This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Acharya, G. (2000). Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics, 35, 63–74.
Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M. & Louviere, J. (1998). Stated preference approach for measuring passive use values: Choice experiments and contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64–75.
Adamowicz, W., Louviere, J., Williams, M. (1994). Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271–292.
Alavalapati, J. R. R., & Nair, P. K. R. (2001). Socioeconomic and institutional perspectives of agroforestry. World forests, society and environment: Markets and policies (pp. 71–81). In M. Palo & J. Uusivuori (Eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Arrow, K. R., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R., & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 4601–4614.
Boggess, C.F., Flaig, E. G., & Fluck, R. C. (1995). Phosphorus budget-basin relationships for Lake Okeechobee tributary basins. Ecological Engineering, 5, 143–162.
Cameron, T. A. (1988). A new paradigm for valuing non-market goods using referendum data: Maximum likelihood estimation by censored logit regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 15: 335–379.
Cannell, M. G. R. (1999). Growing trees to sequester carbon in the UK: Answers to some common questions. Forestry, 72, 237–247.
Carson, R. T., Flores, N. E., & Meade, N. F. (2001). Contingent valuation: Controversies and evidence. Environmental and Resource Economics, 19, 173–210.
Clason, T. R. & Sharrow, S. H. (2000). Silvopasture practices. In H. E. Garrett, W. J. Rietveld, & R. F. Fisher, (Eds.), North American agroforestry: An integrated science and practice, (pp. 119–148). Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy, Inc.
Cooper, J. C., & Keim, R. W. (1996). Incentive payments to encourage farmer adoption of water quality protection practices. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 54–64.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (1995). Water quality functions of riparian forest buffer systems in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. [Technology Transfer Report EPA 903-R.95-004]. Nutrient Subcommittee of the Chesapeake Bay Program, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Florida Agricultural Statistics Service [FAS], 2002. Beef cattle and calf inventory by county. Livestock, dairy, and poultry summary, Florida Agricultural Statistics Service. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Tallahassee, Florida.
Feather, P., Hellerstein, D., & Hansen, L. (1999). Economic valuation of environmental benefits and the targeting of conservation programs: The case of the CRP. [Agricultural Economic Report No. 778]. Washington DC: USDA Economic Research Service.
Freeman, A. M., III. (1993). The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the Future.
Garrett, H. E., Rietveld, W. J., & Fisher, R. F. (Eds.). (2000). North American agroforestry: An integrated science and practice. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.
Garrod, G., & Willis, K. G. (1999). Economic valuation of the environment: Method and case studies. Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar.
Holmes, T. P., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2003). Attribute-based methods. In P. Champ, K. Boyle, & T. Brown, (Eds.), A Primer of Non-market Valuation (pp. 171–219). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kingsbury, L., & Boggess, W. (1999). An economic analysis of riparian landowners’ willingness to participate in Oregon’s Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program. Selected paper for the annual meeting of the Agricultural Economics Association, Ames, Iowa.
Lant, C. L. (1991). Potential of the Conservation Reserve Program to control agricultural surface water pollution. Environmental Management, 15, 507–518.
Lohr, L., & Park, T. (1994). Discrete/continuous choices in contingent valuation surveys: Soil conservation decisions in Michigan. Review of Agricultural Economics, 16, 1–15.
Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Maddala, G. S, (1999). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. (Econometric Society Monographs No. 3). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
McFadden, D., 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in econometrics. P. Zarembka, ed., pp. 105–142, Academic Press, New York.
Mitchell, R.C., (2000). On designing constructed markets in valuation surveys. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 297–321.
Mitchell, R. C., & Carson, R. T. (1989). Using surveys to value pubic goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
Morrison, J. L., & Humphrey, S. R. (2001). Conservation value of private lands for Crested Caracaras in Florida. Conservation Biology, 15, 675–684.
Nicholson, W. (1998). Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions (7th ed.). Orlando, Florida: Dryden Press.
Pattanayak, S. K., & Butry, D. T. (2003). Forest ecosystem services as production inputs. In E. O. Sills & K. L. Abt, (Eds.), Forests in a market economy, (pp 361–378). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pimentel, D., Harvey, C., Resosudarmo, P., Sinclair, K., Kurz, D., McNair, M. et al. (1995). Environmental and economics costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science, 267(5201), 1117–1123.
Randall, A. (1987). Resources economics: An economic approach to natural resource and environmental policy (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Son.
Salant, P., & Dillman, D. (1994). How to conduct your own survey. New York: John Wiley & Son.
Sedjo, R. A. (2001). Forest’ sinks’ as a tool for climate-change policymaking: A look at the advantages and challenges. Resources, 143, 21–24.
Shrestha, R. K., & Alavalapati, J. R. R. (2002). Valuing environmental benefits of agroforestry using attribute-based stated preference method. Paper presented in the 2nd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, June 24–27, Monterey, California.
Shrestha, R.K., & Alavalapati, J. R. R. (2003). Cattle ranchers’ willingness to accept for silvopasture adoption: A contingent valuation approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Shyamsunder, P., & Kramer, R. A. (1996). Tropical forest protection: An empirical analysis of the costs borne by local people. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 31, 129–144.
Sugden, R. (1999). Public goods and contingent valuation. In I. J. Bateman & K. G. Willis (Eds.), Valuing environmental preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries, (pp. 131–151). New York: Oxford University Press.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (1997). 1997 Census of Agriculture: National, state, and county tables. Washington D.C.: USDA.
Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis (3rd ed.). New York: W.W. Norton.
Wade, M. A., Minton, T., & Delargy, L. (2001). Pasture improvement practices utilized by Florida cattlemen. Florida Scientist, 64, 4–5.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shrestha, R.K., Alavalapati, J.R.R. (2004). Estimating Ranchers’ Cost of Agroforestry Adoption. In: Valuing Agroforestry Systems. Advances in Agroforestry, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2413-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2413-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2412-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2413-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)