, T., 2004, International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  25. McCarthey, S.J., 1994, Authors, text and talk: The internalization of dialogue from social interaction during writing, Reading Research Quarterly, 29: 200–231.Google Scholar
  26. McMahon, S.I., 1997, Using documented written and oral dialogue to understand and challenge preservice teachersrs reflections, Teaching and Teacher Education, 13: 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan-Fleming, B. and Johnson, M., 2002, April, Uncooperative partnerships: Models and methods for growth through resistance, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans..Google Scholar
  28. Nassaji, H. and Wells, G., 2000, What’s the use of “triadic dialogue”? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics, 21: 376–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Padilla, R. V., 1992, Using dialogical research methods to study Chicano college students, TheUrban Review, 24: 175–183.Google Scholar
  30. Palmer, P.J., 1993, Good talk about teaching: Improving teaching through conversation and community, Change, 25: 8–13.Google Scholar
  31. Rice, S., 1993, Teaching and learning through story and dialogue, Educational Theory, 43: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Richert, A.E., 1990, Teaching teachers to reflect: A consideration of programme structure, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22: 509–527.Google Scholar
  33. Tannen, D., 1998, The Argument Culture: Moving from Debate to Dialogue, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Vygotsky, L.S., 1978, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peggy Placier
    • 1
  • Stefinee Pinnegar
    • 2
  • Mary Lynn Hamilton
    • 3
  • Karen Guilfoyle
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Missouri-ColumbiaUSA
  2. 2.Brigham Young UniversityUSA
  3. 3.University of KansasUSA
  4. 4.University of IdahoUSA

Personalised recommendations