This paper benefited from helpful comments and criticisms from Robert Stainton, Jason Stanley, Andrew Botterell, and Robyn Carston.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bach, K., “Conversational Impliciture.” Mind and Language 9 (1994): 124–62.
Bach, K., “Do Belief Reports Report Beliefs?” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 78 (1997): 215–41.
Barton, E., Nonsentential Constituents: A Theory of Grammatical Structure and Pragmatic Interpretation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1990.
Carston, R., “Implicature, Expliciture, and Truth-Theoretic Semantics.” In S. David (ed.), Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991: 33–51.
Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1965.
Clapp, L., “What Unarticulated Constituents Could Not Be.” In J. Campbell, M. O’Rourke and D. Shier (eds.) Meaning and Truth. New York: Seven Bridges Press. 2002: 231–256.
Davidson, D., “On Saying That.” Synthese 19 (1968): 158–74.
Frege, G., “Uber Sinn und Bedeutung.” Zeitshrift fur Philosophie und Philosophische Kritik 100 (1893): 5–50.
Frege, G., “Der Gedanke”, 1918. Translated as “Thoughts” in Geach, 1977.
Geach, P. (ed.), Logical Investigations. tr. P. Geach and R. Stoothoff. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. 1977.
Higginbotham, J., “Belief and Logical Form.” Mind and Language 4 (1991): 344–69.
Larson, R. and Segal, G., Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1995.
Morgan, J., “Sentence Fragments and the Notion of ‘sentence’.” In Issues in Linguistics, B. Kachru et al. (eds.) Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 1973: 719–751.
Recanati, F., “Domains of Discourse.” Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (1996): 445–75.
Richard, M., Propositional Attitudes: An Essay on Thoughts and How We Ascribe Them. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1990.
Sag, I., and Hankamer, J., “Syntactically vs. Pragmatically Controlled Anaphora.” In Studies in Language Variation, R. Gasold and R. Shuy (eds.) Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press. 1977.
Schiffer, S., “Belief Ascription.” The Journal of Philosophy 89 (1992): 499–521.
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D., Relevance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1986.
Stainton, R., “Using Non-Sentences: An Application of Relevance Theory.” Pragmatics and Cognition 2 (1994): 269–84.
Stainton, R., “Non-Sentential Assertions and Semantic Ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 18 (1995): 281–96.
Stanley, J., “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23(4) (2000): 391–434.
Stanley, J., and Z. Szabo, “Quantifier Domain Restriction.” Mind and Language 15(2&3) (2000): 219–261.
Travis, C., “On What is Strictly Speaking True.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(2) (1985): 187–229.
Williams, E., “Discourse and Logical Form.” Linguistic Inquiry 8 (1977): 101–139.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clapp, L. (2005). On the Interpretation and Performance of Non-Sentential Assertions. In: Elugardo, R., Stainton, R.J. (eds) Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. En]Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-2299-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-2301-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)