Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Handbook of Social Psychology pp 29–51Cite as

Expectation States Theory

  • Chapter

Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Conclusion

Expectation states theory is, in many ways, a textbook example of a theoretical research program. It is deductive, programmatic, formalized mathematically, cumulative, precise, and predictive; and its propositions have been subjected to rigorous evaluation. More importantly, however, it is a theory that illuminates core issues in social psychology and sociology more broadly. It is fundamentally a “macro-micro-macro” explanation about one way that categorical inequality is reproduced in society. Cultural beliefs about social categories at the macro level impact behavior and evaluation at the individual level, which acts to reproduce status structures that are consistent with pre-existing macro-level beliefs. Status structures in groups can be thought of as the building blocks of more macro-level structural inequalities in society. For example, to the extent that status processes make it less likely for women in work groups to emerge or be accepted as leaders, in the aggregate we will observe that more men than women hold leadership positions in organizations, a stratification pattern that is reproduced at least partially by the way macro-level beliefs impact individual behaviors and evaluations.

By focusing on the role of differentiated performance expectations, expectation states theory provides a unifying explanation for how reward structures, behavioral patterns, and macro-level beliefs about a diverse array of social categories produce similar effects on the organization of interactional status hierarchies, the building blocks of societal stratification. It helps us understand how inequitable structures emerge in these smaller structures, which increases our understanding of the emergence and reproduction of inequality in society more generally.

Keywords

  • Status Characteristic
  • Status Belief
  • American Sociological Review
  • Performance Expectation
  • Status Hierarchy

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aries, E. (1996). Men and women in interaction: Reconsidering the differences. New York: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balkwell, J. W. (1991). From expectations to behavior: An improved postulate for expectation states theory. American Sociological Review, 56, 355–369.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Conner, T. L., & Fisek, M. H. (Eds.). (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Wagner, D. G. (1985). The formation of reward expectations in status situations. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence (pp. 215–261). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R., & Zelditch, M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Norman, R. Z., Balkwell, J. W., & Smith, L. (1992). Status inconsistency in task situations: A test of four status processing principles. American Sociological Review, 57, 843–855.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Ridgeway, C. L., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1998). The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review, 63, 379–405.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., Wagner, D., & Zelditch, M. (1992). A working strategy for constructing theories. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Metatheorizing (pp. 107–123). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J., & Zelditch, M. (1998). Status, power, and legitimacy: Strategies and theories. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M., & Brown, R. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 554–594). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernat, M., & Kobrynowicz, D. (1997). Gender and race-based standards of competence: lower minimum standards but higher ability standards for devalued groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 544–557.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bylsma, W., & Major, B. (1992). Two routes to eliminating gender differences in personal entitlement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 193–200.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. L. (1993). Reflections of an affirmative action baby. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, C. H. (1902). Human nature and the social order. New York: Schribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, K. S. (1975). Expectations, evaluations, and equity. American Sociological Review, 40, 372–388.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J. (2001a). Gender and the career-choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Correll, S. J. (2001b). The gendered selection of activities and the reproduction of gender segregation in the labor force. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., & Ellyson, S. L. (1985). Patterns of visual dominance behavior in humans. In S. Ellyson & J. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 129–150). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. E., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K. Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580–587.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice towards female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 537–598

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, K. G. (1998). The impact of cultural status beliefs on individual task performance in evaluative settings: A new direction in expectation states research. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisek, M. H., Berger, J., & Norman, R. Z. (1991). Participation in heterogeneous and homogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 114–142.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Nelson-Kilger, M. (1992). Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16, 285–303.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M. (1989). Status characteristics, standards and attributions. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress (pp. 58–72). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 237–254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M. (2000). Double standards for competence: Theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 21–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Foschi, M., Lai, L. & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 326–39.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Freese, L., & Cohen, B. P. (1973). Eliminating status generalization. Sociometry, 36, 177–193.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, W. J. (1980). Expectations from unequal rewards. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 126–130.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T. (1997). An experimental replication of the depressed-entitlement effect among women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 387–393.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovaglia, M. J., Lucas, J. W., Houser, J. A., Thye, S. R., & Markovsky. B. (1998). Status processes and mental ability test scores. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 195–228.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Major, B., McFarlin, D., & Gagnon, D. (1984). Overworked and underpaid. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1399–1412.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Markovsky, B., Smith, L. F., & Berger, J. (1984). Do status interventions persist? American Sociological Review, 49, 373–382.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years’ research on the false-consensus effect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 72–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. C. (1968). Status and influence in small group interactions. Sociometry, 31, 47–63.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. C. (1985). Role enactment and self identity: An expectations states approach. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 262–316). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, R. Z., Smith, L., & Berger, J. (1988). The processing of inconsistent status information. In M. Webster & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 169–187). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746–762.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1987). Nonverbal behavior, dominance, and the basis of status in task groups. American Sociological Review, 52, 683–694.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367–386.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001a). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 627–655.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001b). Inequality, status, and the construction of status beliefs. In J. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory, (pp. 323–342). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Balkwell, J. (1997). Group processes and the diffusion of status beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 14–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1986). Expectations, legitimation, and dominance behavior in groups. American Sociological Review, 51, 603–617.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Berger, J., & Smith, L. (1985). Nonverbal cues and status: An expectation states approach. American Journal of Sociology, 90, 955–978.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Boyle, E. H., Kuipers, K., & Robinson, D. (1998). How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interaction. American Sociological Review, 63, 331–350.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Erickson, K. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 579–615.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., Johnson, C., & Diekema, D. (1994). External status, legitimacy, and compliance in male and female groups. Social Forces, 72, 1051–1077.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1994). Structure, culture, and interaction: Comparing two generative theories. Advances in Group Processes, 11, 213–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191–216.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash against agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743–762.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Riecken, H. W. (1958). The effect of talkativeness on ability to influence group solutions of problems. Sociometry, 21, 309–321.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. B., White, J., & Harvey, O. J. (1955). Status in experimentally produced groups. American Journal of Sociology, 60, 370–379.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Skvoretz, J., & Fararo, T. (1996). Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic network model. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1366–1414.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Lovin, L., & Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussion: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 424–435.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat is in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and intellectual task performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, P. A., & Moore, J. C. (1992). Wage disparities and performance expectations. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 78–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Strodtbeck, F. L., James R. M., & Hawkins, C. (1957). Social status in jury deliberations. American Sociological Review, 22, 713–719.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyer, L., & Younts, C. W. (1997). Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first-order and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 692–732.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Troyer, L. (2001). Effects of protocol differences on the study of status and social influence. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 182–205. http: www.uiowa.edu/~grpprc

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1982). Paths of relevance and the induction of status-task expectancies. Social Forces, 61, 575–586.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1997). Gender and interpersonal task behaviors: Status expectation accounts. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, H. A., & Zelditch, M. (1993). Power, legitimacy, and the stability of authority: A theoretical research program. In J. Berger & M. Zeltditich (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 364–384). Stanford, CA: Stanford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ([1918] 1968). Economy and society. Edited by G. Roth & C. Wittich. Translated by E. Frischoff. New York: Bedminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ([1921] 1946). Class, status, and party. In H. Gerth and C. W. Mills (Eds. and trans.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 180–195). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M. (1977). Equating characteristics and social interaction: Two experiments. Sociometry, 40, 41–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., & Driskell, J. E. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43, 220–236.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., & Foschi, M. (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., & Hysom, S. J. (1998). Creating status characteristics. American Sociological Review, 63, 351–379.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, M., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (1999). A theory of second-order expectations and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 17–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street corner society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M., & Floyd, A. S. (1998). Consensus, dissensus, and justification. In J. Berger and M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, power, and legitimacy: Strategies and theories (pp. 339–368). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelditch, M., Lauderdale, P., & Stublarec, S. (1980). How are inconsistencies between status and ability resolved? Social Forces, 58, 1025–1104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706

    Shelley J. Correll

  2. Department of Sociology, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Building 120, Room 160, Stanford, California, 94305-2047

    Cecilia L. Ridgeway

Authors
  1. Shelley J. Correll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cecilia L. Ridgeway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    John Delamater

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Correll, S.J., Ridgeway, C.L. (2006). Expectation States Theory. In: Delamater, J. (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Boston, MA . https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36921-X_2

Download citation

search

Navigation