8. Conclusion
The primary aim of this study has been simply to show that autonomously morphological structure need not be an inert, defunct, residue of an earlier état de langue, nor a kind of diachronic ‘dead end’.35 It can be a dynamic, pervasive, self-reinforcing factor in morphological change. If morphology, and in particular autonomous morphology, is a ‘disease’ of language, it must be an extremely benign one. Indeed, so innocuous is it that speakers can actually pass up golden opportunities to align allomorphs with morphosyntactic properties (cf. the generalization of the preterite 1sg. PYTA alternant, described in 3.3), in favour of the ‘morphomic’ distribution. I have also sought — albeit speculatively — to suggest that the autonomously morphological may permeate phenomena which, prima facie, seem to be motivated by universal principles of iconic alignment between form and meaning. I proposed that complete levelling out of allomorphy — a common cross-linguistic phenomenon — could just as easily be formulated in ‘morphomic’ as in extramorphological terms, and that there was some evidence from Romance to suggest that such a perspective could not be excluded a priori. I have further argued that an autonomously morphological signatum, namely the very fact of being a formative, may be present even in simple, linear, concatenations of formatives, and therefore potentially present not only in any language, but indeed even in formatives which might have a lexical meaning. But the least claim I want to make is that morphologists, and especially historical morphologists, should not regard the autonomously morphological as a stagnant backwater of linguistic structure.
Part of the research for this paper benefited from an Arts and Humanities Research Board Research Leave Scheme grant in 2002–2003. I am also grateful to the editors of the Yearbook, Nigel Vincent, and two anonymous referees, for their very helpful input.
For an example of a productive, but not extramorphologically motivated, pattern of allomorphy in a non-Romance volume, see the comments on the Cushitic language Dhaasanac, see the article by Matthew Baerman, in this volume.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alibèrt, Lois (1976). Gramàtica occitana. Montpellier: Centre d’estudis occitans.
Alonso Garrote, S. (1947). El dialecto vulgar leonés hablado en Maragatería y tierra de Astorga. Madrid: CSIC.
Arnal Purroy, M. (1998). El habla de la Baja Ribagorzana occidental. Zaragoza: CSIC.
Aronoff, Mark (1994). Morphology by Itself. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark (1998). ‘Isomorphism and monotonicity’, in S. Lapointe, D. Brentari, P. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax. Stanford, CSLI, 411–18.
Aronoff, Mark (1999). Le système malgré lui, in P. Benincà, A. Mioni, L. Vanelli (eds.), Fonologia e morfologia dell’italiano e dei dialetti d’Italia. Rome, Bulzoni, 321–32.
Aski, Janice (1995). ‘Verbal suppletion: an analysis of Italian, French, and Spanish to go’, Linguistics 33, 403–32.
Azaretti, E. (1982). L’evoluzione dei dialethi ligurí esaminato attraverso lagrammatica storica del ventimiglíese. Sanremo: Casablanca.
Bartoli, Matteo (1906). Das Dalmatische. Vienna: Hölder.
Blank, Andreas (1997). Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bloomfield, Leonard (1935). Language. London: Allen and Unwin.
Booij, Geert (1997). ‘Allomorphy and the autonomy of morphology’, Folia Linguistica 31, 25–56.
Bybee, Joan (1985). Morphology. The Relation between Form and Meaning. Benjamins: Amsterdam.
Bybee, Joan and Brewer, M. (1980). ‘Explanation in morphophonemics: changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms’, Lingua 52, 201–242.
Bybee, Joan and Pardo. E (1981). ‘On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: a nonce-probe experiment with Spanish verbs’, Linguistics 19, 937–68.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea and Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (2000). ‘Stem alternants as morphological signata: evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18, 813–35.
Camilli, Amerindo (1929). ‘Il dialetto di Servigliano’, Archivum Romanicum 13, 220–71.
Carstairs, Andrew (1988). ‘Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion’, in Geert Booij and Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 67–94.
Carstairs, Andrew (1990). ‘Phonologically conditioned suppletion’, in W. Dressler et al. (eds.), Contemporary Morphology. Berlin/New York: Mouton De Gruyter, 17–23.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew (1994). ‘Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast’, Language 70, 737–88.
Chacón Berruga, T. (1981). El habla de la Rocha de la Mancha. Albacete: Instituto de estudios albacetenses.
Dauzat, Albert (1900). Morphologie du patois de Vinzelles. Paris: Bouillon.
Decurtins, Alexi (1958). Zur Morphologie der unregelmässigen Verben im Bündnerromanischen. Bern: Francke.
Dressler, Wolfgang (1985). ‘On the predictiveness of Natural Morphology’, Journal of Linguistics 21, 321–37.
Fanciullo, Franco (1998). ‘Per una interpretazione dei verbi italiani a “inserto” velare’, Archivio glottologico italiano 83, 188–239.
Fouché, Pierre (1929). ‘Etudes de philologie hispanique. III. Le parfait en castillan’, Revue hispanique 77, 45–87.
Fouché, Pierre (1967). Le verbe français. Etude morphologique. Paris: Klincksieck.
Haiman, John and Benincà, P. (1992). The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
Hamp, Eric (1992). ‘Etymology’, in William Bright (ed.) 1992. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1, 424–29.
Hockett, Charles (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.
Hopper, Paul and Traugott, Elizabeth (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hristea, Teofil (1958). ‘Etimologii populare’, Studii şi cercetări lingvistice 9, 511–31.
Iliescu, Maria (1990). ‘Les suffixes d’élargissement verbaux. (Etat de la question. Evolution sémantique de-esc-/-isc.)’, in G. Calboli (ed.) Latin Vulgaire — latin tardif II, Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Ionică, Ion (1974). Graiurile din sudul Olteniei. University of Bucharest [thesis].
Kiparsky, Paul (1968). ‘Linguistic universals and linguistic change’, in E. Bach and R. Harms (eds.), Universals and Linguistic Theory. London and New York: Holt, 171–202.
Lausberg, Heinrich (1976). Linguistica romanza. Milan: Feltrinelli.
Leone, Alfonso (1980). La morfologia del verbo nelle parlate della Sicilia sud-orientale. Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici Siciliani.
Magni, Elisabetta (2000). ‘Paradigm organization and lexical connections in the development of the Italian passato remoto’. In G. Booij and J. van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 1999. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 75–96.
Maiden, Martin (1991). ‘On the phonological vulnerability of complex paradigms: beyond analogy in Italo-and Ibero-Romance’. Romance Philology, 44, 284–305.
Maiden, Martin (1992). ‘Irregularity as a determinant of morphological change’, Journal of Linguistics 28, 285–312.
Maiden, Martin (1995). ‘A proposito dell’alternanza esce, usciva, in italiano’, Lingua Nostra 56, 37–41.
Maiden, Martin (1996). ‘The Romance gerund and System-Dependent Naturalness in morphology’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 94, 167–201.
Maiden, Martin (1997). ‘A propos d’un changement analogique remarquable en roumain: le type carte — cărţi’, Vox Romanica 56, 24–57.
Maiden, Martin (2000). ‘Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo’, Archivio glottologico italiano 85, 137–71.
Maiden, Martin (2001a). ‘A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines’, Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 58, 441–64.
Maiden, Martin (2001b). ‘Di nuovo sulle alternanze velari nel verbo italiano e spagnolo’, Cuadernos de filología italiana, 8, 39–61.
Maiden, Martin (2004). ‘Into the past. Morphological change in the dying years of Dalmatian’, Diachronica 21, 85–111.
Maiden, Martin (in press) ‘La ridistribuzione paradigmatica degli “aumenti” verbali nelle lingue romanze’, in S. Kiss and G. Salvi (eds.), Hommage à József Herman.
Maiden, Martin (in preparation (a)) ‘Morphophonological innovation’, for The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages.
Maiden, Martin (in preparation (b)) ‘An enduring legacy: the fate of the Latin perfective in Romanian’, MS.
Malkiel, Yakov (1960). ‘Paradigmatic resistance to sound change. The Old Spanish preterite forms vide, vido against the background of the recession of primary-d-’, Language 36, 281–346.
Marcato, Gianna and Ursini, Flavia (1998). Dialetti veneti. Grammatica e storia. Padua: Unipress.
Mărgărit, I. and Neagoe, V. (2000). Cercetări asupra graiurilor româneşti vorbite în nord-estul Bulgariei (regiunea Loveci), in Maria Marin, I. Mărgărit, V. Neagoe, V. Pavel (eds.), Cercetări asupra graiurilor româneşti de peste hotare, 10–29.
Matthews, Peter (1981). ‘Present stem alternations in Italian’. In Logos Semantikos: studia linguistica in honorem Eugeniu Coseriu. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Vol. 4, 57–76.
Maurer, Theodoro (1951). ‘The Romance conjugation in-esco-(-isco)-ire. Its origin in Vulgar Latin’, Language 27, 136–45.
Menéndez Pidal, Ramón (1941). Manual de gramática histórica española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Packard, Jerome (2000). The Morphology of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Penny, Ralph (2002). A History of the Spanish Language. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pirrelli, Vito (2000). Paradigmi in morfologia Un approccio interdisciplinare alla flessione verbale dell’italiano. Pisa-Rome: Istituti editoriali e poligrafici internazionali.
Pulgram, Ernest (1978). ‘Latin-Romance habere, double function and lexical split’, Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 94, 1–8.
Quint, Nicolas. 1998. Le parler occitan alpin du pays de Seyne. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Rohlfs, Gerhard (1968). Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Morfologia. Turin: Einaudi.
Ronjat, Jules (1937). Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol III. Montpellier: Socié té des langues romanes.
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke (2002). ‘Volksetymologie und Paronomasie als lautnachahmende Wortschöpfung’, in M. Habermann, P. Müller, H. Munske (eds.), HistorischeWortbildung des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 105–27.
Rudes, Blair (1980). ‘The functional development of the verbal suffix+esc+in Romance’. In J. Fisiak (ed.), Historical Morphology. The Hague: Mouton, 327–48.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1968 [=1913] Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.
Schmid, Heinrich (1949). Zur Formenbildung von dare und stare im Romanischen. Bern: Francke.
Stump, Gregory (2001). Inflectional Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taboada, Manuel (1979). El habla del Valle de Verín. Santiago: Verba, Anejo 15.
Tekavčić, Pavao (1980). Grammatica storica dell’italiano, II. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Vincent, Nigel (1988). ‘Italian’. In M. Harris and N. Vincent (eds.), The Romance Languages. London: Routledge.
Wagner, Max-Leopold (1939). ‘Flessionale nominale e verbale del sardo antico e moderno (II)’, L’Italia dialettale 15, 207–47.
Wheeler, Max (1993). ‘Changing inflection: verbs in North West Catalan’, in D. Mackenzie and I. Michael (eds.), Hispanic Linguistic Studies in Honour of F.W. Hodcroft. Langrannog: Dolphin, 171–206.
Wilkinson, H. 1981/82. ‘Palatal vs. velar in the stem of the Romance present’, Ronshu 22, 67–85; 23, 115–36.
Wolf, Heinz-Jürgen (1998). ‘Du latin aux langues romanes: le sort de l’infixe inchoatif-sc-et la conjugaison des verbes en-scere’, Travaux de linguistique et de philologie 36, 441–54.
Wurzel, Wolfgang (1987). ‘System-dependent morphological naturalness in inflection’, in W. Dressler et al., (eds.), Leitmotifs in Natural Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 59–96.
Zamboni, Alberto (1980/81). ‘Un problema di morfologia romanza, l’ampliamento verbale in-idio,-idzo’, Quaderni patavini di linguistica, 2, 171–88.
Zamboni, Alberto (1982/83). ‘La morfologia verbale latina in-sc-e la sua evoluzione romanza, appunti per una nuova via esplicativa’, Quaderni patavini di linguistica, 3, 87–138.
Zamboni, Alberto (1983). ‘Note aggiuntive alla questione dei verbi in-isco’, Studi di grammatica italiana, 12, 231–37.
Zink, G. (1989). Morphologie du français médiéval. Paris: PUF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maiden, M. (2005). Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In: Booij, G., van Marle, J. (eds) Yearbook of Morphology 2004. Yearbook of Morphology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2900-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2900-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2899-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2900-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)