Skip to main content

ERP Implementation, Cross-Functionality and Critical Change Factors

  • Conference paper
Enterprise Information Systems V

Abstract

ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) systems are characterised by particular features such as functional coverage, interdependent relationships, single database and standard management and processing rules; all of which are capable of bringing about various degrees of change within the company and, potentially, encourage a more cross-functional overview of it. However, few quantitative studies have been conducted to measure these effects.

This is the background to this paper, which studied 100 French companies to arrive at the following assessment of ERP adoption. It then goes on to test the relationships between the factors influencing the ERP lifecycle ((preparation (organizational vision, process re-engineering), engineering (specific developments), implementation strategy (functional coverage and speed)), the perception of a more cross-functional overview of the company and, more globally, the scope of the change this technology brings about within the company.

All these factors play significant roles, with functional coverage appearing to be a particularly important consideration, which should be addressed in future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adam, F., O’Doherty, O. (2000). “Enterprise Resource Planning: Myth and Reality” 5ème colloque de ľAIM, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Mashari, M., Zairi, M. (2000), “Revisiting BPR: a holistic review of practice and development”, Business Process Management Journal, Vol 6, nº1, pp 10–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsène, E. (1994), «L’intégration informatique et la transformation de ľorganisation», Revue Internationale du travail, vol. 133, nº 5–6, pp 719–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Amrani R., Geffroy-Maronnat B., Marciniak R., Rowe F., Bidan M., (2002), «PGI, flexibilités, organisation du travail et représentations dans les moyennes et grandes entreprises», rapport DARES-Ministère du Travail.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, G. (1938), La formation de ľesprit scientifique, Paris: Vrin, (réédition, (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bancroft, N. (1996). Implementing SAP/R3: How to introduce a large system into a large organization, London: Manning/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beath, C. A. (1991): “Supporting the Information Technology Champion”, MIS Quarterly, 15, 3, pp 355–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beretta S., (2001), “Unlashing the Integration Potential of ERP Systems: the Role of process based performance measurement systems”, 3rd Workshop on Management accounting Change, Siena, 17–19 May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besson, P. (1999). “Les ERP à ľépreuve de ľorganisation”, Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.4, nº4, pp 21–52.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Besson, P., Rowe, F. (2001), “ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue: perceived understanding, perceived leeway, and the nature of task-related conflicts”, Database for Advances in Information Systems; Vol. 32, nº 4; pp 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingi P., Sharma M. K., Golda J.K., (1999), “Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation”, Information Systems Management, pp.7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudreau, M-C., (1999), “ERP Implementation and Forms of Organizational Change”, working paper, Georgia university.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouillot, C. (1999). “Mise en place de Progiciels de Gestion Intégrée à ľoccasion de fusions et cessions ďentreprises dans un contexte international”, Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.4, nº4, pp 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P (1994), Le sens pratique, les éditions de Minuit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm L., Heinzl A., Markus M. L., (2001), “Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications”, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson P.J., Khan B.K., Rowe F., (1999), «Organizational Impacts of New Communication Technology: A Comparison of Cellular Phone adoption in France and the United States», Global Information Management, Vol.7, nº.3

    Google Scholar 

  • CIGREF (1999): Club Informatique des Grandes Entreprises Françaises: «Retours ďexpériences ERP», rapport consultable sur www.cigref.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Coat F., Favier M., (1999), «Passage à ľERP et refonte du système ďinformation: le cas des ASF», Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.4, nº4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier M., Friedberg E., (1977), ľacteur et le système, Paris, Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T.H. (1998) «Putting the Entreprise in the Entreprise system», Harvard Business Review. Jul–Aug.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport T.H., Short J.E. (1990), «The new industrial engineering information technology and Business Processus Redesign», Sloan management Review, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. (1993), Process Innovation: Reengineering work through information technology, Harvard Business School Press, Moston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, J., Pastor, J. (2001). “Entreprise Resource Planning Sysytems Research: an annotated bibliography”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forest, G.,(1999), «Généalogie des ERP et gestion des flux physiques», Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.4, nº4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulk J., DeSanctis G., (1995), “Electronic Communication and Changing Organizational Forms”, Organization Science, Vol.6, Nº.4, July–August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. (1977), Organization Design, Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallivan M., Hofman D., Orlikowski W., (1994), “Implementing radical change: gradual versus rapid pace”, XVth International Conference on Information Systems, Vancouver, pp 325–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geffroy-Maronnat, B., (2002), «Intégration informationnelle et formes ďinterdépendances: quels enjeux organisationnels ? le cas de ľERP dans une PME», 7ème colloque de ľAIM, Hammemet, Tunisie

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V. Jeong, S. Kettinger, W. Teng, J.(1995). “The implementation of Business Process Reengineering”, Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 12, nº1, pp 109–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M., Champy J. (1991), Reengineering the corporation, Haper Business, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., Braa, K., (1999), “SAP as Emergent Infrastructure in a Global Organization”, Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.4, nº4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong K. K., Kim Y. G., (2002), “The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective”, Information & Management, 40, pp. 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenppa S. L., Ives B. (1991): «Executive Involvement and Participation in the Management of Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, 15, 2, pp 205–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P.R., Lorsch J.W. (1973), Adapter les structures de ľentreprise, intégration et différenciation, Les Ed. ďOrganisation — Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton D., (1988). «Implementation characteristics of organizational innovations», Communication Research, October, pp 603–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesuisse R., (2002), «De la spécificité à la généricité des logiciels», in Rowe F (ed.), Faire de la recherche en systèmes ďinformation, Paris, Vuibert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorino P. (1995), «Le déploiement de la valeur par les processus», Revue Franèaise de Gestion, Nº 104, pp 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozzi, M., Maggiolini, P., Migliarese, P., (2000), «Joint design of organization processes and information system: a methodology based on action theory», 5e Colloque de ľAIM, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciniak, R. (1996), «Management des projets informatiques: complexité et gestion des conflits», Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol. 1, nº1, pp 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marciniak, R., Rowe, F. (1997). Systèmes ďinformation, dynamique et organisation, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus M. L., (1983), “Power, politics, and MIS implementation”, Communication of the ACM, 26, 6, pp. 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus M.L., Tanis C. (2000). The Enterprise System Experience: from adoption to success, in Framing the domains of I.T. management, Zmud R. (ed.), Cincinnati: Pinnaflex, pp 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus M.L., Tanis C., Van Fenema P. (2000), “Multisite ERP implementations”, Communications of the ACM, vol.43, nº4, pp 42–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K., Somers T. M. (2001), “The Impact of Critical Success Factors across the Stages of ERP Implementations”, Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D.F., (1979): “Social choice in machine design: The case of automatically controlled machine tools” in Case studies on the labor process, Monthly Review Press, New York, pp 18–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (1992), “Learning from Notes: organizational issues in Groupware Implementation” Technical Report, Center for coordination Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. (1996), “Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective”, Information Systems Research, vol.7, nº1, pp 63–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parr A. N., (2000), «A Taxonomy of ERP Implementation Approches”, Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston R., Grabski S. (2001), “The impact of Entreprise Resource Planning Systems on firm performance”, XXIInd International Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravarini, A., Tagliavini, M., Pigni, F., Sciuto, D. (2000), “A Framework for Evaluating ERP Acquisition within SMEs”, 5ème colloque de ľAIM, Montpellier, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D., Ross, J. W., and Boudreau, M.-C., (A venir) “Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change,” Journal of Management Information System.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey D., Boudreau M.-C. (2000), “Organizational consequences of information technology: dealing with diversity in empirical research”, in Framing the domains of I.T. management, Zmud R. (ed.), Cincinnati: Pinnaflex, pp 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockart J.F., Short J.E. (1995), «L’organisation en réseau et le management de ľinterdépendance», in L’entreprise compétitive au futur, Technologies de ľinformation et transformation de ľorganisation, de Michael S. Scott Morton, Les Ed. ďOrganisation, chap. 7, pp 233–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, F. (1999), «Cohérence, intégration informationnelle et changement: esquisse ďun programme de recherche à partir des Progiciels Intégrés de Gestion», Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.4, nº4, pp 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Léger, G., Nubert, G., Pichot, L., (2002), «Projet ERP: incidence des spécificités des entreprises sur les FCS», 7ème colloque de ľAIM, Hammemet, Tunisie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. (1987). Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems (2nd Ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarondeau, J.C. (1998), «De nouvelles formes ďorganisation pour ľentreprise. La gestion par les processus», Cahier Franèais, Management et organisation des entreprises, nº 287. La Documentation Franèaise, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truex, D. (2001). “ERP Systems as facilitating and confounding factors in corporate mergers: the case of two Canadian telecommunications companies”, Systèmes ďInformation et Management, vol.6, nº1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urwin G., (2001), “Managing complexity in implementing ERP projects”, Proceeding of the Twelfth Australian Conference on Information Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. Scott Poole, M. (1995), “Explaining development and change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, vol.20, nº3, pp 510–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Everdingen, Y. Van Hillegersberg, J. Waarts, E. (2000), “ERP Adoption by European midsize companies”, Communications of the ACM, vol.43, nº4, pp 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazici, H.J. (2002), «The role of communication in organizational change: an empirical investigation», Information & Management, Vol. 39, Issue 7, July, pp 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this paper

Cite this paper

El Amrani, R., Geffroy-Maronnat, B., Rowe, F., Marciniak, R., Bidan, M. (2004). ERP Implementation, Cross-Functionality and Critical Change Factors. In: Camp, O., Filipe, J.B.L., Hammoudi, S., Piattini, M. (eds) Enterprise Information Systems V. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2673-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2673-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1726-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2673-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics