Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Pendulum pp 209–235Cite as

Idealisation and Galileo’s Pendulum Discoveries: Historical, Philosophical and Pedagogical Considerations

  • Chapter

Abstract.

Galileo’s discovery of the properties of pendulum motion depended on his adoption of the novel methodology of idealisation. Galileo’s laws of pendulum motion could not be accepted until the empiricist methodological constraints placed on science by Aristotle,and by common sense, were overturned. As long as scientific claims were judged by how the world was immediately seen to behave, and as long as mathematics and physics were kept separate, then Galileo’s pendulum claims could not be substantiated; the evidence was against them. Proof of the laws required not just a new science, but a new way of doing science, a new way of handling evidence, a new methodology of science. This was Galileo’s method of idealisatioin. It was the foundation of the Galilean—Newtonian Paradigm which characterised the Scientific Revolution of the 17th century, and the subsequent centuries of modern science. As the pendulum was central to Galileo’s and Newton’s physics, appreciating the role of idealisation in their work is an instructive way to learn about the nature of science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alters, B.J.: 1997, ‘Whose Nature of Science?’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G.: 1934/1984, The New Scientific Spirit, Beacon Books, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (ed.): 1984, The Complete Works of Aristotle, two volumes, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, W.F.: 1971, ‘A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Idealizations in Science’, Philosophy of Science 38, 258–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, W.F.: 1974, ‘A Pragmatic Analysis of Idealisations in Physics’, Philosophy of Science 41(1), 48–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, D.: 1992, ‘Guidobaldo del Monte and the Archimedean Revival’, Nuncius 7, 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, M.: 1993, Galileo Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burtt, E. A.: 1932, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science, 2nd ed., Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H.: 1949, The Origins of Modern Science 1300–1800, G. Bell and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N.: 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, I.B.: 1980, The Newtonian Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A.C.: 1970, ‘Premio Galileo 1968’, Physis xii, 106–108. Reproduced in A.C. Crombie, Science, Optics and Music in Medieval and Early Modern Thought, The Hambledon Press, London, 1990, pp. 359-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, A.C.: 1981, ‘Philosophical Presuppositions and the Shifting Interpretations of Galileo’. in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo’s Methodology, Reidel, Boston, pp. 271–286. Reproduced in A. C. Crombie, Science, Optics and Music in Medieval and Early Modern Thought, The Hambledon Press, London, 1990, pp. 345-362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: 1929, Experience and Nature, La Salle, IL., Open Court, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, E.J.: 1961/1986, The Mechanization of the World Picture, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, C.: 1989, ‘Idealization and the Abstractive-Theoretical Model of Scientific Explanation’, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 16, 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S. & Drabkin, I.E. (eds.): 1969, Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, S.: 1978, Galileo at Work, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Reprinted Dover Publications, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugas, R.: 1988, A History of Mechanics, Dover, New York (orig. 1955).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem, P.: 1906/1954, The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, trans. P.P. Wiener, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J., Glymour, C. & Mitchell, S. (eds.): 2002, Ceterus Paribus Laws, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fermi, L. & Bernadini, G.: 1961, Galileo and the Scientific Revolution, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, A.P.: 1965, Newtonian Mechanics, W.W. Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G.: 1586/1961, La Bilancetta, in L. Fermi & G. Bernardini, Galileo and the Scientific Revolution, Basic Books, New York, pp. 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G.: 1633/1953, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, S. Drake (trans.), University of California Press, Berkeley (second revised edition, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galileo, G.: 1638/1954, Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, trans. H. Crew & A.de Salvio, Dover Publications, New York (orig. 1914).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: 1988, Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: 1994, ‘The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Theories’, Philosophy of Science 64, 276–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giere, R.N.: 1999, Science Without Laws, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, B.: 1970, The Timely and the Timeless: the Interrelations of Science Education and Society, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré;, R.: 1989, ‘Idealization in Scientific Practice’, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 16, 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henninger-Voss, M.: 2000, ‘Working Machines and Noble Mechanics: Guidobaldo del Monte and the Translation of Knowledge’, Isis 91(2), 233–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, R.I.G.: 1990, ‘The Bohr Atom, Models and Realism’, Philosophical Topics 18, 71–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, W.C.: 1967, ‘Galileo, Falling Bodies and Inclined Planes: An Attempt at Reconstructing Galileo’s Discovery of the Law of Squares’, British Journal for the History of Science 3(11), 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, A.: 1947, Science, Liberty and Peace, Chatto & Windus, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I.: 1787/1933, Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd edit., N. K. Smith (trans.), Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M.: 1959, Mathematics and the Physical World, Dover Publications, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koertge, N.: 1977, ‘Galileo and the Problem of Accidents’, Journal of the History of Ideas 38, 389–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, A.: 1964, The Sleepwalkers, Penguin Books, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A.: 1943a/1968, ‘Galileo and the Scientific Revolution of the Seventeenth Century’, Philosophical Review 52, 333–348. Reprinted in his Metaphysics and Measurement, 1968, pp. 1-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A.: 1943b/1968, ‘Galileo and Plato’, Journal of the History of Ideas 4, 400–428. Reprinted in his Metaphysics and Measurement, 1968, pp. 16-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A.: 1953/1968, ‘An Experiment in Measurement’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 7, 222–237. Reproduced in his Metaphysics and Measurement, 1968, pp. 89-117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koyré, A.: 1968, Metaphysics and Measurement, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laymon, R.: 1985, ‘Idealizations and the Testing of Theories by Experimentation’, in P. Achinstein & O. Hannaway (eds.), Observation, Experiment, and Hypothesis in Modern Physical Science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 147–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W.F. & Olson, J.K.: 1998, ‘The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents’, in W.F. McComas (ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1978, ‘The Conception of Science in Galileo’s Work’. In R.E. Butts & J.C. Pitt (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo, Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp. 209–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1985, ‘Galilean Idealisation’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 16, 347–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1990, ‘Conceptions of Science in the Scientific Revolution’, in D.C. Lindberg & R.S. Westman (eds.), Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 2001, ‘the Impact of Newton’s Principia on thePhilosophy of Science’, Philosophy of Science 68(3), 279–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 2000, Time for Science Education: How Teaching the History and Philosophy of Pendulum Motion can Contribute to Science Literacy, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M.R.: 2000a, ‘Constructivism in Science and Mathematics Education’, in D.C. Phillips (ed.), National Society for the Study of Education 99th Yearbook, National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, pp. 161–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medina, C, Velazco, S. & Salinas, J.: 2004, ‘Experimental Control of Simple Pendulum Model’, Science & Education 13(7–8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meichtry, Y.J.: 1993, ‘The Impact of Science Curricula on Student Views About the Nature of Science’ Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(5), 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstrass, J.: 1972, ‘The Galilean Revolution: The Historical Fate of a Methodological Insight’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 2, 297–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monte, G. del: 1581/1969, Mechaniche, in S. Drake & I.E. Drabkin (eds.), Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp. 241–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R.H.: 1974, ‘The Evolution of an Experiment: Guidobaldo del Monte and Galileo’s Discourse Demonstration of the Parabolic Trajectory’, Physis 16, 323–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R.H.: 1980, ‘Role of Experiment in Galileo’s Early Work on the Law of Fall’, Annals of Science 37, 363–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, I.: 1729/1934, Mathematical Principles of Mathematical Philosophy, (translated A. Motte, revised F. Cajori), University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1990, ‘Theories, Approximations and Idealizations’, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 16, 9–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nola, R.: 2004, ‘Pendula, Models, Constructivism and Reality’, Science & Education 13(4–5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1972, ‘Theories, Idealization and Measurement’, Philosophy of Science 39, 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1980, The Structure of Idealization, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1992, ‘The Idealizational Approach to Science: A Survey’, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 25, 9–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 1994, ‘Remarks on the Nature of Galileo’s Methodological Revolution’, Poznań Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 42, 111–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, L.: 2000, ‘Galileo-Newton’s Model of Free Fall’, in Poznań Studies in Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities pp. 17–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore, J.: 1978, Science and Its Critics, Rutgers University Press, Rutgers, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G.: 1977, Mathematical Methods in Science, Mathematical Association of America, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R.: 1934/1959, The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R.S.: 2003, ‘The Nominalism versus Realism Debate: Toward a Philosophical rather than a Political Resolution’, Educational Theory 53(3), 275–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, J., Damerow, P. & Rieger, S.: 1998, ‘Hunting the White Elephant: When and How did Galileo Discover the Law of Fall’, Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. Subsequently published in Science in Context 13(3–4), 299–419; and in J. Renn (ed.), Galileo in Context, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P.L.: 1980, ‘Monte Guidobaldo, Marchese del’, in C.C. Gillispie (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography, Scribners, New York, IX, 487–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, P.L.: 1992, ‘Guidobaldo del Monte and the Archimedean Revival’, Nuncius 7, 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schecker, H.: 1992, ‘The Paradigmatic Change in Mechanics: Implications of Historical Processes on Physics Education’, Science and Education 1(1), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M.: 1961, ‘The Key Property of Physical Laws-Inaccuracy’, in H. Feigl & G. Maxwell (eds.), Current Issues in the Philosophy of Science, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, pp. 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, M.: 1991, In the Wake of Galileo, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M.J.: 2001, ‘Bayesian Confirmation and Idealizations’, Philosophy of Science 68(1), 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharratt, M.: 1994, Galileo. Decisive Innovator, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinner, A. & Metz, D.: 2002, ‘The Ubiquitous Pendulum: New Ways of Using the Pendulum in the Physics Classroom’, Physics in Canada 58, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchting, W.A.: 1995, ‘The Nature of Scientific Thought’, Science and Education 4(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L.W.: 1941, Physics, the Pioneer Science, Houghton and Miffin, Boston. Reprinted Dover, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W.A.: 1981, ‘Galileo and Reasoning ex suppositione’, in W.A. Wallace Prelude to Galileo, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 129–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, R.S.: 1988, ‘Newton and the Scientific Revolution’, in M. S. Stayer, Newton’s Dream, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston, pp. 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westfall, R.S.: 1990, ‘Making a World of Precision: Newton and the Construction of a Quantitative Physics’, in F. Durham & R.D Purrington (eds.), Some Truer Method. Reflections on the Heritage of Newton, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 59–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisan, W. L.: 1978, ‘Galileo’s Scientific Method: A Reexamination’, in R.E. Butts & J.C. Pitt (eds.), New Perspectives on Galileo, Reidel PublishingCompany, Dordrecht, pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisan, W.L.: 1981, ‘Galileo and the Emergence of a New Scientific Style’. in J. Hintikka, D. Gruender & E. Agazzi (eds.), Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo’s Methodology, Vol. I, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 311–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, L.: 1992, The Unnatural Nature of Science, Faber & Faber, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, UNSW, Sydney, 2052, Australia

    Michael R. Matthews

Authors
  1. Michael R. Matthews
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Michael R. Matthews  & Colin F. Gauld  & 

  2. University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    Arthur Stinner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matthews, M.R. (2005). Idealisation and Galileo’s Pendulum Discoveries: Historical, Philosophical and Pedagogical Considerations. In: Matthews, M.R., Gauld, C.F., Stinner, A. (eds) The Pendulum. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3526-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation