Skip to main content

A Restricted Subset Selection Rule for Selecting At Least One of the t Best Normal Populations in Terms of Their Means: Common Known Variance Case

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Statistics for Industry and Technology ((SIT))

Abstract

Consider k (≥ 2) normal populations with unknown means μ1,..., μk and a common known variance σ2. Let μ[1] ≤ ... ≤ μ[k] denote the ordered μi. Our goal is to select a non-empty subset of the k populations whose size is at most m (1 ≤ mk − t) so that at least one of the populations associated with the t (1 ≤ tk − 1) largest means is included in the selected subset with a minimum guaranteed probability P*, whenever μ[kt+1] − μ[k−t] ≥ δ* where P* and δ* are specified in advance of the experiment. Santner (1976) proposed and investigated a procedure (R s) based on samples of size n from each of the populations. We propose and investigate an alternative procedure R hp with the same sampling scheme. We compare our rule with that of a procedure that selects a subset of fixed size m. The special case of t = 1 was earlier studied by Gupta and Santner (1973) and Hsu and Panchapakesan (2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alam, K. and Rizvi, M. H. (1966). Selection from multivariate normal populations, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 18, 307–318.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Desu, M. M. and Sobel, M. (1968). A fixed subset-size approach to the selection problem, Biometrika, 55, 401–410. Corrections and Amendments, Biometrika, 55 (1968), 685.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, S. S. and Santner, T. J. (1973). On selection and ranking procedures-a restricted subset selection rule, In Proceedings of the 39th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Volume 45, Book I, pp. 478–486, Vienna, Austria.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hsu, L. and Panchapakesan, S. (2003). Selecting the normal population with largest mean: a restricted subset selection rule, In Statistical Methods and Practice: Recent Advances (Eds., N. Balakrishnan, N. Kannan and M. R. Srinivasan), Chapter 10, pp. 145–161, Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann, E. L. (1986). Testing of Statistical Hypotheses, Second edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mahamunulu, D. M. (1967). Some fixed-sample ranking and selection problems, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 1079–1081.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Santner, T. J. (1975). A restricted subset selection approach to ranking and selection problems, Annals of Statistics, 3, 334–349.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Santner, T. J. (1976). A generalized goal in restricted subset selection theory, Sankhyā, Series B, 38, 129–143.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Birkhäuser Boston

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hsu, L., Panchapakesan, S. (2005). A Restricted Subset Selection Rule for Selecting At Least One of the t Best Normal Populations in Terms of Their Means: Common Known Variance Case. In: Balakrishnan, N., Nagaraja, H.N., Kannan, N. (eds) Advances in Ranking and Selection, Multiple Comparisons, and Reliability. Statistics for Industry and Technology. Birkhäuser Boston. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-8176-4422-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics