The Performance of Exclusive Economic Zones

The Case of Norway
  • Alf Håkon Hoel


European Union Fishery Management Fish Stock Coastal State Marine Resource 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andenæs, J. 1998, Statsforfatningen i Norge, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  2. Andresen S, T. Skodvin, A. Underdal, J. Wettestad, 2000, Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, University of Manchester Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
  3. Andresen, S., B. Fløystad, A. Underdal and W. Østreng, 1984: Forvaltningen av norske havområder: Integrasjon av ulike interesser, The Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker.Google Scholar
  4. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), 1998, Arctic Pollution Issues: A State of the Arctic Environment Report. AMAP, Oslo.Google Scholar
  5. Asgeirsdottir, A., 2000: Oceans of Trouble: Conflict and Cooperation over Fishing Resources in the North Atlantic and the Barents Sea, PhD thesis, Washington University, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  6. Balton, D., 1996, Strengthening the law of the sea: the new agreement on straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks, Ocean Development and International Law. 27 (1–2): 125–151.Google Scholar
  7. Borgese, E.M., 1998, The Oceanic Circle: Governing Seas as a Global Resource, United Nations University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Burke, W., 1994, The New International Law of Fisheries, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Churchill, R., 2001, Managing straddling fish stocks in the Northeast Atlantic: a multiplicity of instruments and regime linkages — but how effective a management? In: Stokke O, (ed.), 2001, Governing High Seas Fisheries: The lnterplay of Global and Regional Regimes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Churchill, R. and G. Ulfstein, 1992, Marine Management in Disputed Areas: The Case of The Barents Sea, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Ecosystem Advisory Panel, 1999, Ecosystem Based Fishery Management — A Report to Congress, National Marine Fisheries Service, Seattle.Google Scholar
  12. Edeson, W., 1999: Towards long-term sustainable use: some recent developments in the legal regime for fisheries, in Boyle A, and D. Freestone (eds.), International Law and Sustainable Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. FAO, 2003, The State of the World’s Fisheries and Aquaculture 2003, FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  14. FAO, 2002, Developing a workplan for exploring CITES issues with respect to international fish made, Doc. CL120/7,FAO, Rome.Google Scholar
  15. Flaaten O., 1988, Multispecies Fisheries Management: The Case of the Barents Sea, Springer Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  16. Gullestad, P., 1998, The scope for research in practical fisheries management, Fisheries Research. 37(1–3):251–258.Google Scholar
  17. Hey, E., 1996, Global fisheries regimes in the first half of the 1990s, International Journal of Marine & Coastal Law. 11(4) 459–90.Google Scholar
  18. Hoel, A.H., 1998, Managing the Barents Sea Fisheries: Impacts at National and International Level, in Berge E. and N.C. Stenseth, (eds), 1998, Law and the Governance of Reneawable Resources, ICS Press, Oakland.Google Scholar
  19. Hoel A.H, S. Jentoft S, and K. Mikalsen, 1996, User-group participation in Norwegian fisheries management, in Meyer R, C. Zhang, M.Windsor, B. McCay, L. Hushak, R. Muth, (eds. 1996, Fisheries Resource Utlization and Policy. Proceedings of the World Fisheries Congress, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing CO, New Dehli.Google Scholar
  20. Hoel, A.H., 1998, Political uncertainty in fisheries management, Fisheries Research. 37(1–3):239–250.Google Scholar
  21. Hoel, A.H., 1999, Ikke en fisk å gi. Norge, EU og fiskeriene, in Claes, D.H. and B. S. Tranøy (eds.), Utenfor, annerledes og suveren? Norge under EØS-avtalen, Fagbokforlaget, Bergen.Google Scholar
  22. Hønneland, G.B., 2004, Russian Fisheries Management. The Precautionary Approach in Theory and Practice, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Hønneland, G., 2000, Coercive and Discursive Compliance Mechanisms in the Management of Natural Resources: A Case Study from the Barents Sea Fisheries, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London.Google Scholar
  24. Institute of Marine Research (IMR), 2004, Havets ressurser 2004, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen.Google Scholar
  25. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), 1997, Report of the Study Group on the Precautionary Approach to Fisheries Management, ICES CM 1997/Assess:7, ICES, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  26. IWCO, 1998, The Ocean — Our Future. Report of the Independent World Commission of the Oceans, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  27. Juda L., 1996, International Law and Ocean Use Management, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  28. Kvalvik, L, 2004, The Barents Sea delimitation talks between Norway and Russia in light of changes in the international context, Acta Borealis, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  29. McGinn, A.P., 1999, Moving towards sustainable fisheries, Natural Resources Forum. 23: 135–45.Google Scholar
  30. Mikalsen, K. and S. Jentoft, 2003, Limits to particpation? On the history, structure, and reform of Norwegian fisheries management, Marine Policy. 27 (5): 397–407.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of Environment, 2002, Report to Parliament No 12 (2001–2002): Rent og rikt hav, Ministry of Environment, Oslo.Google Scholar
  32. Ministry of Fisheries, 1998, Report to Parliament No 51 (1997–98). Penpektiver på utviklingen av norsk fiskerinæring, Ministry of Fisheries, Oslo.Google Scholar
  33. Olsen, J.P., 1983, Organized Democracy, Norwegian University Press, Oslo.Google Scholar
  34. Orheim, O., 2001, What are the strategic challenges Norway is facing in the high North? The Security policy Library 7, The Norwegian Atlantic Committee, Oslo.Google Scholar
  35. Pauly, D., J. Alder, E. Bennett, V. Christensen, P. Tyedmers, and R. Watson, 2003, The Future for Fisheries, Science. 203:1359–1361.Google Scholar
  36. Sandberg P, B. Bogstad, and I. Røttingen, 1998, Bioeconomic advice on TAC — the state of the art in the Norwegian fisheries management, Fisheries Research. 37(1–3):259–274.Google Scholar
  37. Sjøtun, K., (ed), 2004, Havets miljø 2004, Fisken og havet. Special issue No. 2.Google Scholar
  38. Stokke O, (ed.), 2001, Governing High Seas Fisheries: The Interplay of Global and Regional Regimes, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stokke, O.S. and C. Coffey, 2004, Precaution, ICES and the Common Fisheries Policy: a Study of Regime Interplay, Marine Policy. 28: 117–126.Google Scholar
  40. Sydnes, A.K., 2001, Regional Fishery Organisations: How and Why Organisational Diversity Matters, Ocean Development and International Law. 32(4): 349–72.Google Scholar
  41. Tickner, J.A., (ed.), 2003, Precaution: Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy, Island Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  42. Vanderzwaag, D., 2002, The precautionary principle and marine environmental protection: slippery shores, rough seas, and rising normative tides, Ocean Development and International Law 33(2):165–188.Google Scholar
  43. Ulfstein, G., 1995, The Svalbard Treaty, Norwegian University Press, Oslo.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alf Håkon Hoel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations