Advertisement

Fisheries Management in the Russian Federation

  • Geir Hønneland
Chapter
  • 902 Downloads

Keywords

Fishery Management Precautionary Principle State Committee Fishing Vessel Exclusive Economic Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blakkisrud, H., 2001, The Russian regionalisation process: decentralisation by design or disintegration by default?, in Centre Periphery Relations in Russia. The Case of the Northwestern Regions, G. Hønneland and H. Blakkisrud, eds., Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot and Burlington, VT, pp. 61–89.Google Scholar
  2. Ellis, J., 2001, The straddling stocks agreement and the precautionary principle as interpretive device and rule of law, Ocean Development & International Law. 32(4): 289–311.Google Scholar
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization, 1996, Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (Rome, September 28, 1995), reproduced in G. Handl (ed.) (1996), Yearbook of International Environmental Law, Vol. 6, G. Handl, ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 334.Google Scholar
  4. Garcia, S.M., 1994, The precautionary principle: its implications in capture fisheries management, Ocean & Coastal Management. 22(2): 99–125.Google Scholar
  5. Hey, E., 1992, The precautionary concept in environmental law and policy: institutionalizing caution, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. 4(2): 303–318.Google Scholar
  6. Hohmann, H., 1994, Precautionary Legal Duties and Principles of Modern International Environmental Law. The Precautionary Principle: International Environmental Law between Exploitation and Protection, Graham & Trotman/Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, the Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Hønneland, G., 1998, Autonomy and regionalisation in the fisheries management of northwestern Russia, Marine Policy. 22(1): 57–65.Google Scholar
  8. Hønneland, G., 2001, Centre-periphery tensions in the management of northwest Russian fisheries, in Centre-Periphery Relations in Russia. The case of the Northwestern Regions, G. Hønneland and H. Blakkisrud, eds., Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot and Burlington, VT, pp. 165–186.Google Scholar
  9. Hønneland, G., 2004, Russian Fisheries Management. The Precautionary Approach in Theory and Practice, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers/rill Academic Publishers, Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
  10. Hønneland, G. and A.K. Jørgensen, 2002, Implementing Russia’s international fisheries agreements. Lessons from the northern basin, Marine Policy. 26(5): 359–367.Google Scholar
  11. Hønneland, G. and A.K. Jørgensen, 2003, Implementing International Environmental Agreements in Russia, Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hønneland, G. and F. Nilssen, 2000, Comanagement in northwest Russian fisheries, Society & Natural Resources. 13(8): 635–648.Google Scholar
  13. Hønneland, G. and F. Nilssen, 2001, Quota allocation in Russia’s northern fishery basin: principles and practice, Ocean & Coastal Management. 44(7–8): 471–488.Google Scholar
  14. Kaye, S.B., 2001, International Fisheries Management, Kluwer Law International, the Hague.Google Scholar
  15. Lauck, T., C.W. Clark, M. Mangel and G.R. Munro, 1998, Implementing the precautionary principle in fisheries management through marine reserves, Ecological Applications. 8(1) Supplement: S72–S78.Google Scholar
  16. Marciniak, B. and S. Jentoft, 1997, Fisheries management in post-communist Poland, Ocean & Coastal Management. 34(1): 73–81.Google Scholar
  17. McDonald, J.M., 1995, Appreciating the precautionary principle as an ethical evolution in ocean management, Ocean Development & International Law. 26(3): 255–286.Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Fisheries, 1999, Protokoll for den 28. sesjon i Den blandede norsk-russiske fiskerikommision (Protocol from the 28th session of the joint Norwegian Russian fisheries commission), the Ministry of Fisheries (Norway), Oslo.Google Scholar
  19. Murmansk Oblast, 2002, Vremennoye polozheniye o poryadke raspredeleniya na konkursuoy osnove kvot na vylov (dobychu) morskikh biologicheskikh resursov mezhdu polzovatelyami Murmanskoy oblasti (Preliminary provision on the order of distribution on a competitive basis of quotas of catch [exploitation] of marine biological resources among users of Murmansk oblast), adopted by the Government of Murmansk Oblast, 2002.Google Scholar
  20. O’Riordan, T. and J. Cameron, 1994, eds., Interpreting the Precouflonary Principle, Earthscan, London.Google Scholar
  21. Pautzke, C.G., 1997, Russian Far East Fisheries Management. North Pacific Fishery Management Council Report to Congress, North Pacific Fishery Management Council, Anchorage.Google Scholar
  22. Riggs, P., 1994, Fisheries and coastal management in the Republic of Estonia, Coastal Management. 22(1): 25–48.Google Scholar
  23. Risnes, B., 2001, Relations between Moscow and the regions of northwestern Russia — the legal aspect, in Centre-Periphery Relations in Russia. The case of the Northwestern Regions, G. Hønneland and H. Blakkisrud, eds., Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot and Burlington, VT, pp. 35–60.Google Scholar
  24. Russian Federation, 1993, Constitution of the Russian Federation, www.gov.ru/main/konst/konst0.html (June 2,2003).Google Scholar
  25. Russian Federation, 1997, Ukaz Prezidenta RF ot 29 avgusta 1997 N 950 ‘O merakh po obespecheniyu okhrany morskikh biologicheskikh resursov i gosudarstvennogo kontrolya v etoy sfere’ (Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 29 August 1997 N 950 ‘On measures to secure protection of marine biological resources and state control in this sphere’), August 29, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. Russian Federation, 1998, Ob Isklyuchitelnoy Ekonomicheskoy Zone Rossiyskoy Federatsii (On the Exclusive Economic Zone of the Russian Federation), Federal Law, adopted by the State Duma November 18, 1998, and by the Federation Council December 2, 1998, Moscow: the Russian Federation.Google Scholar
  27. Russian Federation, 2000a, O kvotakh na vylov (dobycku) vodnykh biologicheskikh resursov vnutrennikh morskikh vod, territorialnogo morya, kontinentalnogo shelfa i isklyuchitelnoy ekonomicheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii (On quotas of catch [exploitation] of aquatic biological resources of the Russian Federation’s internal ocean waters, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone), Governmental Resolution No. 1010 of December 27, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. Russian Federation, 2000b, O raspredelenii kvot na vylov (dobychu) vodnykh bioresursov vo vnutrennikh morskikh vodakh, v territorialnom more, isklyuchitelnoy ekonomicheskoy zone i na kontinentalnom shelfe Rossiyskoy Federatsii mezhdu zayavitelyami, zaregistrirovannymi v subyektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii, territorii kotorykh prilegayut k morskomu poberezhyu (On the distribution of quotas [exploitation] of aquatic bio-resources in the Russian Federation’s internal waters, territorial water, exclusive economic zone and on the continental shelf of the Russian Federation between applicants registered in subjects of the Russian Federation, whose territories border on the coastline), attached to O kvotakh na vylov (dobycku) vodnykh biologicheskikh resursov vnutrennikh morskikh vod, territorialnogo morya, kontinentalnogo shelfa i isklyuchitelnoy ekonomicheskoy zony Rossiyskoy Federatsii (On quotas of catch [exploitation] of aquatic biological resources of the Russian Federation’s internal ocean waters, continental shelf and exclusive economic zone), Governmental Resolution No. 1010 of December 27, 2000.Google Scholar
  29. Russian Federation, 2001, Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation to the Year 2020, approved by the President of the Russian Federation, July 27, 2001, Pr.-1387.Google Scholar
  30. Russian Federation, 2003, O kvotakh na vylov (dobychu) vodnykh biologicheskikh resursov (On quotas of catch [exploitation] of aquatic biological resources), Governmental Resolution No. 704 of November 20, 2003.Google Scholar
  31. State Committee for Fisheries, 1995, Vremennoye polozheniye o poryadke raspredeleniya obshchikh dopustimykh ulovov vodnykh biologichesklck resursov (Preliminary provision on the order for allocation of total allowable catches of aquatic biological resources), the State Committee of the Russian Federation for Fisheries, confirmed by Presidential Order No. 49 of March 22, 1995.Google Scholar
  32. United Nations, 1995, Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 Relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (New York, August 4, 1995), reproduced in International Legal Materials. 34(6): 1547–1580.Google Scholar
  33. Vetemaa, M., M. Eero and R. Hannesson, 2002, The Estonian fisheries: from the Soviet system to ITQs and quota auctions, Marine Policy. 26(2): 95–102.Google Scholar
  34. Vetemaa, M., V. Vaino, T. Saat and S. Kuldin, 2001, Co-operative fisheries management of the cross border lake Peipsi-Pihkva, Fisheries Management and Ecology. 8(4–5): 443–451.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geir Hønneland
    • 1
  1. 1.The Fridtjof Nansen InstituteLysakerNorway

Personalised recommendations