Advertisement

Sens

Chapter
  • 551 Downloads
Part of the Philosophical Problems Today book series (PHIP, volume 2)

Keywords

Discourse Representation Structure Fonctions Locale Correspondant Exact 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. Anderson, Anthony. [55] ‘General Intensional Logic’. In Guenthner (F.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. I, Elements of Classical Logic. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1983. Vol. II, Extensions of Classical Logic, Ibid., 1984. Vol. III, Alternatives to Classical Logic, Ibid., 1986. Vol. IV, Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Ibid., 1989 Gabbay and Guenthner [61], 355–385.Google Scholar
  2. Apel, Karl-Otto. [12] ‘Intentions, Conventions, and Reference to Things: Dimensions of Understanding, Meaning in Hermeneutics and in Analytic Philosophy of Language’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981 Parret and Bouveresse [7], 79–111.Google Scholar
  3. Barwise (Jon) and Perry (John). [69] Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, Mass./London, The MIT Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. Bencivenga, Ermanno. [33] ‘A New Paradigm of Meaning’. Synthese 73 (1987): 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. van Benthem, Johan. [57] Essays in logical Semantics. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1986.Google Scholar
  6. — [58] ‘Toward a Computational Semantics’. In Gärdenfors [35], 31–71.Google Scholar
  7. — [50] ‘Meaning: Interpretation and Inference’. Synthese 73 (1987): 451–470.Google Scholar
  8. Bierwisch, Manfred. [80] ‘Semantic Structure and Illocutionary Force’. In Kiefer (Ferenc), and Bierwisch (Manfred), Speech Act Theory an d Pragmatics. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1980. Searle, Kiefer, and Bierwisch [32], 1–35.Google Scholar
  9. Bonomi, Andrea. [70] ‘Relevant Situations’. Synthese 73 (1987):623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouveresse, Jacques. [13] ‘Herméneutique et linguistique’. In Bouveresse (Jacques),Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 112–153.Google Scholar
  11. Bubner (Rüdiger), Cramer (Konrad), Wiehl (Reiner), eds. [29] Hermeneutik und Dialektik, Aufsätze I, Methode und Wissenschaft Lebenswelt und Geschichte, Aufsätze II, Sprache und Logik. Theorie der Auslegung und Probleme der Einzelwissenschaften. Tübingen, J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Casari, Ettore. [59] ‘Comparative Logic’. Synthese 73 (1987): 421–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cresswell, M. J. [51] Semantical Essays. Possible Worlds and Their Rivals. Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. Dalla Chiara, Maria Luisa. [54] ‘An Approach to Intensional Semantics’. Synthese 73 (1987): 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dascal, Marcelo. [24] ‘Strategies of Understanding’. In Bouveresse (Jacques),Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 327–352.Google Scholar
  16. Davidson, Donald. [42] ‘Reality without Reference’. In Platts 1980, 131–140.Google Scholar
  17. — [30] Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation Oxford, Ciarendon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
  18. Dummett, Michael. [19] Frege Philosophy of Language London, Duckworth, 1973.Google Scholar
  19. — [43] Elements of Intuitionism. London, Duckworth 1977.Google Scholar
  20. — [44] Truth and Other Enigmas Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  21. — [45] The intertpretation of Frege’s Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  22. — [77] ‘The Philosophy of Thought and Philosophy of Language’. In Fondation Singer-Polignac [60], 141–155.Google Scholar
  23. Eco, Umberto. [34] ‘Meaning and Denotation’. Synthese 73 (1987): 549–568.Google Scholar
  24. Engel, Pascal. [20] La norme du vrai. Philosophie de la logique. Paris, Gallimard, 1989.Google Scholar
  25. Evans, Gareth. [22] ‘Understanding Demonstratives’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 280–303.Google Scholar
  26. Fenstad (Jens Erik), Halvorsen (Per-Kristian), Langholm (Tore), and van Benthem (Johan) [71] Situations Language and Logic. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1987.Google Scholar
  27. Føllesdal, Dagfinn. [14] ‘Understanding and Rationality’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 154–168.Google Scholar
