Skip to main content

The Composite Species Concept: A Rigorous Basis for Cladistic Practice

  • Chapter
Current Themes in Theoretical Biology

Abstract

As previous work has shown, the genealogical network can be partitioned exhaustively into internodons, mutually exclusive and historically continuous entities delimited between two successive permanent splits or between a permanent split and an extinction. Internodons are not suitable candidates for the status of species, because of their short life span and the difficulty of recognizing their boundaries. However, internodons may be suitable building blocks for a viable species concept. We introduce the concept of composite species as a sequence of internodons, by qualifying only some permanent splits in the genealogical network as speciation events. The permanent splits that count as speciation events on our account are those associated with a character state fixation: this proposal ensures the recognizability of composite species. Lastly, we show how actual taxonomic practice is able to recover the phylogenetic tree of composite species from standard morphological data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cracraft, J. (1974). Phylogenetic models and classifications. Systematic Zoology 23: 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. Reprinted in Ereshefsky, 1992, pp. 93–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. (1989). Speciation and Its Ontology: The Empirical Consequences of Alternative Species Concepts for Understanding Patterns and Processes of Differentiation. In: Otte, D. and J. A. Endler (Eds). Speciation and Its Consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. pp. 28–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue (1988). Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4: 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and M. J. Donoghue (1990). Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson's version of cladistics? Cladistics 6: 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1970). Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and J. Cracraft (1980). Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky, M. (1991). Species, higher taxa, and the units of evolution. Reprinted in Ereshefsky, 1992, pp. 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ereshefsky, M. (Ed.) (1992). The Units of Evolution: Essays on the Nature of Species. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W. (1966). Phylogenetic Systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1976). Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology 25: 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. (1979). The limits of cladism. Systematic Zoology 28: 416–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornet, D. J. (1993). Permanent splits as speciation events: a formal reconstruction of the internodal species concept. Journal of Theoretical Biology 164: 407–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornet, D. J., J. A. J. Metz, and H. A. J. M. Schellinx (1995). Internodons as equivalence classes in genealogical networks: building-blocks for a rigorous species concept. Journal of Mathematical Biology 34: 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the Origin of Species. Dover, New York (reprinted 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1957). Species Concepts and Definitions. In: Mayr, E. (Ed.). The Species Problem. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C. pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. (1989). Cladistics and evolutionary models. Cladistics 5: 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and N. I. Platnick (1981). Systematics and Biogeography. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C. and Q. D. Wheeler (1990). An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6: 211–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, M. (1989). The cladistic solution to the species problem. Biology and Philosophy 4: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D. E. (1979). Fishes from the uplands and intermontane basins of Guatemala: revisionary studies and comparative geography. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 162: 267–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. (1961). Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York (reprinted 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L. (1991). PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis using Parsimony. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. (1981). Phylogenetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zandee, M. (1991). CAFCA, version 1.3c for Macintosh. User's manual distributed by the author. Institute of Theoretical Biology, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kornet, D.J., McAllister, J.W. (2005). The Composite Species Concept: A Rigorous Basis for Cladistic Practice. In: Reydon, T.A., Hemerik, L. (eds) Current Themes in Theoretical Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2904-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics