Abstract
I discuss the Pythagorean law of small numbers and its use in interpretations of our sensory discriminations of consonance vs. dissonance. It seems that the fact of non-western musical traditions contradicts the law and forces us to interpret the discriminations as acquired and subjective. I would like to show that this is a wrong interpretation, because it is based on the irrelevant empirical evidence. It does not take into account the correct mathematical and physical explanation of the law, provided by Helmholtz’s theory in 1877 and corroborated by Plomp-Levelt experiment in 1965.
Key words
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bernstein, L., 1976, The Unanswered Question, Harvard University Press.
Galilei, G., 1974, Two New Sciences, transl. by S. Drake, University of Wisconsin Press.
Perlman, M., 1994, American gamelan in the garden of eden: intonation in a cross cultural encounter, Musical Quaterly 78: 510–555.
Sethares, W. A., 1997, Tuning, Timbre, Spectrum, Scale, Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this paper
Cite this paper
Šikić, Z. (2005). Mathematics, Physics and Music. In: Boniolo, G., Budinich, P., Trobok, M. (eds) The Role of Mathematics in Physical Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3107-6_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3107-6_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3106-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3107-6
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)