Advertisement

Images of the Genome: From Public Debates to Biology, and Back, and Forth

  • Cor van der Weele
Chapter

Abstract

Public debates on genomics are still troubled by unclear images about the relationship between nature and nurture. The biological concept of norm of reaction can potentially play an important clarifying role here, but so far it has been a technical concept that is mainly used within biology. This essay starts from the assumption that metaphors play a large role in the understanding of scientific concepts. Since biology is not only a source of technical concepts, but also a rich source of images, the question arises which images it provides in association with reaction norms. For a long time the concept of reaction norms did not match dominant metaphors of DNA, but the metaphors are changing: a thorough innovation of images about DNA and the genome is currently going on.

The second part of the paper starts from the question of how we may expect metaphors to influence public debates. Recent findings suggest that we should critically assess common assumptions about the interpretation of genetic metaphors. Interpretation is not univocal but appears to depend on the context. Building on this, I suggest some further thoughts. First, in public contexts, the urgency of ethical questions requires innovative imagery about the genome. Second, because of the active cognitive and heuristic use of metaphors in scientific contexts, there is reason to look at biology as an especially productive source of such innovative imagery.

Keywords

Green Fluorescent Protein Phenotypic Plasticity Public Debate Reaction Norm Scientific Context 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Avise, J. C. (2001). Evolving Genomic Metaphors: A new look at the language of DNA. Science 294: 86–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkel, D. van, and C. van der Weele (1999). Norms and prenorms on prenatal diagnosis: New ways to deal with morality in counseling. Patient Education and Counseling 37: 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradie, M. (1999). Science and metaphor. Biology and Philosophy 14: 159–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Condit, C. M. (1999). How the public understands genetics: Non-deterministic and non-discriminatory interpretations of the “blueprint” metaphor. Public Understanding of Science 8: 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Condit, C. M., B. R. Bates, R. Galloway, S. Brown Givens, C. K. Haynie, J. W. Jordan, G. Stables and H. M. West (2002). Recipes or blueprints for our genes? How contexts selectively activate the multiple meanings of metaphor. Quarterly Journal of Speech 88: 303–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza. Harcourt, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, S. F. (1997). Developmental Biology. Fifth Edition. Sinauer Press, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, S. F. (2001). Ecological developmental biology: Developmental biology meets the real world (Review). Developmental Biology 233: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilbert, S. F. (2002). The genome in its ecological context: Philosophical Perspectives on interspecies epigenesis. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 981: 202–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffiths, P. E. (2001). Genetic information: A metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science 68: 394–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffiths, P. E. (in press). The Fearless Vampire Conservator: Philip Kitcher and Genetic Determinism. In: Neumann-Held, E. M. and C. Rehmann-Sutter (Eds). Genes in Development: Rereading the Molecular Paradigm. Duke University Press, Durham.Google Scholar
  13. Houellebecq, M. (2001). The Elementary Particles. Vintage Books, London. (Originally: Les Particules Elémentaires, 1998).Google Scholar
  14. Jones, P. A. and S. B. Baylin (2002). The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nature Reviews/Genetics 3: 415–428.Google Scholar
  15. Keller, E. F. (1995). Refiguring Life; Metaphors of Twentieth-Century Biology. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Keller, E. F. (2000). The Century of the Gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  17. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  18. Lakoff, G., and M. Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh; The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Lewens, T. (2002). Development aid: On ontogeny and ethics. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Science 33: 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lewontin, R. C. (1974). The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes. American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411. Reprinted in: Levins, R. and R. C. Lewontin (1985). The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Lewontin, R. C. (2001). In the beginning was the word. Science 291: 1263–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liakopoulos, M. (2002). Pandora's Box or Panacea? Using metaphors to create the public representations of biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science 11: 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madoff, S. H. (2002). The Wonders of Genetics Breed a New Art. New York Times, May 26.Google Scholar
  24. Morange, M. (2001). The Misunderstood Gene. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  25. Nelkin, D. and M. S. Lindee (1995). The DNA Mystique; The Gene as a Cultural Icon. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Oyama, S. (2000). The Ontogeny of Information; Developmental Systems and Evolution. Duke University Press, Durham (originally 1985), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. Pennisi, E. (2001). Behind the scenes of gene expression. Science 293: 1064–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pigliucci, M. (2001). Phenotypic Plasticity; Beyond Nature and Nurture. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.Google Scholar
  29. Ramachandran, V. S. and E. M. Hubbard (2003). Hearing Colors, Tasting Shapes. Scientific American, April 15.Google Scholar
  30. Shapiro, J. A. (2002). Genome organization and Reorganization in Evolution: Formatting for Computation and Function. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981: 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singer, P. A. and A. S. Daar (2001). Harnessing genomics and biotechnology to improve global health equity. Science 294: 87–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sloterdijk, P. (1999). Regeln für den Menschenpark. Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
  33. Stern, J. (2000). Metaphor in Context. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  34. Thomson, A. (1993). Virtual Girl. Ace, New York.Google Scholar
  35. van Dijck, J. (1998). ImagEnation; Popular Images of Genetics. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Van Speybroeck, L., G. van de Vijver and D. de Waele (Eds) (2002). From Epigenesis to Epigenetics; The Genome in Context. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981.Google Scholar
  37. Weele, C. van der (1999). Images of Development; Environmental Causes in Ontogeny. SUNY-Press, Albany. (Originally 1995, PhD Thesis, Free University Amsterdam.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cor van der Weele
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied PhilosophyWageningen UniversityWageningen

Personalised recommendations