Abstract
The chapter outlines the basics of journal gatekeeping and stresses the gatekeeping indicators initiated by us in the 1980s for the evaluation of the research performance of nations in all fields of science. The results have proven that these indicators correlate well with science indicators built on journal paper productivity and citations of nations and represent implicitly a component of quality somewhat associated with citation impact of journal papers. That is why gatekeeping indicators are useful and more simple to build as indicators based on publication productivity and citation impact.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bakker, P., Rigter, H. (1985). Editors of medical journals — who and from where. Scientometrics, 7, 11–22.
Braun, T., Bujdosó, E. (1983). Gatekeeping patterns in the publication of analytical-chemistry research. Talanta, 30, 161–167.
Braun, T., Dióspatonyi, I. (2004). The main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals. Gatekeeping indicators. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol., in print.
Braun, T., Dióspatonyi, I. (2004). The sciencific weight of nations measured via gatekeeping indicators, unpublished data.
Braun, T., Glänzel, W., Schubert, A. (1985). Scientometric indicators. A 32 Country comparison of publication productivity and citation impact. World Scientific Publ. Co., Ltd. Singapore.
Carpenter, M.P., Narin, F. (1980). Subject composition of the Worlds scientific journals. Scientometrics, 2, 53–63.
Crane, D. (1967). The gatekeepers of science: some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 195–201.
Frame, J.D., Carpenter, M.P. (1979). International research collaboration. Soc. Stud. Sci., 9, 481–497.
Le Minov, S., Dostatni, P. (1989). INSERM Report.
Nalimov, V.V., Mulchenko, Z.M. (1969). Naukometriya. Nauka. Moscow.
Rigter, H. (1986). Evaluation of performance of health research in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 15, 33–48.
Sievert, M.E., Haughawout, M. (1989). An editor’s influence on citation patterns — a case-study of elementary-school journal. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 40, 334–341.
Ulrich’s International Periodicals Directory, 18. ed., 1979–1980. New York, London: R.R. Bowker.
Nisonger, T.E. (2002). The relationship between international editorial board composition and citation measures in political science, business, and genetics journals. Scientometrics, 54, 257–268.
Zuckerman, H., Merton, F.K. (1971). Patterns of evaluation in science — institutionalisation, structure and functions of referee system. Minerva, 9, 66–100.
Zsindely, S., Schubert, A. (1989). Editors-in-chief of medical journals — are they experts, authorities, both, or neither. Commun. Res., 16, 695–700.
Zsindely, S., Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1982). Editorial gatekeeping patterns in international science journals — a new science indicator. Scientometrics, 4, 57–68.
Zsindely, S., Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1982). Citation patterns of editorial gatekeepers in international chemistry journals. Scientometrics, 4, 69–76.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Braun, T. (2004). Keeping the Gates of Science Journals. In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W., Schmoch, U. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2702-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2755-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)