Skip to main content
  • 1337 Accesses

Abstract

The first complete genome sequence of an organism was for yeast, in 1996. Since then, the much larger task of doing a complete human sequence has been completed. Those of major domestic animals are following rapidly. It will always be impossible to foresee the full potential of such an explosion in knowledge, but aspects of gene-based technologies are already beginning to have an impact in the livestock sector.

The first and most obvious area of impact concerns feed supply, which constitutes 50–75 percent of total costs in many livestock systems. Production costs for maize and soybean are being reduced by genetic modification of the crop for herbicide and insect resistance. Maize has been modified to reduce phosphorous and nitrogen excretion in swine and poultry, and also to provide a more valuable amino acid balance.

Genetic modification of the animal is also possible. Most dramatically, the insertion of a growth hormone in the DNA of fish accelerates growth. However, in this and all other cases, the genetic modification (GM) of animals has produced profound physiological disturbances. At the same time, the administration of GM-produced growth hormone to dairy cows is now routine in the United States of America and several other countries. This is not permitted in Europe, where the attitude to all GM technologies has been much more cautious.

Conventional selection programmes continue to deliver steady genetic improvement in all animal populations. New molecular methods offer the prospect of enhancing genetic gains, particularly for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure, or which have low heritability.

Gene technologies have much to contribute to the control of disease in animals. As pressure to reduce antibiotic and drug use increases, genetically modified vaccines with proven specificity and distinguishable from natural infections are already in use. DNA typing is helping with rapid and precise diagnosis. In addition, the interaction of some pathogens (e.g. scrapie) with the genotype of the animal calls for the application of DNA technologies.

Following the BSE epidemic in Europe, safety of livestock-derived foods is high on research and regulatory agendas. DNA techniques are already in use for tracking of sources of Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli outbreaks, as well as for traceability of product in the food chain.

Finally, gene-based technologies can facilitate the measurement and conservation of genetic diversity in animal populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bradley, D.G., MacHugh, D.E., Cunningham, E.P. & Loftus, R.T. 1996. Mitochondrial diversity and the origins of African and European cattle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 93: 5131–5135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.O. & Botstein, D. 1999. Exploring the new world of the genome with DNA microarrays. Nature Genetics, 21(1 Suppl): 33–37.

    PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Bulfield, G. 2000. Farm animal biotechnology. Trends in Biotechnology, 18: 10–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E.P. 1999. The application of biotechnologies to enhance animal production in different farming systems. Livestock Production Science, 58: 1–24.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E.P. (ed). 2003. After BSE — A future for the European livestock sector? EAAP Publication, No. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E.P. & Meghen, C.M. 2001. Biological identification systems: genetic markers. OIE Review of Science and Technology, 20: 491–499.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, E.P., Dooley, J.J., Splan, R.K. & Bradley, D.G. 2001. Microsatellite diversity, pedigree relatedness and the contributions of founder lineages to thoroughbred horses. Animal Genetics, 32: 360–364.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, J.C.M. & Hospital, F. 2002. The use of molecular genetics in the improvement of agricultural populations. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3: 22–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, C., Rosengrant, M., Steinfeld, H., Ehui, S., & Courbois, C. 1999. Livestock in 2020. The next food revolution. IFPRI/FAO/ILRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etherton, T.D. and a team of nine scientists. 2003. Biotechnology in animal agriculture: An overview. CAST Issue Paper, No. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU [European Union]. 2003. Overview report of a series of missions carried out in all member states during 2002 in order to evaluate the operation of controls over the traceability and labelling of beef and minced beef. DG Sanco Directorate F, Report 9505/2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations]. 2004. Domestic Animal Diversity Information System (DAD-IS). See: www.fao.org/dad-is.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georges, M. 2001. Recent progress in livestock genomics and potential impact on breeding programs. Theriogenology, 55: 15–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E.W., Bradley, D.G., El-Barody, M.A., Ertugrul, O., Splan, R.K., Zakharov, I. & Cunningham, E.P. 2002. History and integrity of thoroughbred dam lines revealed in equine mtDNA variation. Animal Genetics, 33: 287–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D.E., Wellnitz, O., Mitra, A. & Wall, R.J. 2002. Potential transgenic animals for agriculture. In: Proceedings of the 53rd EAAP Meeting. Cairo, September 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander E.S. 1999. Array of hope. Nature Genetics, 21(1 Suppl): 3–4.

    PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, R.T., MacHugh, D.E., Bradley, D.G., Sharp, P.M. & Cunningham, E.P. 1994. Evidence for 2 independent domestications of cattle. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 91: 2757–2761.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacHugh, D.E., Loftus, R.T., Bradley, D.G., Sharp, P.M. & Cunningham, E.P. 1994. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among European cattle breeds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biology, 256 (1345): 25–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacHugh, D.E., Shriver, M.D., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, E.P. & Bradley, D.G. 1997. Microsatellite DNA variation and the evolution, domestication and phylogeography of taurine and Zebu cattle (Bos taurus and Bos indicus). Genetics, 146: 1071–1086.

    PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, H., Rath, D. & Wrenzycki, C. 2003. Advances in biotechnology: new tools in future pig production for agriculture and biomedicine. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 38: 82–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, A.T., Bradley, D.G. & Cunningham, E.P. 2000. Parentage and relatedness determination in farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using microsatellite markers. Aquaculture, 182: 73–83.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, S.J., Menotti-Raymond, M., Murphy, W.J., Nash, W.G., Wienberg, J., Stanyon, R., Copeland, N.G., Jenkins, N.A., Womack, J.E. & Graves, J.A.M. 1999. The promise of comparative genomics in mammals. Science, 286(5439): 458–462, 479-481.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Prather, R.S., Hawley, R.J., Carter, D.B., Lai, L. & Greenstein, J.L. 2003. Transgenic swine for biomedicine and agriculture. Theriogenology, 59(1): 115–123.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, J.J. 2001. Greek temples, tropical kine and recombinant load. Livestock Production Science. 68: 171–179.

    Article  ISI  Google Scholar 

  • Troy, C.S., MacHugh, D.E., Bailey, J.F., Magee, D.A., Loftus, R.T., Cunningham, E.P., Chamberlain, A.T., Sykes, B.C., Bradley, D.G. 2001. Genetic evidence for Near-Eastern origins of European cattle. Nature, 410(6832): 108891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilma, T., Ahmad, S., Jones, L., Ngotho, R., Wamwai, H., Berhanu, B., Mebratu, G., Berhe, G., Diop, M., Sarr, J., Aziz, F. & Verardi, P. 2003. Inexpensive vaccines and rapid diagnostic kits tailor-made for the global eradication of rinderpest. pp. 99–111, in: F. Brown and J.A. Roth (eds). Vaccines for OIE List A and Emerging Animal Diseases. Proceedings of the International SymposiumAmes, Iowa16–18 September 2002. [Developments in Biologicals, No. 114]. Basle, Switzerland: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 IAEA

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cunningham, E. (2005). Gene-based Technologies for Livestock Industries in the 3rd Millennium. In: Makkar, H.P., Viljoen, G.J. (eds) Applications of Gene-Based Technologies for Improving Animal Production and Health in Developing Countries. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3312-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics