The Semantics of Fun: Differentiating Enjoyable Eeperiences
To summarise, this chapter has argued that although words like fun and pleasure are closely related and may each function as a superordinate category for the other, there are experiential and cultural differences between them. Fun has been considered in terms of distraction and pleasure in terms of absorption. This is not to suggest that pleasure is a more worthy pursuit than fun, it is rather an attempt to delineate different but equally important aspects of enjoyment. It is possible to appreciate Shakespeare and still acknowledge that The Simpsons is the greatest achievement of western civilisation. Both offer rich and fulfilling experiences but they are very different kinds of pleasures. As Peter Wright and John McCarthy argue elsewhere in this book, it is not possible to design an experience, only to design for an experience; but in order to do this it is necessary to have an understanding of that experience as it relates to and differs from others.
KeywordsEighteenth Century Cultural Connotation Cultural Industry Oxford English Dictionary Superordinate Category
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1986). Dialectic of Englightenment. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Bateson, G. (Ed.). (1972). Steps To An Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
- Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: The Experience of Work and Play in Games. San Fancisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
- Devereaux, M. (2001). The Philosophical Status Of Aesthetics. Available: http://aestheticsonline.org/ideas/devereaux.html.
- Goffman, E. (1972). Encounters: two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Jackson, P. (1998). John Dewey and the Lessons of Art: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Jordan, P. (2000). Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Kahneman, D. (1999). Objective happiness. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic quality (pp. 3–25). New York: Sage.Google Scholar
- Laurel, B. (1993). Computer as Theatre. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Monk, A. F., Hassenzahl, M., Blythe, M., & Reed, D. (2002). Funology: designing enjoyment. Paper presented at the CHI. p.p. 924–5Google Scholar
- Oxford English Dictionary. Available at: http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl
- Roijec, C. (1985). Capitalism and Leisure Theory. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
- Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaption and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 109–133). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Self, W. (1994). My idea of Fun. London: Penguin books.Google Scholar
- Skynner, R., & Cleese, J. (1993). Life And How To Survive It. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
- Thompson, E. P. (1963). The Making Of The English Working Class. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
- Willis, P. (1990). Common Culture: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Willis, P. (2000). The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar