Advertisement

POSSIBILITY OF COLOR MAGNETIC SUPERCONDUCTIVITY

  • Toshitaka Tatsumi
  • Tomoyuki Maruyama
  • Eiji Nakano
Part of the NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry book series (NAII, volume 197)

Abstract

Two aspects of quark matter at high density are addressed: one is color superconductivity and the other is ferromagnetism. We are mainly concerned with the latter and its relation to color superconductivity, which we call color magnetic superconductivity. The relation of ferromagnetism and chiral symmetry restoration is also discussed.

Keywords

Fermi Surface Nuclear Matter Chiral Symmetry Spin Polarization Quark Matter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. C. Barrois, Nucl. Phys. B129 (1977) 390, D. Bailin and A. Love, Phys. Rept. 107 (1984) 325. For recent reviews of CSC, K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, hep-ph/0011333; M. Alford, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 51 (2001) 131, and referenses cited therein.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    For a review, G. Chanmugam, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 30 (1992) 143.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    B. Paczynski, Acta. Astron. 41 (1992) 145; R.C. Duncan and C. Thompson, Astrophys. J. 392 (1992) L19; C. Thompson and R.C. Duncan, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 275 (1995) 255.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. Kouveliotou et al., Nature 393 (1998) 235; K. Hurley et al., Astrophys. J. 510 (1999) L111.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    S.B. Popov, in this proceedings.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    V.L. Ginzburg, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 9 (1964) 329; L. Woltjer, Ap. J. 140 (1964) 1309.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    V.R. Pandharipande, V.K. Garde and J.K. Srivastava, Phys. Lett. B38 485.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    T. Tatsumi, Phys. Lett. B489 (2000) 280.ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. Bloch, Z. Phys. 57 (1929) 545.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    e.g. K.Yoshida, Theory of Magnetism (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1996).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Maruyama and T. Tatsumi, Nucl. Phys. A693 (2001) 710.ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Müther and A. Sedrakian, Phys.Rev.Lett. 88 (2002) 252503; Phys.Rev. D67 (2003) 085024.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    E. Nakano, T. Maruyama and T. Tatsumi, Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 105001.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    L.N. Buaevskii et al., Adv. Phys. 34 (1985) 175.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S.S. Sexena et al., Nature 406 (2000) 587; C. Pfleiderer et al., Nature 412 (2001) 58; N.I. Karchev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 846; K. Machida and T. Ohmi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 850Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Nawa, E. Nakano, T. Maruyama and T. Tatsumi, in progress.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. J. Leggett, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47 (1975) 331.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    R. Tamagaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 44 (1970) 905; M. Hoffberg, A.E. Glassgold, R.W. Richardson and M. Ruderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24 (1970) 775.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R.D. Pisarski and D.H. Rischke, Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 094013.ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    T. Tatsumi and E. Nakano, in preparation.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    F. Dautry and E.M. Nyman, Nucl. Phys. 319 (1979) 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Kutschera, W. Broniowski and A. Kotlorz, Nucl. Phys. A516 (1990) 566.ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    K. Takahashi and T. Tatsumi, Phys. Rev. C63 (2000) 015205; Prog. Theor. Phys. 105 (2001) 437.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    D.V. Deryagin, D. Yu. Grigoriev and V.A. Rubakov, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7 (1992) 659. B.-Y. Park, M. Rho, A. Wirzba and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 034015. R. Rapp, E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Ohys. Rev. D63 (2001) 034008.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    A.W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. 128 (1962) 1437.CrossRefzbMATHADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    D.K. Campbell, R.F. Dashen and J.T. Manassah, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 979;1010.ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 345; 124 (1961) 246.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    S.P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992) 649. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247 (1994) 221.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    S. Weinberg, The quantum theory of field II (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 92 (1951) 664.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M.G. Alford, J.A. Bowers, J.M. Cheyne and G.A. Cowan, Phys.Rev.D67:054018 (2002). M. Buballa, J. Hos̃ek and M. Oertel, Phys.Rev.Lett.90:182002 (2002).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    F. Sannino, in this proceedings.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    S.P. Klevansky and R.H. Lemmer, Phys. Rev. D39 (1989) 3478. H. Suganuma and T. Tatsumi, Ann. Phys. 208 (1991) 470.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    M. Alford, K. Rajagopal and F.Wilczek, Phys. Lett. B422 (1998) 247; M. Alford, J. Berges and K. Rajagopal, Nucl. Phys. B571 (2000) 269.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Toshitaka Tatsumi
    • 1
  • Tomoyuki Maruyama
    • 2
  • Eiji Nakano
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.College of Bioresouce SciencesNihon UniversityFujisawaJapan
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsTokyo Metropolitan UniversityHachioji,TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations