Abstract
Are cultural differences superimposed upon a universal human nature? The appeal to an essentialist concept of human nature is a defensive reaction to the legacy of racist science left by Darwin’s argument in The Descent of Man. Humans are made to appear different in degree from their evolutionary antecedents by attributing the movement of history to a process of culture that differs in kind from the biological process of evolution. The specifications of evolved human nature are supposed to lie in the genes. However, human capacities are not genetically specified but emerge within processes of ontogenetic development. Moreover the circumstances of development are continually shaped through human activity. There is consequently no human nature that has escaped the current of history.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boas, F. 1940. Race, language and culture. New York: Free Press.
Bock, K.E. 1980. Human nature and history: A response to sociobiology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Brown, D.E. 1991. Human universals. New York: McGraw Hill.
Clark, D.J. 1990. The common heritage: The significance of hunter-gatherer societies for human evolution. Canberra: Australian National University.
Darwin, C. 1872. The origin of species, 6th Ed. London: John Murray.
Darwin, C. 1874. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex, 2nd Ed. London: John Murray.
Dent, C.H. 1990. “An ecological approach to language development: An alternative functionalism.” Developmental Psychobiology 23: 679–703.
Dunbar, R. 1994. “Sociality among humans and non-human animals.” In: Ingold, T. (ed.), Companion encyclopaedia of anthropology: Humanity, culture and social life 756–782. London: Routledge.
Griffiths, P.E.; and Gray, R.D. 1994. “Developmental systems and evolutionary explanation.” Journal of Philosophy XCI(6): 277–304.
Hull, D. 1984. “Historical entities and historical narratives.” In: Hookway, C. (ed.), Minds, machines and evolution 17–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. 1986. Evolution and social life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. 1998. “The evolution of society.” In: Fabian, A.C. (ed.), Evolution: Society, science and the universe 79–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Ingold, T. 2001. “From the transmission of representations to the education of attention.” In: Whitehouse, H. (ed.), The debated mind: Evolutionary psychology versus ethnography 113–153. Oxford: Berg.
Kawada, J. (n.d.). “Postures de portage et de travaux manuels, en rapport avec d’autres domaines de la vie Japonaise.” Paper presented to the Fyssen Foundation Colloquium on Culture and the uses of the body. Saint Germain en Laye, Paris, March 1996.
Kay, L.E. 1998. “A book of life? How the genome became an information system and DNA a language.” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 41: 504–528.
Keller, E.F. 2001. “Beyond the gene but beneath the skin.” In: Oyama, S.; Griffiths, P.E.; and Gray, R. (eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution 299–312. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kroeber, A.L. 1952. The nature of culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lehrman, D.S. 1953. “A critique of Konrad Lorenz’s theory of instinctive behavior.” The Quarterly Review of Biology 28: 337–363.
Lewontin, R.C. 1983. “Gene, organism and environment.” In: Bendall, D.S. (ed.), Evolution from molecules to men 273–285. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lovejoy, A.O. 1936. The great chain of being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mauss, M. 1979. Sociology and psychology: Essays. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Medawar, P. 1957. The uniqueness of the individual. London: Methuen.
Mellars, P.; and Stringer, C. (eds.). 1989. The human revolution: Behavioural and biological perspectives on the origins of modern humans. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Oyama, S. 1985. The ontogeny of information: Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Premack, D.; and Premack, A.J. 1994. “Why animals have neither culture nor history.” In: Ingold, T. (ed.), Companion encyclopaedia of anthropology: Humanity, culture and social life 350–365. London: Routledge.
Reynolds, P.C. 1981. On the evolution of human behavior: The argument from animals to man. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Thelen, E. 1995. “Motor development: A new synthesis.” The American Psychologist 50: 79–95.
Tooby, J.; and Cosmides, L. 1992. “The psychological foundations of culture.” In: Barkow, J.H.; Cosmides, L.; and Tooby, J. (eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture 19–136. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wallace, A.R. 1870. Contributions to the theory of natural selection. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ingold, T. (2006). Against human nature. In: Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., Aerts, D. (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3394-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3395-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)