Abstract
The ‘mediatization’ or ‘digitalization’ of culture through rapid technological advances in media communications has had and will continue to have a profound impact on what it means to live, to work, and to learn in a culture of accelerated change. Communication and meaning-making-modes of individual and collective expression, creativity, representation are at the heart of culture. When changes occur to technologies of meaning-making, social tensions and anxieties escalate around issues of ownership, influence and effect, infrastructure and content, and access and opportunity. Much of this tension and anxiety can be traced to commonly cited, strongly held (yet highly debatable) beliefs about the relationship of literacy, as its pertains to a specific medium or media, to a plethora of ‘social goods’ including democratic participation, morality, health, and economic well-being. Here, literacy is defined as both a knowledge relationship and a set of cultural practices which enables one to manipulate communications media for a variety of meaning-making purposes. In this sense, then, literacy is both relational and contextual. Literacy is a central project of education. In these times of unprecedented change, it is important to ask of education its place in addressing the numerous and profound implications for (changes in) literacy in the context of contemporary culture
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alverman, D. E. (2001). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Executive Summary and Paper Commissioned by the National Reading Conference. Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.
Alverman, D. E., & Heron, A. H. (2001). Literacy identity work: Playing to learn with popular media. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45(2), 118–22.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (1999). Policy statement: Media education (RE9911) Pediatrics, 104(2), 341–343.
Ball, S., Kenny, A., & Gardiner, D. (1990). Literacy, politics, and the teaching of English. In I. Goodson & P. Medway (Eds.), Bringing English to order (pp. 47–86). London: Falmer Press.
Canadian Race Relations Foundation (1999). Curricula and special programs appropriate for the study of portrayal of diversity in the media. Retrieved February 27, 2003 from http://www.crr.ca/en/mediacentre/newsreleases/emedcen-newsreldivinmediareppg1.htm
Comber, B. (2002, July). Critical literacy: Maximising children’s investments in school learning. Draft discussion paper presented at the Resource Teachers: Literacy Training Programme, Christchurch, NZ.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.) (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
Department of Culture, Media and Sport. (2001). Media literacy statement: 2001. Retrieved February 27, 2003 from http://www.culture.gov.uk/pdf/mediallit2001.pdf
Foundation for the Atlantic Canada English Language Arts Curriculum (1996). Halifax: Department of Education and Culture, Government of Nova Scotia.
Graff, H. J. (1987). The legacies of literacy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hart, A. (Ed.) (1998). Teaching the media: International perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heins, M., & Cho, C. (2002). Media literacy: An alternative to censorship. New York: Free Expression Policy Project.
Kellner, D. (1998). Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy in a multicultural society. Educational Theory, 48(1), 103–122.
Kelly, U. (1997). Schooling desire: Literacy, cultural politics, and pedagogy. New York: Routledge.
Knobel, M. (2001). I’m not a pencil man: How one student challenges our notions of literacy “failure” in school. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44(5), 404–414.
Kress, G. (2000). Design and transformation: New theories of meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 153–161). London: Routledge.
Kumar, K. J. (2000, October). Media education in India: Strategies, trends, visions. Paper presented at the Stockholm Media Education Conference, Stockholm.
Lankshear, C. (1998). Meanings of literacy in contemporary educational reform proposals. Educational Theory, 48(3), 351–372.
Lankshear, C., Gee, J. P., Knobel, M., & Seale, C. (1997). Changing literacies. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sokoloff, H. (2002, October 2). Federal cuts threaten student tests: Provinces. National Post, A2.
Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organizations (UNESCO) (1999, April). Media education — Renewing UNESCO’s commitment. Retrieved February 27, 2003 from http://www.culture.gov.uk/pdf/mediallit2001.pdf
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organizations (UNESCO) (1999, April). Recommendations adopted by the Vienna conference “Educating for the Media and Digital Age”. Retrieved February 27, 2003 from http://193.170.81/cn/vs/media/impact/resolution.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kelly, U.A. (2005). Literacies and Media Culture. In: Bascia, N., Cumming, A., Datnow, A., Leithwood, K., Livingstone, D. (eds) International Handbook of Educational Policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_38
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3201-3_38
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3189-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3201-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)