  28. Fondation Singer-Polignac. [60] Mérites et limites des méthodes logiques en philosophie, Colloque organisé par Jules Vuillemin. Paris, J. Vrin, 1986.Google Scholar
  29. Gabbay (D.) and Guenthner (F.), eds. [61] Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. I, Elements of Classical Logic Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1983. Vol. II, Extensions of Classical Logic, Ibid., 1984. Vol. III, Alternatives to Classical Logic, Ibid., 1986. Vol. IV, Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Ibid., 1989.Google Scholar
  30. Gärdenfors, Peter, ed. [35] Generalized Quantifiers. Linguistic and Logical Approaches Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster/Tokyo, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1987.Google Scholar
  31. de Gelder, Beatrice. [10] ‘I know what you mean, but if only I understood you...’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 44–60.Google Scholar
  32. Granger, Gilles-Gaston. [26] ‘Qu’est-ce que comprendre la formule: “2 + 2 = 4”?’ In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 389–401.Google Scholar
  33. Greisch, Jean. [6] L’âge herméneutique de la raison. Paris, Ed. du Cerf, 1985.Google Scholar
  34. Groenerdijk (J.), Janssen (T.), and Stokhof (M.), eds. [31] Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht, Foris, 1984.Google Scholar
  35. Guenthner, Franz. [68] ‘Linguistic Meaning in Discourse Representation Theory’. Synthese 73 (1987): 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Guenthner (F.) and Schmidt (S. J.), eds. [38] Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1979.Google Scholar
  37. Hintikka, Jaakko. [63] ‘Language Understanding and Strategic Meaning’. Synthese 73 (1987): 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hintikka, Jaakko, in collaboration with Kulas, Jack. [64] The Game of Language. Studies in Game-Theoretical Semantics and its Applications, Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1983.Google Scholar
  39. Holdcroft, David. [15] ‘Principles of Conversation, Speech Acts, and Radical Interpretation’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 184–203.Google Scholar
  40. Holenstein, Elmar. [16] ‘Universals of Knowledge — Constraints on Understanding’ In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 171–183.Google Scholar
  41. Jacob, Pierre. [47] ‘Is There a Path Half-Way Between Realism and Verificationism?’Synthese 73 (1987): 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jacques, Francis. [74] Dialogiques. Recherches logiques sur le dialogue. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1979.Google Scholar
  43. — [25] ‘Les conditions dialogiques de la compréhension ou le paradoxe de Narcisse’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 353–386.Google Scholar
  44. — [75] Dialogiques II L’espace logique de l’interlocution. Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1985.Google Scholar
  45. Kalinowski, Georges. [36] Sémiotique et philosophie. A partir et à l’encontre de Husserl et de Carnap. Paris/Amsterdam, Hadès/Benjamin, 1985.Google Scholar
  46. Kambartel, Friedrich. [27] ‘The Pragmatic Understanding of Language and the Argumentative Function of Logic’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 402–410.Google Scholar
  47. Kamp, Hans. [66] ‘Semantics versus Pragmatics’. In Schmidt (S. J.), Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1979. Guenthner and Schmidt [38], 255–287.Google Scholar
  48. — [67] ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’. In Janssen (T.), and Stokhof (M.),Truth, Interpretation and Information. Dordrecht, Foris, 1984. Groenerdijk, Janssen, and Stokhof [31], 1–41.Google Scholar
  49. von Kutschera, Franz. [56] Einführung in die intensionale Semantik. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1976.Google Scholar
  50. Levinson, Stephen C. [39] Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  51. Lewis, D. K. [52] The Plurality of Worlds. Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1986.Google Scholar
  52. Martin, R.M. [40] Pragmatics. Truth and Language. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1979.Google Scholar
  53. Martin-Löf, Per. [48] ‘Truth of a Proposition, Evidence of a Judgment, Validity of a Proof’. Synthese 73 (1987): 407–420.Google Scholar
  54. McDowell, John. [18] ‘Anti-realism and the Epistemology of Understanding’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 225–248.Google Scholar
  55. Montague, Richard. [53] Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, edited by R. Thomason. New Haven/London, Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
  56. Parret, Herman. [21] ‘Perspectival Understanding’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 249–279.Google Scholar
  57. Parret (Herman) and Bouveresse (Jacques), eds. [7] Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981.Google Scholar
  58. — [8] Introduction. Ibid., 1–25.Google Scholar
  59. Platts, Mark, ed. [37] Reference. Truth and Meaning, Essay on the Philosophy of Language. London/Boston/Henley, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980.Google Scholar
  60. Prawitz, Dag. [46] ‘Some Remarks on Verificationist Theories of Meaning’. Synthese 73 (1987): 471–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Proust, Joëlle. [23] ‘Sens frégéen et compréhension de la langue’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 304–323.Google Scholar
  62. Récanati, François. [41] La transparence et l’énonciation. Pour introduire a la pragmatique. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1979.Google Scholar
  63. Ricceur, Paul. [2] Temps et récit I. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1983.Google Scholar
  64. — [3] Temps et récit II. La configuration dans le récit de fiction. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1984.Google Scholar
  65. — [4] Temps et récit III. Le temps raconté. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1985.Google Scholar
  66. — [1] Du texte à l’action. Essais d’herméneutique II. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1986.Google Scholar
  67. — [5] Soi-même comme un autre. Paris, Ed. du Seuil, 1990.Google Scholar
  68. Rosenberg, Jay R. [9] ‘On Understanding the Difficulty in Understanding Understanding’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 29–43.Google Scholar
  69. Saarinen, Esa, ed. [65] Game-Theoretical Semantics, Essays on Semantics. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1979.Google Scholar
  70. Santambrogio, Marco. [79] ‘Generic and Intentional Objects’. Synthese 73 (1987): 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schiffer, Stephen. [17] ‘Truth and the Theory of Content’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981. Parret and Bouveresse [7], 204–222.Google Scholar
  72. Searle, John. [73] Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1979. Trad, franç, de Joëlle Proust: Sens et expression, Etudes de théorie des actes de langage, Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1982.Google Scholar
  73. — [72] ‘The Background of Meaning’. In Kiefer (Ferenc), and Bierwisch (Manfred), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1980. Searle, Kiefer, and Bierwisch [32], 221–232.Google Scholar
  74. — [78] Intentionality. An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press, 1983. Trad, franç, de Claude Pichevin, L’intentionalité. Essai de philosophie des états mentaux. Paris, Ed. de Minuit, 1985.Google Scholar
  75. Searle (John R.), Kiefer (Ferenc), and Bierwisch (Manfred), eds. [32] Speech Act Theory an dPragmatics. Dordrecht/Boston/London, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1980.Google Scholar
  76. Searle (John), and Vanderveken (Daniel).-[76] Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
  77. Sundholm, Garan. [49] ‘Proof Theory and Meaning’. In Guenthner (F.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. I, Elements of Classical Logic. Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster, D. Reidel Publ. Cy, 1983. Vol. II, Extensions of Classical Logic, Ibid., 1984. Vol. III, Alternatives to ClassicalLogic, Ibid., 1986. Vol. IV, Topics in the Philosophy of Language, Ibid., 1989 Gabbay and Guenthner [61], 471–506.Google Scholar
  78. Van Dalen, Dirk. [62] Logic and Structure. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo, Springer Verlag, 1980, 2ème éd. 1983.Google Scholar
  79. Wason, Peter C. [28] ‘Understanding and the Limits of Formal Thinking’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981 Parret and Bouveresse [7], 411–421.Google Scholar
  80. Zaslawsky, Denis. [11] ‘On the Semantic Structure of “Meaning” and “ Understanding ”’. In Bouveresse (Jacques), Meaning and Understanding. Berlin/New York, Walter de Gruyter, 1981 Parret and Bouveresse [7], 61–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations