Nascent Communication Genres within SMS and MMS

  • Richard Ling
  • Tom Julsrud
  • Birgitte Yttri
Part of the The Kluwer International Series on Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (volume 4)


Mobile Communication Interpersonal Communication Mobile Telephony Communication Form Camera Phone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baron, N. 2000. Alphabet to Email: How written English evolved and where it’s heading. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Berger, P., and T. Luckmann. 1967. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  3. Boulding, K. 1980. Beasts, Ballads and Bouldingisms: A collection of writings by Kenneth E. Boulding. New Brunswik, NJ: Transaction.Google Scholar
  4. Bryson, B. 2003. A short history of nearly everything. New York: Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  5. Chandler, D. 1997. An introduction to genre theory.Google Scholar
  6. Choong, A. 2003. “Camera-phone dos and don’ts.” Cnet Asia.Google Scholar
  7. Fischer, C. 1992. America calling: a social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley, CA.: University of California.Google Scholar
  8. Gould, S.J. 1995. Dinosaur in a haystack. New York: Crown Trade Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  9. Grinter, R., and M Eldridge. 2001. “y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?” Pp. 219–238 in Proceedings of the seventh European conference on computer supported cooperative work ECSCW ‘01, edited by W. Prinz, Y. Jarke, K. Rogers, K. Schmidt, and V. Wulf. Dordech, Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  10. Haddon, L. 2001. “Domestication and mobile telephony.” in Machines that become us, edited by J. E. Katz. Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  11. Hård af Segerstaad, Y. 2003. “Language use in Swedish mobile text messaging.” in Front stage/Back stage: Mobile communication and the renegotiation of the social sphere, edited by R. Ling and P. Pedersen. Grimstad, Norway.Google Scholar
  12. Hashimoto, Y. 2002. “The spread of cellular phones and their influence on young people in Japan.” Pp. 101–112 in The social and cultural impact/meaning of mobile communication, edited by S. D. Kim. Chunchon, Korea: School of Communication Hallym University.Google Scholar
  13. Ito, M. 2001. “Mobile phones, Japanese youth and the replacement of social contact.” in Society for the social studies of science. Boston.Google Scholar
  14. ____. 2003. “Camera phones changing the definition of picture-worthy.” Japan Media Review.Google Scholar
  15. Johnsen, T. E. 2000. “Ring meg! En studie av ungdom og mobiltelefoni.” in Department of ethnology technical papers. Oslo: University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  16. Ling, R. 2003. “The socio-linguistics of SMS: An analysis of SMS use by a random sample of Norwegians.” in Front Stage/Back Stage: Mobile communication and the renegotiation of the social sphere, edited by R. Ling and P. Pedersen. Grimstad, Norway.Google Scholar
  17. ____. 2004. The Mobile Connection: The cell phone’s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  18. Ling, R., and B. Yttri. 2002. “Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway.” Pp. 139–169 in Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance, edited by J. E. Katz and M. Aakhus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mante-Meijer, E., and et al. 2001. “Checking it out with the people — ICT markets and users in Europe.” Heidelberg: EURESCOM.Google Scholar
  20. Martin, J. 2002. Star-spangled manners in which Miss Maners defends American etiquette (for a change). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  21. Miller, C.R. 1984. “Genre as social action.” Quarterly journal of speech 70:151–167.Google Scholar
  22. Orlikowski, W., and J. Yates. 1998. “Genre systems: Structuring interaction through communicative norms.” Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan school of management.Google Scholar
  23. Paragas, F. 2000. “A Case Study on the Continuum of Landline and Mobile Phone Services in the Philippines.” in The Social and Cultural Impact/Meaning of Mobile Communication conference, edited by S. D. Kim. Korea.Google Scholar
  24. Post, P. 2002. “Peggy Post etiquette for today.”Google Scholar
  25. PT. 2003. “De norske marked.” Post and teletilsyn.Google Scholar
  26. Rautiainen, P., and E-L. Kasesniemi. 2000. “Mobile communication of children and teenagers: case Finland 1997–2000.” Pp. 15–18 in Sosiale konsekvenser av mobiletelefoni: proceedings fra et seminar om samfunn, barn og mobile telefoni, edited by R. Ling and K Thrane. Kjeller: Telenor FoU.Google Scholar
  27. Sandvin, H.C., A. Dagfinrud, and J.P. Sæther. 2002. “Det norske telemarkedet — første halvår 2002.” Oslo: Norwegian post and telecommunications authority.Google Scholar
  28. Standage, T. 1998. The Victorian Internet. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
  29. Taylor, A., and R. Harper. 2001. “Talking ‘Activity’: Young people and mobile phones.” in CHI 2001 Workshop: Mobile communication: Understanding user, adoption and design, edited by L. Palen. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Ling
  • Tom Julsrud
  • Birgitte Yttri

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations