Abstract
I have to this point in this book used the term “authority” and cognate terms, but I have said nothing about how to understand the concept of authority in the context of an enquiry into legal institutions and the sources of law. That might seem extraordinary, and even perverse, for the following reason. Legal counsel pleading a case or advising a client, judges and other legal officials holding judicial hearings and issuing opinions and verdicts, legal scholars commenting on and analyzing legal decisions—all habitually talk about relevant legislation, or relevant case law, as being the “authorities” for the substantive legal claims that they make. It is of the essence of law as an institutionalized normative system1 that legal decision-making be based on grounds that are authoritative within the normative system. An account of the sources of law, which made no reference to the concept of authority, would seem therefore bizarrely incomplete.
For a legal system as an institutionalized normative system, see Raz 1975, chap. 4.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Authority. In: Roversi, C. (eds) A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3505-5_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3505-5_32
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3387-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3505-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)