Skip to main content

Quinean Interpretation and Anti-Vernacularism

  • Chapter
Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech

Part of the book series: En]Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 81))

  • 472 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach, K., “Conversational Implicature.” Mind and Language 9 (1994): 124–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K., “The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What it is and Why It Matters.” In Ken Turner (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View (CRiSPI 1). Oxford: Elvesier Science. 1999: 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K., “Quantification, Qualification and Context: A Reply to Stanley and Szabo.” Mind and Language 15 (2000): 262–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R., “Implicature, Explicature and Truth Theoretic Semantics.” In R. Kempson (ed.) Mental Representation: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1988: 155–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R., “Enrichment and Loosening: Complementary Processes in Deriving the Proposition Expressed?” In Ken Turner (ed.) Mental Representations: Interface from Different Points of View (CRiSPI 1). Oxford: Elvesier Science. 1999: 85–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elugardo, R., and Stainton, R.J., “Logical Form and the Vernacular.” Mind and Language 16(4) (2001): 393–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., and Tversky, A., Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine, W.V.O., Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Récanati, F., Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. London: Longman. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Récanati, F., “Unarticulated Constituents.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2002): 299–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, J., and Szabó, Z., “On quantifier domain restriction.” Mind and Language 15(2&3) (2000): 219–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, S. (2005). Quinean Interpretation and Anti-Vernacularism. In: Elugardo, R., Stainton, R.J. (eds) Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. En]Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 81. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2301-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics